1 / 18

Cost of coexistence in Germany

Cost of coexistence in Germany. Maarten Punt, Technische Universität München. Introduction. Statement of the EC (2003): “In principle, farmers should be able to cultivate the types of agricultural crops they choose – be it GM crops, conventional or organic crops” In the same document:

turner
Download Presentation

Cost of coexistence in Germany

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Cost of coexistence in Germany Maarten Punt, TechnischeUniversitätMünchen

  2. Introduction • Statement ofthe EC (2003): “In principle, farmers should be able to cultivate the types of agricultural crops they choose – be it GM crops, conventional or organic crops” • In the same document: “to provide European consumers with a real choice between GM and non-GM food"

  3. Introductionctd • In ordertopreventoutcrossingandadventitiouspresence -> Coexistencemeasures • BUT: • Different Coexistencemeasures = different costs • Different Coexistencemeasures = different effectiveness • Free choice = C.M. should not tipoverthebalance! • Case study in Germany

  4. GM cultivation in Germany • GM cultivation = outlawed • GM cultivation 2005-2008: Bt maize • # farmers involved = ±90 • Area wise <1% of total maize area in Germany • Obligatory registration @ government

  5. German cultivation in 2008 Standortregister, http://apps2.bvl.bund.de/stareg_visual_web/data.do

  6. Sampling strategy • Approached former Bt farmers through registration office • Approached former Bt farmers through Innoplanta (farmers organisation) • Approached neighbours through Bt farmers • Face to face interviews • Total Sample Size: 47 farmers. 27 Bt, 20 non-Bt

  7. Distribution Not sampled 1-4 farmers 5-9 farmers 10-15 farmers

  8. Our average farm

  9. Our average farmer

  10. Attitudesoffarmers

  11. Reasonsfor non Bt

  12. Coexistencemeasures: Burden

  13. Top 4

  14. Bottom 4

  15. Regression analysis: informingtheneighbours

  16. Correlationanalysis • Analyse correlationofLikertscalewithfarmcharacteristics (kendall‘s tau, non parametric)

  17. Summary • Small sample, but still sampledroughly 30% of all Bt-farmers in Germany • Results, so far, seemmostlyconsistent • Coexistencemeasuresoverallseem not tobotherfarmerstoomuch • Farm sizeis not always an importantcharacteristic

More Related