1 / 23

Town and County of Nantucket: Article 68 Work Group

Town and County of Nantucket: Article 68 Work Group. Control of Fertilizer Application by Regulation: Experiences from other jurisdictions. Research by Lee W. Saperstein, June 29, 2010. Other Fertilizer Regulations.

thalia
Download Presentation

Town and County of Nantucket: Article 68 Work Group

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Town and County of Nantucket: Article 68 Work Group Control of Fertilizer Application by Regulation: Experiences from other jurisdictions. Research by Lee W. Saperstein, June 29, 2010

  2. Other Fertilizer Regulations • This summary is provided to the Art. 68 WG to help us learn from the regulatory experiences of others. • HPIC, who drafted Art. 68, found many examples of fertilizer-application regulations in other States and Counties. • WG Members have supplied some more.

  3. Other Fertilizer Regulations • A basic question is “why write regulations on a local level?” • One possible answer is that water-based commerce and recreation may be more important to some communities than to others. • Another is that nutrient contamination is only loosely controlled in the federal Clean Water Act, CWA, as amended.

  4. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Nutrient contamination is excessive amounts of nominally beneficial substances (nitrates and phosphates) that cause over-growth of algae and water-born plants leading to eutrophication and faunal toxicity. • Sources of nutrients include NOx from the atmosphere, overflows from septic systems, farms, and excess fertilizer, which is our concern.

  5. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Clean water is defined by use: drinking, swimming, irrigating, watering livestock, navigation, etc. National standards exist for threshold values of contaminant, NWQS. • States may identify the water quality of named bodies of water, hence their uses. • When communities found that traditional uses were jeopardized by degradation of water quality, they started to legislate.

  6. Other Fertilizer Regulations • The Vacuum in the CWA is that nutrient contamination is defined by what it is not: Non-point Pollution. • Non-point pollution sources (NPS) are to be controlled by Best Management Practice plans, not by permit. • Point sources such as publicly owned water treatment plants require permits and must meet rigidly defined discharges.

  7. Other Fertilizer Regulations • The Estuaries Project of MA extends the identification of water quality from streams, lakes, and ponds, to marine embayments and shore lands. • Nantucket Harbor and its other waters have been studied with conclusions reached about nutrient contamination: we are at a threshold.

  8. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Total Maximum Daily Loads (TMDL) have been defined for Nantucket Harbor. • Septic systems have been reviewed and a system of surveillance devised. Guidance for this comes from the Clean Water Act and Mass DEP • Fertilizer is our brief and there is less guidance on how to proceed. That’s why we’re looking at other jurisdictions.

  9. Other Fertilizer Regulations • We have found fertilizer application regulations from 2 States and 4 other localities. References are in the list of common documents with significant ones repeated here. • We are not including the much larger number of regulations on the manufacture and sale of fertilizer (The Fertilizer Institute: http://www.tfi.org/factsandstats/regulations.cfm).

  10. Other Fertilizer Regulations • States • Minnesota. The Land of 10,000 Lakes has written State-wide regulation for the control of phosphates presumably because they cause eutrophication of lakes, http://www.mda.state.mn.us/phoslaw. • New Jersey. Clean Water, New Jersey, is a DEP advisory group: http://www.cleanwaternj.org/, together, they have proposed a model ordinance for New Jersey communities: http://www.state.nj.us/dep/watershedmgt/DOCS/TMDL/Fertilizer%20Application%20Model%20Ordinance.pdf.

  11. Other Fertilizer Regulations • States, New Jersey • The model ordinance is not a state-wide law but a well-thought out template for communities to adopt for themselves. • We will post a copy for subcommittees to review.

  12. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Local Jurisdictions • Dane County, WI. Home of Madison and its famous lakes; concern is for fresh-water eutrophication from phosphates. • City of Sanibel Island, FL. Sandy soils and extensive turf cultivation; extensive estuaries and embayments. A good model: http://sanibelh2omatters.com/fertilizer/.

  13. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Local, continued • Sanibel, continued. An excellent web site explains the problem and their approach. They have a sophisticated system of education and certification. • Suffolk County, NY. The entire eastern end of Long Island; a glacial moraine similar to Nantucket with high-value real estate, enviable beaches, and a traditional farming community.

  14. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Suffolk, continued. Their web site is also good: http://www.suffolkcountyny.gov/Home/departments/EnvironmentandEnergy/FRI.aspx. The Suffolk personnel who drafted the Fertilizer Reduction Initiative, FRI, relied on the work and advice of Cornell agriculture scientists. • Westchester County, NY, has a sophisticated fertilizer regulatory scheme primarily for the control of phosphates.

  15. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Lessons for the Work Group • HPIC has done its home work and working from their draft saves us time and effort. • There are elements not in the draft that should still be considered. • While we are not alone in the US, we appear to be the first in MA to consider regulatory control of fertilizer application.

  16. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Observed Code Elements • Fertilizer should be • Mainly slow-release nitrogen (50% in FL and 70% elsewhere); • Zero % phosphate except when need demonstrated by soil test or when establishing new plantings; • Similar constraints apply to combination products; • No mention of foliar fertilizers. • Little discussion of synthetics vs organics

  17. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Observed Code • Application • Fertilizer should be applied when plants are growing; i.e. avoid periods of dormancy. In FL, this means no application in the summer months. • Amounts should be limited by plant need (soil test) or some small number (one or two) of pounds per 1000 sq. ft. per season.

  18. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Application, continued. • Avoid application before storm events that will lead to run-off or, in the case of sandy soils, rapid percolation below the root zone and into the groundwater system. • Do not apply within 25 feet of bodies of water; wetlands not mentioned. • Do not apply to impervious surfaces, i.e. clean up spills. • Do not allow to go into storm drains.

  19. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Observed Code Elements • Commercial (landscapers) and Institutional (government, golf courses, etc.) applicators (italics used in regs) • May need to be licensed or certified. The latter word is used when the license is granted only after demonstration of knowledge, typically through a test; • All should be competent or qualified, either by education or experience. • License may be separate or as part of a broader one for businesses or landscapers.

  20. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Observed Code Elements • Retailers • Must display appropriate signs on acceptable products; educational brochures distributed to fertilizer customers. • May be required to be licensed; • Should make zero-percent phosphate widely available. • Education • Web site available; brochures and signs and FAQs correspond in text.

  21. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Observed Code Elements • Education, continued • Courses on application practice made available to the public; on-line or face-to-face; fee charged. • Courses mandated for licensure. • Exemptions • All farms are exempted but their impacts may be covered by agricultural regs. • Some codes exempted government and institutional applicators

  22. Other Fertilizer Regulations • Observed Code Elements • Enforcement and Penalties • No great emphasis on this element. • One code suggested civil penalties of up to $500 per infraction; it did not indicate how infractions would be observed. • Monitoring did not appear to be discussed. • Reporting • At least one code asked that public reports on water quality be filed in the future.

  23. Other Fertilizer Regulations • A word of warning – Caveat • These summary notes are a beginning not an end. • Those of us who write drafts for the Nantucket code should go back to the original web sites for guidance on what they said and did. • Lee has been known to leave things out or get them horribly wrong!

More Related