1 / 55

Corn and soybean production

Corn and soybean production. US Select Crop Value 2006 Billions of Dollars. $33.8. $19.7. $7.7. $0.2. $0.9. $0.9. Oats. Barley. Sor-ghum. Wheat. Soy-bean . Corn. NASS. Small grain production. Corn . Graze corn - alternative pasture Corn silage - dairy High moisture corn Grain .

turner
Download Presentation

Corn and soybean production

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Corn and soybean production

  2. US Select Crop Value 2006 Billions of Dollars $33.8 $19.7 $7.7 $0.2 $0.9 $0.9 Oats Barley Sor-ghum Wheat Soy-bean Corn NASS

  3. Small grain production

  4. Corn • Graze corn - alternative pasture • Corn silage - dairy • High moisture corn • Grain

  5. Top ten corn producing states, representing 84% of US production, 2006 (NASS)

  6. 152.6

  7. 2005-2006 U.S. corn use

  8. Top ten soybean producing states, representing 75% of US production. 2006 (NASS)

  9. 39.6

  10. US Soybean Acres Million acres 64.1 63.3

  11. 2007 Soybeans Planted Acres (1000) and change from previous year US 64,081 11,441

  12. 2007 Corn Planted Acres (1000) and change from previous year US 92,888 14,561

  13. Uses for soybean • Oil, human, 81% of edible fats in US • Soybean meal, 38.1 mil ton • Soydiesel, biodiesel • Ink • Crayons • Crop oil as surfactants • Wax • Aquaculture • Lubricants

  14. Why does the Midwest lead in grain production?

  15. Glaciers shaped the Midwest Late Wisconsinan - 10,500-30,000 yrs BP Pre-Illinoian - 500,000-2,500,000 yrs BP Illinoian - 130,000-300,000 yrs BP

  16. Estimated extent of the tall grass prairie, about 1800 Representing approx. 400 million acres

  17. Mollisols are the soils of grassland ecosystems, characterized by a thick, dark surface horizon. This fertile surface horizon, known as a mollic epipedon, results from the long-term addition of organic materials derived from plant roots.

  18. Image of NRCS

  19. Iowa’s (Midwest) Landscape Changed • Iowa’s tall grass prairie declined from12.6 million ha to 24,560 ha, a 99.9% decrease • “The tall grass prairies were erased before they were understood.” R. DeHaan

  20. Iowa’s (Midwest) Landscape Changed Causes: • Human settlement • Steel, moldboard plow • Water drainage of land • Agriculture production, WW II • Chemicals • Specialization • Urban development? • Biofuel production?

  21. historywired.si.edu/ images/objects/212a.jpg

  22. Prairie potholes

  23. Image of NRCS Tiling of prairies and wetlands to drain water for agriculture and development

  24. Yield increase (bu) with subsurface drainage

  25. (as N) Source: USGS, 2005

  26. Nitrate-Nitrogen Loss in Tile Drainage (Randall et al., 1997)

  27. Tillage systems for seedbed preparation:

  28. Production Cycle, corn and soybeans alternating years Oct. - Nov. Stalk chopping, deep ripping, fertility application, liming, seedbed tillage Dec. - Jan. Fields remain dormant April - May Pre-plant seedbed prep., fertility source, pre- plant herbicides, planting late April-end of May June - July Pre-emergent herbicides, post-emergent herbicides, mechanical weed control Aug. Soybean pest control Sept. - Oct Harvest

  29. Corn Soybeans Fertility needs • N - 0.0-1.2 lb/bu (56 lb/bu) 35.5 lb/bu (60 lb/bu) • P2O5 - 0.36 lb/bu 0.82 lb/bu • K2O - 0.26 lb/bu 1.00 lb/bu Water needs: 20-24 inches of water - 150-200 bu corn; 50-60 bu soybeans pH, liming needs:corn - 6.0-7.0; soybeans - 6.5-7.0

  30. Phosphorus recommendations • Site-specific management • uses grid sampling • recommendations are made for each 2.5-5.0 acre cell • image represents 152 acres

  31. Zone management • Soil sample according to • soil type • previous management • landscape • Zones are variable sizes • Less samples, less costly

  32. Problems: • Seemingly erratic weather, the only aspect of farming that is not controlled • High N and P levels in surface water, because of subsurface drainage and less filtering by the soil • Corn/soybean monoculture, little crop diversity on the landscape: • Less chance to disrupt pest cycles • Greater outbreaks • Large supplies of grain • Corn/soybean monoculture, little genetic diversity within each crop: • Greater outbreaks • Bioterrorism

  33. Open canopy much of the year • not getting the full benefits of sunlight • erosion, not an perennial system • unused nutrients, N and P

  34. New/more GMO products will increase corn/soybean monoculture • Bt control of corn rootworm • Continuous corn • GMO boycotts • More fertilizer, 30-50 lb N from soybean residue • Little profit, small margins • Commodity • More acres, larger farms • Consolidation of agricultural industry

  35. 2005 Price/bu Cost of production Corn $1.90 $2.83 Soybeans $5.05$6.76 2007 Price/bu Cost of production Corn $3.00+ $2.88 Soybeans $7.20+ $6.67 FM 1712, ISU Extension

  36. Issues Should we increase diversity? Yes, but how? • Markets • Crops • Stacked genes

  37. Increase diversity with markets: • Development of new products, increasing demand and more acres of monoculture • Export - some GMO boycotts • Non-food products - plastics, candles, fibers • New animal products - soybean meal for aquaculture • Ethanol

  38. Increase diversity with markets: • Identity preservation: • White corn, high oil corn • Clear hilum soybeans for human consumption • Non-GMO grain for foreign export • Low linolenic acid (low-lin) soybeans • Organic, fastest growing ag sector • “Farmaceuticals”, profit for a very few

  39. Increase crop diversity: • Perceived problems • No government payments • No market, little demand • Need different equipment, knowledge, skills • Little research • Another commodity crop from somewhere else • BIG paradigm change

  40. SAG systems • 5-yr rotation: C-Sb-C-Oats underseeded with legume-Legume or Sb-C-Sb-Oats underseeded with legume-Legume • Legumes as the fertility source, disrupt pest cycles • Use of organic fertility sources: animal manure, compost, green manures • Perennials, diversity in rooting systems, soil health, C sequestration, land cover

  41. Less herbicides results in more mechanical control and tillage, ?increasing erosion   • Using a living mulch or re-seeding annuals, full year cover • Less fertilizer needs using more realistic yield goals • Applying fertilizer just prior to plant uptake • Perennial grains, the Land Institute • Open pollinated (Op) corn, concern about trace level contamination of current seed stock with genetically modified seed, reduce dependence on the chemical/seed industry

  42. Crop rotation systems(Liebman et al) • 2-year rotation: corn–soybean (conventional management) • 3-year rotation: corn–soybean–triticale + red clover green manure (less fertilizer and herbicide, banded herbicides) • 4-year rotation: corn–soybean–triticale + alfalfa–alfalfa hay (less fertilizer and herbicide, banded herbicides) Composted beef manure applied to forage legumes before plowing

  43. Inputs to cropping systems (Averages for 2003–2005)

  44. Cropping system comparisons

More Related