1 / 10

Demand Side Working Group February 5, 2010

Demand Side Working Group February 5, 2010. Mary Anne Brelinsky EDF Trading North America. Antitrust Admonition. Demand Side Working Group Agenda. 2009 DSWG Goals. 2010 DSWG Goals. Suspension of Dynamic Scheduling During EEA. Update: Performance Protocol Revision to 6.10.5.4.

thu
Download Presentation

Demand Side Working Group February 5, 2010

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Demand Side Working GroupFebruary 5, 2010 Mary Anne BrelinskyEDF Trading North America

  2. Antitrust Admonition

  3. Demand Side Working Group Agenda

  4. 2009 DSWG Goals

  5. 2010 DSWG Goals

  6. Suspension of Dynamic Scheduling During EEA

  7. Update: Performance Protocol Revision to 6.10.5.4

  8. PUC Staff Comments to PRR Language Yellow highlights areas or points whose outcomes are either not clear or not covered at all.  Green blocks represent “passing” scenarios Rose highlighted blocks represent “failing” scenarios.  Objective to determine how Yellow outcomes are stated/defined in the current language.  If you agree that some or all are not clear or not covered, then this is where we would like to see language added.  Also, it may improve the overall PRR if the paragraphs somewhat follow the categories similar to the chart.  For example, create a “Portfolio Passes” heading with 2 outcomes (QSE passes, all LaaRs pass) itemized and set up a “Portfolio Fails” heading with 3 possible sub-headings (e.g. QSE at fault, LaaR at fault, Both QSE/LaaR at Fault) and the associated 2 outcomes itemized for each sub-heading.

  9. Performance Protocol Revision to 6.10.12.5 6.10.12.5 ERCOT Actions for Non-Compliance ERCOT may revoke any or all Ancillary Service qualifications of any QSE providing an Ancillary Service (s) for continued failure to comply with required performance standards. ERCOT may revoke the Ancillary Service qualification of any LaaR for failure to comply with the required performance standards. Specifically, if a LaaR that is providing RRS fails to respond with at least ninety-five-percent (95%) of its scheduled capacity within ten (10) minutes of an ERCOT Dispatch Instruction, that response shall be considered a failure. Two (2) LaaR performance failures within any rolling one (1) year period shall result in disqualification of that LaaR. After six (6) months of disqualification, the LaaR may reapply for qualification provided it submits a corrective action plan to ERCOT that identifies actions taken to correct performance deficiencies and the disqualified LaaR successfully passes a new actual deployment qualification test as specified in Section 6.10.2, General Capacity Testing Requirements. Failure to deliver energy resulting from a valid Dispatch Instruction is cause for ERCOT, at ERCOT’s option, to withhold payment for any Ancillary Services purchased and not delivered. TRE will make information relative to each QSE’s performance as well as ERCOT’s performance, available to Market Participants on a monthly basis, subject to the provisions of Section 1.3.1, Restrictions on Protected Information.

  10. Next Meeting and Schedule for 2010 • DSWG Scheduled Meetings and Meeting Details: • February 05, 2010 • March 05, 2010 • April 09, 2010 • May 07, 2010 • June 04, 2010 • July 16, 2010 • August 13, 2010 • September 10, 2010 • October 08, 2010 • November 05, 2010 • December 03, 2010

More Related