60 likes | 95 Views
SPI versus SPI. Galina Hansen PhD Student Email : galina@itu.dk. The Problem. Assumption: Software Process Innovation (SPI) – the adoption of new tools and methods for software development (Gallivan, 1996) =
E N D
SPI versus SPI Galina Hansen PhD Student Email: galina@itu.dk
The Problem Assumption: • Software Process Innovation(SPI) – the adoption of new tools and methods for software development (Gallivan, 1996) = • Software Process Improvement(SPI) - a continuous and evolutionary approach to improve a software organization’s capability to develop quality software in response to customer requirements (McFeeley, 1996). • Software Product Innovation (SPI) – a product, a service or an idea that somebody perceives as new (Kotler, 1998) Software Process Improvement requires a Discipline that can have a negative impact on Creativity as a drive for innovation. A survival of a modern organization depends on how good they are to find the balance between Discipline and Creativity.
The Research Question • Why doesn’t efficiency inhibit innovation in software organizations? • If it does not - what impact does it have on an organizational strategy in a given context?
The Research Method • The method chosen for this study is Action Research. This method is widely recommended by IS researchers as an ideally appropriated method to the study of technology in a human perspective, and basically SPI is aimed at introducing process-oriented change and innovation into the human work place. Action research is an empirical research method, where a researcher’s goal is to help practitioners to solve a realistic problem as well as to give input and enrich a theory.
The Contribution • First, on knowledge on Software Process Improvement and Software Innovation by exploring the contradiction and similarity of those two paradigms. • Second, it will inspire for further research in order to explore how to find the balance between SPI (software process improvement) – SPI (software product innovation).
References • McFeeley, B. "IDEAL: A User's Guide for Software Process Improvement," CMU/SEI-96-HB-001, Software Engineering Institute, Pittsburgh, PA, February 1996. • Michael J. Gallivan (1996) Strategies for Implementing New Software Processes: An Evaluation of a Contingency Framework • Kotler, P. (1998) Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control