1 / 13

Ownership rights in Estonia

Ownership rights in Estonia. Priit Põllumäe Managing director Estonian Private Forest Union. CEPF Seminar on Baltic Countries Forestry Brussels, 26.06.2013. Briefly about us. ▪ The EPFU was founded in 1992 ▪ We´re a non-profit making organization

ulani
Download Presentation

Ownership rights in Estonia

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Ownership rights in Estonia Priit Põllumäe Managing director Estonian Private Forest Union CEPF Seminar on Baltic Countries Forestry Brussels, 26.06.2013

  2. Briefly about us... ▪ The EPFU was founded in 1992 ▪ We´re a non-profit making organization ▪ We unite about 30 regional forest owners associations all over Estonia ▪ About 4000 forest owners with ~250 000 ha of forest land

  3. ...and about private forest ownership ▪ ~97 000 forest owners in Estonia (0,2 ha < ) from which: ▪ 93 000 private individuals ▪ ~ 1 M ha of private forest ownership, yet fragmented: ▪ average property 10 ha ▪ 56% of NIPF-s own properties between 0,1-5 ha

  4. Why ownership rights ▪ Ownership rights as a cornerstone for land management ▪ Land management is a lifestyle, a way and a possibility to live in rural areas ▪ Indeed, we do have the CAP! But....

  5. Viability!! ▪ ….if ownership rights are not recognized or extremely limited viable land management is not possible!

  6. Infrastructure ▪ 1,58 ha of land: ▪ you pay land tax ~7-8 € annually ▪ the use is limited! ▪ but you have the right to get compensated 31,6 € cents ▪ Problem recognized by the Chancellor of Justice and the Supreme Court of Estonia!

  7. Nature protection ▪ Most importantly – forest owners are not against biodiversity protection ▪ Yet, numerous problems exist! ▪ practically no involvement of landowners in developing measures ▪ Natura support may continue, but what about the other areas?

  8. Taxation ▪ Land tax ▪ Income tax for NIPF owners is an incredible burden! ▪ deductions allowed but only for three years after a harvest ▪ an extremely difficult set of paperwork involved ▪ the system does not encourage forest owners to invest back into the land

  9. Hunting ▪ We have a new Hunting Act!! ▪ Forest owners might get a 10% compensation for damages that might occur ▪ Landowners representatives are involved in regional Hunting Councils (decisions made by consensus) ▪ No obligations for the hunters to make contracts with the landowners

  10. To conclude ▪ In many cases the situation and problems among all Baltic countries are very similar ▪ If ownership rights are not acknowledged or very limited the viability of land management is under threat

  11. If it is not viable... ▪ … we may as well forget the development of rural areas and the availability of sustainable, natural resources and their management

  12. It comes down to... ▪ … a decision: how to implement?! ▪ the reality is: educate and trust forest owners and they will provide timber, infrastructure, biodiversity, clean water, food, non-timber products etc. much more cheaper!

  13. priit.pollumae@erametsaliit.ee www.erametsaliit.ee

More Related