1 / 6

Data Comm Proposed DCL Services Deployment Waterfall

Data Comm Proposed DCL Services Deployment Waterfall. Presented at DCIT 25 By: Gregg Anderson Date: 7/18/2013. Waterfall Development – Equipage and Airline Overview. Key Sites Key Sites selected after analysis of 11 Options Selection Criteria

usoa
Download Presentation

Data Comm Proposed DCL Services Deployment Waterfall

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Data Comm Proposed DCL Services Deployment Waterfall Presented at DCIT 25 By: Gregg Anderson Date: 7/18/2013

  2. Waterfall Development – Equipage and Airline Overview • Key Sites • Key Sites selected after analysis of 11 Options • Selection Criteria • Availability of equipped A/C (Both currently equipped, and high probability of equipage by Key Site timeframe with FANS 1A+ and VDL2) • Local Constraints and Considerations • Schedule (# Parent ERAMs) • ERAM Lab Configurations • Remaining Site Waterfall • 3 regional deployment teams • Deployed by En Route Center

  3. Waterfall Development - Approach Notional Waterfall Implementation Waterfall Implementation Constraints Anticipated Equipage Profile Iterative Development Process

  4. Proposed ISD Configuration • ISD Configuration • Three ERAMs • Salt Lake Center -- ZLC • Atlanta Center -- ZTL • Houston Center -- ZHU • Three TDLS Tower Key Sites • Salt Lake City Airport -- SLC • Houston Intercontinental Airport -- IAH • Houston Hobby Airport -- HOU • Rationale • Key Site 1 selected due to co-location with ZLC National ERAM Site. Few aircraft ops but quickest to set up and lowest technical risk. • ZHU center was picked to best match needs of implementation, equipage, and stakeholders • Two airports in same center to reduce timeframe to ISD as well as testing constraints • Contains a diverse equipage options (United, Southwest, FedEx and UPS) • Operations large enough to reduce risk of low equipped flights

  5. In Service Decision DRAFT

  6. DRAFT Data Comm Proposed S1P1 Tower Waterfall DRAFT

More Related