2.4k likes | 2.48k Views
INTRODUCTION CREATIONISM CONCERNS. ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009. INTRODUCTION CREATIONISM CONCERNS. ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009. INTRODUCTION CREATIONISM CONCERNS. ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009. INTRODUCTION CREATIONISM CONCERNS.
E N D
INTRODUCTION CREATIONISM CONCERNS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
INTRODUCTION CREATIONISM CONCERNS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
INTRODUCTION CREATIONISM CONCERNS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
INTRODUCTION CREATIONISM CONCERNS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
INTRODUCTION CREATIONISM CONCERNS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
INTRODUCTION CREATIONISM CONCERNS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
TEACHING EVOLUTION Evolutionary patterns and processes: a survey • EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM: • EVOLUTIONISM! 2. EVOLUTIONARY PROCESSES NATURAL & SEXUAL SELECTION, NEUTRALISM, COEVOLUTION 3. THE ORIGIN OF SPECIES SPECIATION MODES AND PROCESSES ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! DEFINING EVOLUTION MODIFICATION BY DESCENT ECOLOGICAL PARAMETER MACROEVOLUTION NATURAL SELECTION « STRUGGLE FOR LIFE » MICROEVOLUTION UNSPECIFIED INTERVAL OF TIME A, I DIVERSIFY B,C,D,G,G,K,L EXTINCT E, F LIVING FOSSILS ECOLOGICAL PARAMETER ECOLOGICAL SPACE ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION ESCHERICHIA COLI, A BIOLOGICAL MODEL • HUMAN DIGESTIVE TRACT • GRAM- BACTERIA, HAPLOID • EASY TO GROW IN SIMPLE MEDIA • SHORT GENERATION TIME • VIABLE AFTER STORAGE AT ULTRA-LOW TEMPERATURE • PREVENT FROM CROSS-CONTAMINATION WITH A GENE MARKER ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK Arabinose+(Glucose-) Arabinose-(Glucose+) ara- ara+ ara- ara+ ara- ara+ ara- ara+ ara- ara+ ara- ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK ara- ara- ara- 9.9ml ara- ara- ara- 1% 0.1ml+9.9ml ara+ ara+ ara+ ara+ ara+ ara+ • STARTING DATE 02.15.1988 • LIMITING MEDIUM (MINIMUM SALTS AND GLUCOSE) • 6.64 DIVISIONS/GENERATIONS PER DAY • 1994: 10,000 GENERATIONS • 2009: >>30,000 GENERATIONS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION EXPERIMENTAL FRAMEWORK 2.105 cells/ml ara+ (ara-) ara- (ara+) 24h Log2(3.107/2.105)~5.01 Log2(1.107/2.105)~3.91 Ratio~1.28 ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION AVERAGE FITNESS: MODIFICATION BY DESCENT • [0-2,000] – [2,000-10,000] • ADAPTATIVE CHANGE ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION CELLULAR SHAPE: MODIFICATION BY DESCENT • [0-2,000] – [2,000-10,000] • CELL SIZE INCREASE ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION ADAPTATION, NOT PROGRESS! • GROWTH ON 64 DIFFERENT MEDIA • ANCESTRAL PERFORMANCE ~ 1.0 ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION ADAPTATION, NOT PROGRESS! SIMMON CITRATE AGAR • IN 1 POPULATION ONLY, ABILITY TO USE CITRATE (cit+) • NOT CONTAMINANT: • ara- • T5s • T6r • pykF • nadR IDENTICAL TO THE ANCESTRAL POPULATIONS cit- cit+ ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION EVOLUTIONARY CONTINGENCY • HISTORICAL CONTINGENCY = DEPENDENT ON A PREVIOUS EVOLUTION OF A CERTAIN GENETIC BACKGROUND ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION DNA MOLECULES • DOUBLE HELIX • 4 BASES • TWO REVERSE COMPLEMENTARY STRANDS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION FROM DNA TO PROTEINS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
GENE EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION FROM DNA TO PROTEINS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION FROM DNA TO PROTEINS SYNONYMOUS MUTATIONS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION FROM DNA TO PROTEINS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION FROM DNA TO PROTEINS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION DNA SEQUENCE MODIFICATION BY DESCENT • SEQUENCING OF 36 RANDOM GENES + 4 CANDIDATE GENES AT GEN. 20,000 • MUTATIONS • MUTATORS / NON-MUTATORS • EVOLUTION IN PARALLEL AT THE LEVELS OF GENES A,B,C,D ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION DNA REPLICATION AND MUTATION ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION DNA REPLICATION AND MUTATION ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION MOLECULAR CONTINGENCY • BENEFICIAL MUTATIONS • EVOLUTION IN PARALLEL AT THE LEVELS OF GENES A,B,(C,D) ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION ADAPTATION IN A TEST TUBE HOMOGENOUS ENVIRONMENT • Pseudomonas fluorescens ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION ADAPTATION IN A TEST TUBE HETEROGENOUS ENVIRONMENT • Pseudomonas fluorescens • 7 DAYS IN 6ml OF KING’S MEDIUM B ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
FS WS EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION ADAPTATION IN A TEST TUBE HETEROGENOUS HOMOGENOUS SM ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION ADAPTATION IN A TEST TUBE • SM CLONE • CULTURE FOR 3 & 7 DAYS WITHOUT SHAKING • COMPETITION EXPERIMENTS ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! EXPERIMENTING EVOLUTION ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! FOLLOWING EVOLUTION IN THE FIELD DARWIN’S FINCHES http://planet-terre.ens-lyon.fr/planetterre/XML/db/planetterre/metadata/LOM-selection-VIH-pinsons-Darwin.xml ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! FOLLOWING EVOLUTION IN THE FIELD DARWIN’S FINCHES WARM Geospiza fortis
HERITABILITY ~ h² (0-1) EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! FOLLOWING EVOLUTION IN THE FIELD DARWIN’S FINCHES http://planet-terre.ens-lyon.fr/planetterre/XML/db/planetterre/metadata/LOM-selection-VIH-pinsons-Darwin.xml ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! FOLLOWING EVOLUTION IN THE FIELD GENERATION T (1976-1977) GENERATION T+1 (1978) SURVIVAL REPRODUCTION GENERATION T (1976-1977) GENERATION T+1 (1978) SURVIVAL REPRODUCTION ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
G. magnirostris Daphne Major island COMPETITEUR EVOLUTION vs CREATION: EVOLUTION! FOLLOWING EVOLUTION IN THE FIELD DARWIN’S FINCHES G. Fortis Daphne Major island Tribulus cistoides SECHERESSE PAS DE COUVEE G. Fortis Daphne Major island ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM HIERARCHICAL CLASSIFICATION EG. CARNIVORES, MAMMALIA ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM DEVELOPMENTAL SIMILARITIES DEVELOPMENT RECAP ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM DEVELOPMENTAL SIMILARITIES DEVELOPMENT RECAP ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
GENE EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM MOLECULAR SIMILARITIES ~UNIVERSAL GENETIC CODE ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM MOLECULAR SIMILARITIES ~UNIVERSAL GENETIC CODE VERTEBRATE MITOCHONDRIAL Code 2 Standard AGA Ter * Arg R AGG Ter * Arg R AUA Met M Ile I UGA Trp W Ter * INVERTEBRATE MITOCHONDRIAL Code 5 Standard AGA Ser S Arg R AGG Ser S Arg R AUA Met M Ile I UGA Trp W Ter * http://130.14.29.110/Taxonomy/Utils/wprintgc.cgi?mode=c ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM MOLECULAR SIMILARITIES GENOMIC REARRANGMENTS (CONTRASTING CARYOTYPES) ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM MOLECULAR SIMILARITIES GENOMIC REARRANGMENTS (SYNTENY MAPS) ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
Antp EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM MOLECULAR SIMILARITIES SEQUENCE SIMILARITIES (AT THE GENE AND GENE FAMILY LEVELS) KO 8 Hox GENES WILD ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM MOLECULAR (& DEVELOPMENT) SIMILARITIES SEQUENCE SIMILARITIES (AT THE GENE AND GENE FAMILY LEVELS) ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM MOLECULAR SIMILARITIES SEQUENCE SIMILARITIES (AT THE GENE AND GENE FAMILY LEVELS) ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM MOLECULAR SIMILARITIES SEQUENCE SIMILARITIES (AT THE GENE AND GENE FAMILY LEVELS) ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
1.23% ~ 35 Mb EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM MOLECULAR SIMILARITIES SEQUENCE SIMILARITIES (AT THE GENOMIC LEVEL) ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009
Les partisans de l'Intelligent Design soulignent la perfection de la mécanique des cellules, "les lignes d'assemblage, les centrales thermiques, les unités de recyclage, et les monorails miniatures qui véhiculent les éléments de part et d'autre de la cellule". Bien trop sophistiqué, selon eux, pour être le fruit du hasard ou de l'évolution. (..) "Combien d'évolutionnistes accepteraient l'idée que des changements aléatoires dans un programme informatique produisent une version améliorée ?, interroge l'un d'eux. Pourtant, c'est exactement ce qu'ils essaient de nous faire croire quand l'ADN subit une mutation au cours du processus d'évolution." 26.04.05 Inquiétante offensive des créationistes EVOLUTIONISM vs CREATIONISM UNINTELLIGENT DESIGN INTELLIGENT DESIGN: PRINCIPLES http://www.lasikmd.com/ctahiti/utils/eye-animations/eye-animations.fr.html?mode=print ludovic.orlando@ens-lyon.fr March 2009