1 / 48

IST programme INTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004

IST programme INTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004. Outline of presentation. Why IPPA 2004 ? Main findings Facts and figures Portfolio Reinforce European strengths Exploit new opportunities Ensure the co-evolution of technology and applications

thea
Download Presentation

IST programme INTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. IST programmeINTEGRATED PROGRAMME PORTFOLIO ANALYSIS 2004

  2. Outline of presentation • Why IPPA 2004 ? • Main findings • Facts and figures • Portfolio • Reinforce European strengths • Exploit new opportunities • Ensure the co-evolution of technology and applications • Future visions and emerging technologies (FET) • Support infrastructure development • SWOT analysis • The future • Portfolio analysis and impact observatory

  3. WHY IPPA 2004 ? • Contribute to impact analysis • Help define priorities for IST WP 2005-06 • Contribute to IST priorities in FP7 • Consolidation of call 1 and call 2 statistical analysis • Snapshot of the project portfolio for each SO • # of projects by instrument and budget • Budget distribution (%) per participating country • Budget for top 20 beneficiaries • Budget per organisation type • Objectives and planned deliverables • For each SO, coverage in terms of effort, actors and expected impact • SWOT analysis.

  4. Facts and Figures • Call 1 • Closed April 2003 – funding € 1070m • 236 projects negotiated and launched • Call 2 • Closed October 2003 – funding € 525m • 148 projects under negotiation or launched • Joint Call with production technologies • Closed April 2003 – funding € 60m • FET (Future and Emerging technologies) Open • Continuous call – funding € 60m

  5. IST Calls 2003-04 : Implementation • 1,9 out of 3,8 Billion € spent in calls in 2003-04 • More than 400 projects supported • Out of 2500 proposals received • More than 6500 participations • Oversubscription Funding per InstrumentIST Calls 1 & 2

  6. Participation (I)

  7. Participation (II)

  8. IST Calls 2003-04 : Participation Academia Industry Non-profit org.

  9. Participants Highlights • Organisations from Germany #1 in 15 out of 23 SOs • The Fraunhofer Ges. Institutes in top 20 in 21 SOs • University of Karlsruhe best funded university • Italian organisations #1 in 4 SOs • France #1 in 3 SOs • Industry top participants : Philips, CEA, Alcatel, Telefonica, France Telecom, Siemens, Ericsson and Nokia

  10. Top 20 participants • FRAUNHOFER GESELLSCHAFT • INTERUNIVERSITAIR MICRO-ELECTRONICA CENTRUM VZW • DAIMLERCHRYSLER AG • COMMISSARIAT A L'ENERGIE ATOMIQUE • SIEMENS AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT • FRANCE TELECOM • CENTRE NATIONAL DE LA RECHERCHE SCIENTIFIQUE • UNIVERSITAET KARLSRUHE (TH) • TELEFONICA • STMICROELECTRONICS SA • PHILIPS ELECTRONICS NEDERLAND B.V. • BRITISH TELECOMMUNICATIONS PLC • INSTITUTE OF COMMUNICATION AND COMPUTER SYSTEMS • INFINEON TECHNOLOGIES AG • TECHNICAL RESEARCH CENTRE OF FINLAND • CONSIGLIO NAZIONALE DELLE RICERCHE • KUNGLIGA TEKNISKA HOEGSKOLAN • DFKI GMBH • THALES COMMUNICATIONS S.A. • UNIVERSITAT POLITECNICA DE CATALUNYA

  11. IST Calls 2003-04 : Concentration • Concentration of effort and building critical mass • Total number of projects selected : 3 times less than FP5 for an equivalent budget • Average budget of Integrated Projects : 5 times larger than FP5 projects • Setting up & managing larger projects : a challenge

  12. IST Calls 2003-04 : Integration • More intensive collaboration between various actors • Integrated Projects: 2-3 times as many partners per project • From industry, academia and public research labs • Concern over SME participation • Integration of effort in an enlarged Europe important • International co-operation

  13. Lessons for WP 2005-06 preparation • Large oversubscription in some fields • “Networked Government, Networked Business”, “ICT forHealth”, “Technology Enhanced Learning/ Access to Cultural Heritage”, “software”, “Risk Management” and “Mobile applications”: Around 10% • Low SMEs participation • Call1: 16%; Call2: 17% • NoEs : 7%; IPs: 15%; STREPs: 24% • Integration of the ICT research effort in an enlarged Europe • Participation of Member States that joined the EU recently and of Associated Candidate Countries below expectations (3 to 4%) • International co-operation • Domain-specific approaches are needed

  14. Lessons on new instruments Observations coherent with conclusions of the Marimon panel. • Further concentration • More ambitious proposals (IPs) • STREPs continue to be a flexible and well understood instrument Issues concerning NoEs: • governing rules • optimal size of NoEs. • added-value wrt co-ordination actions or SSAs. • budgeting rules • practical implementation of “lasting integration”. • integration across disciplines or across borders. • lack of industrial involvement in NoEs.

  15. Portfolio analysis 130 MEuros 450 MEuros 120 MEuros 420 MEuros 480 MEuros

  16. Defining the SOs: Five main groups (1) • Reinforce leadership where Europe has demonstrated strengths, e.g. • mobile communications and services, broadband communications • micro-opto electronics & µsystems, • networked audiovisual systems... • Seize new opportunities that arise from the ‘AmI’ vision and address weaknesses / threats critical for its realisation, e.g. • multimodal interfaces, semantic-based knowledge handling,.. • embedded systems,... • Knowledge and computing GRIDs, • Security and dependability,…

  17. Defining the SOs: five main groups (2) • Continued support to leading / challenging applications, responding to emerging needs, e.g. • eHealth, eInclusion, eLearning and culture, • Entertainment and leisure content • business support tools, networked organisations,... • Support to research at the frontier of knowledge • FET open • FET proactive • Cognitive systems • Support to infrastructure development • Research networking test beds • Open development platforms • IST for safety in transport, risk management,..

  18. Reinforce leadership where Europe has demonstrated strength • Microelectronics • Microsystems • Mobile and broadband communications • Audio-visual systems and consumer electronics Objective : maintain and further develop Europe’s position on the global scale • improved structuring of research activities • continuity of action • standards and open environments • pushing the limits of technology

  19. Focus CMOS – Post CMOS: 89 MEuros

  20. FP 6-IST Call 1: Processes, Materials, Equipment & Devices - A European Nano-Electronics Cluster 12 projects of ca. 89 M€ funding... Materials & Defects Nano Devices & Architectures Virtual 300mm (Fl.Wafer)0 NanoCMOS & SINANO Si Processes & Devices for features down to 10 nm More Moore EUV 45/32/22 nm node Altern. BE opto on Si (PICMOS) Design&Technol. for compound PAs (TARGET) Altern. FE Ge & high k (ET4US) New Memory Concepts (Nosce Memorias) Litho-Metrology (Ocsli)

  21. Example: IP NANOCMOS Funding: 24.17 million euro (first phase of 27 months) Partners: STMicroelectronics, Philips, Infineon, IMEC, CEA-LETI, CNRS, FhG-IISB, ZFM, IBS, Isiltec, Magwel, ACIES. Objectives: • keeping Europe at the forefront of nano-electronics • pushing the limits of semiconductor performance and density • pioneering changes in materials, process modules, device architectures and interconnections, modelling and simulation work. • demonstrating the feasibility of 45nm CMOS technologies • exploratory research on critical issues for 32nm and 22nm technologies • aims at pilot manufacturing of 45nm technology in 2008-09 Part of a coordinated strategic effort: MEDEA+ proposal for second phase (integration and validation 45nm CMOS 300mm wafer) links with SINANO Network-of-Excellence (9,9 M€ funding, 3 years, 43 partners)

  22. Some Key European Technology Projects 1992 1993 1994 1995 1996 1997 1998 1999 2000 2001 2002 2003 2004 2005 ADEQUAT 0.35mm FE; 0.35mm BE ADEQUAT-1 ADEQUAT-2 0.25mm FE; 0.35mm BE ADEQUAT + COIN 0.18mm FE; 0.25mm BE ACE 0.18-0.15mm FE; 0.18mm BE DAMASCENE Copper inter. 100 nm FE HUNT MEDEA+ T201 90 nm Full Integr ARTEMIS 65 nm FE ULISSE Cu/low k 65 nm Full Integr. MEDEA+ T207 NESTOR 45/32/22 FE NANOCMOS 45demo+ 32/22 studies, followed by MEDEA+ 45 nm full int.

  23. Mobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3G 102 MEuro

  24. Different Cycles of Innovation Short cycles Short cycles – – up to up to ~ a year a year Dynamic evolution of services Dynamic evolution of services Services Services Regular updates of targets required Regular updates of targets required Medium cycles Medium cycles – – several years several years for IP based functions (e.g. for mobility) for IP-based functions (e.g. for mobility) Networks Networks operation Migration to IPv6 will take longer Systems B3G in Long cycles Long cycles – – up to up to a decade a decade Investigation and test of new radio technology Investigation and test of new radio technology Radio Radio Regulation and allocation of spectrum Regulation and allocation of spectrum Development of radio products Development of radio products Source: Mobile Technology Platform

  25. Mobile and Wireless Systems beyond 3G Dynamic network composition WWI AMBIENT Personal Area networks MAGNET Smart Antennas ACE (NoE) New instruments coverage Satellite overlay network MAESTRO SATNEX (NoE) End to end service delivery /Convergence DAIDALOS UWB systems PULSERS New Radio access for terrestrial systems Beyond 3G WINNER NEWCOM (NoE) Re-configurable radio and networks E2R

  26. Network context Content Pricing Mobility Management Information Adaptation Location Broadcast Information Multicast Resource Resource Resource Resource Resource Resource Metering Metering QoS QoS Security Security Monitoring Monitoring Monitoring Management Management Management fixed wireless infrastructure ad hoc Daidalos Application / Content Pervasive services framework and API Personalised Context adaptation Platform for Pervasive Applications information delivery and communication Rules and policy engine Context inference engine Personalisation user interfaces Service Provisioning Multimedia Session migration Conferencing Mobile data transfer Telephony - SIP Network management Mobility Network context context Content Content Pricing Pricing Mobility Mobility Management Information Information Adaptation Adaptation Location Broadcast Broadcast Signalling Location information Information Multicast Multicast Resource Monitoring Resource Management Metering Metering A4C A4C QoS QoS Security Security Mobile IPv6 Access Technologies DVB - T W - CDMA TD - CDMA Ethernet WLAN Bluetooth fixed fixed wireless wireless infrastructure infrastructure ad hoc ad hoc

  27. Broadband for All 85.4 MEuro

  28. OPERA (IP) MUSE (IP) ATHENA BROADWAN U-BROAD CAPANINA OBAN EURO-NGI (NoE) DAIDALOS FLEXINET E-PHOTON (NoE), SATLIFE ACE (NoE), GANDALF Convergence and Interoperability DIADEM Network- and Service- Management MESCAL, SEINIT MOME (CA) Monitoring and Measurement COCOMBINE (SSA) BREAD (CA) Economics of the Internet Broadband Projects Coverage Optical Core Network Technologies Broadband Access Technologies LASAGNE NOBEL (IP)

  29. Explore new opportunities that will lead to future markets • Opto-electronics • Embedded technologies • Semantic-based knowledge systems • Display technologies • Intelligent interfaces and environments • Security-related developments • GRID research

  30. Opto-electronics and Photonics 56 MEuro 13.5% SME estimate : 13%

  31. Coverage Telecom / infotainment Environment / Security / Other Health care / Life Science Industrial sectors Grand Challenges: Low-Cost High-Bandwidth to all - Terabyte storage Minimally-Invasive Diagnostics and Therapies, biophotonics Photonic sensors and imagers The Research Bricks: Solid-State Sources and Sources arrays Materials and microstructures Passive Components Photonic ICs Sensors The Cements: Integration Technologies Manufacturing Scalability Education and Training OPTIMIST-EPIC-COST, Athens 2004 H. Rajbenbach

  32. Environment Security Telecom Biophotonics / Med Consumer electronics, Lighting IP STREP NoE PICMOS MEPHISTO SynQPSK Storage e-PIXnet WAPITI MUFINS Organic LEDs SC/fiber lasers Blue lasers THz sources URANUS ATHOS + MICROHOLAS BRIGHT.EU TERANOVA FAST-ACCESS OLLA NITWAVE NEMO PHOREMOST FUNFOX Photonics: Technology coverage 16 selected proposals Microelec / Photonic integration Active / passive integration (Photonic Integrated circuits) Active components (Lasers and LED) Passive components Nanophotonics, Photonic crystals

  33. Example: TERANOVA Research: Terahertz Sensing & Imaging for: - Biotechnology (bio molecule and DNA sensing) - Healthcare (medical imaging) - Security (access control, explosives, bio-agents) - Process Monitoring (micro- nanoelectronics) Partnership: Large Industry (BAe Systems, Evotec, Renishaw, Thales) SMES (Alpes Lasers, Femtolasers, TeraView) Universities (Aachen, Delft, Durham, Leeds, Neuchatel, Freiburg Paris-VII, Pisa, Wien) Contract: IP, 4 years, 5 M€ grant H. Rajbenbach

  34. Embedded systems 58 MEuro

  35. IP Example: DECOS (19 Partners ) • Industrial Partners: Audi Electronics Venture, Airbus, EADS, Infineon, TTTech, Fiat, Profactor, Hella, Liebherr, Thales, Esterel • Research Centers: ARC Seibersdorf (Co-ordinator), SP Swedish Test. & Res. Inst. • Universities: TU Vienna, TU Darmstadt, TU Hamburg, Uni Kassel, Uni Kiel, Uni Budapest Duration: 3 Years, Budget: 14.3 Mio € EU Funding:9 Mio €

  36. DECOS Motivation Facilitate the systematic design & deployment of “integrated” electronic subsystems in embedded systems through: • Electronic Hardware Cost Reduction(fewer ECU’s, cables, connectors) • Enhanced Dependability by Design (clear partitioning of safety-critical and non safety-critical subsystems by design) • Reduced Development Costs (modular certification, reuse of software components, structured integration for communication & computational elements) • Diagnosis and Maintenance (diagnosis of transient and intermittent component failures) • Intellectual Property (IP) Protection

  37. DECOS Application Areas • Automotive • Aerospace • Railways • Industrial Control • Medical Systems • Autonomous Systems • DECOS will develop structured guidelines for domain-independant and technology independent integration.

  38. New opportunities: Focus Semantic-based knowledge systems 73 MEuro

  39. Leading and challenging applications responding to emerging needs • e-Government • e-Business • ICT for health care • e-Inclusion • e-Safety • e-Learning • e-Culture Objective: • Exploit new markets that will emerge from the deployment of societal applications • Bring technology closer to people’s needs

  40. EGov/eBusiness

  41. EGov/eBusiness participation eBusiness eGovernment

  42. Visibility COSPA Open Source Desktop Applications eMAYOR USE-ME.GOV INTELCITIES TERREGOV ONTOGOV QUALEG Mobile Payments HOPS SAFIR GUIDE External Web Services Deployments Natural Language Search WirelessFidelity and802.11b Semantic Web Biometrics Internal Web Services Smart Cards Location "Aware" Services and Technology Speech Recognition for Telephony and Call Centers E-Tags PKI Public Sector Vertical Applications Open Source Web Infrastructure Servers Peer-to-Peer Technologies VoIP FLOSSPOLS As of June 2003 Technology Trigger Peak of Inflated Expectations Trough of Disillusionment Slope of Enlightenment Plateau of Productivity Leading applications: Focus eGovernment Text-to-Speech and Speech Synthesis 42 Maturity

  43. FP6 Integrated Project e - e - Admin ICT functionalities to deliver an Integrated Open System City Platform (IOSCP)……….. Mobility System System Integrated Open System City Platform Local eG overnment Interface based on XML, XSL, VRML, eGIF & other standards Decision and analysis system supported by GIS and other analysis tools such as data mining, etc. Integrated multi - di mensional database with intelligent information management. e - Land - Includes: spatial data for buildings Use and land, economic, social, and System environmental data. e - Inclusion Wireless Wired System System Project Number 507860

  44. eHealth

  45. FET Open Proactive

  46. Conclusion: SWOT analysis (I) Strengths • FP6 orientations have been well received • Focus on Europe’s major strengths continues • FET remains an incubator • From short-term to long term and from generic to applied research. Weaknesses • High oversubscription in some fields • SME participation • Participation of New Member States • Participation of third countries

  47. Conclusion: SWOT analysis (II) Opportunities • Multi-disciplinarity • New Member States • Embedding of ICT in applications • Impact on EU-wide policies • Key technologies will help solve trust and security challenges • FET as a pathfinder Threats • New instruments need new and adequate ways of management and monitoring • Involvement of SMEs • IPR issues in large consortia • Concentration on short term issues • Role and performance of NoEs in some areas. • Fragmented value chains, still more integration.. • Different innovation cycles

  48. Next steps • Statistics: need to be refined • Content: analysis needs to be deepened: More semantics • IPPA as an integral part of wider Impact Analysis

More Related