1 / 10

HFCs: A Critical Link in Protecting Climate and the Ozone Layer

HFCs: A Critical Link in Protecting Climate and the Ozone Layer. A. R. Ravishankara Guus Velders Melanie Miller Mario Molina. Steering committee headed by Joseph Alcamo. Disclaimer: I am not talking as a co-Chair of WMO/ENEP SAP panel

valmai
Download Presentation

HFCs: A Critical Link in Protecting Climate and the Ozone Layer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. HFCs: A Critical Link in Protecting Climate and the Ozone Layer A. R. Ravishankara GuusVelders Melanie Miller Mario Molina Steering committee headed by Joseph Alcamo Disclaimer: I am not talking as a co-Chair of WMO/ENEP SAP panel Opinions expressed are mine and not necessarily those of NOAA

  2. Provisions of the MP led to decreases in ODS • The Montreal Protocol is working and the ODSs are declining. • HCFCs, the transition substitutes, are not contributing greatly to ozone depletion.

  3. Montreal Protocol’s role in safeguarding the ozone layer. WMO/UNEP SAP 2011 Newman et al. • MP prevented major global ozone layer depletion • Current ozone layer depletions are small, except for the polar spring time ozone depletions. • Ozone layer will recover in this century. Ozone hole will heal towards the end of this century.

  4. Montreal Protocol effectively protected climate • ODS-Phase out led to a drop of ~ 8.0 GtCO2eq per year (1988 -2010). • The avoided annual ODS emission (~ 10 Gt CO2eq in 2010 alone) • - x5 the Kyoto target for 2008-2012 (1st commitment period). • ODS decrease: one of the largest intentional global GHG emission reductions to date

  5. Montreal Protocol “led” to HFC use • MP successfully phased out CFCs and is phasing out HCFCs. • Phase out done via use of substitute chemicals or other approaches • HFCs are the main replacements in many ODS applications

  6. Use of HFCs is increasing • Consumption of HFCs is increasing rapidly • Consequent atmospheric growth rate of some HFCs are increasing very rapidly (some as much as 10% per year) • The current contributions of HFCs to radiative forcing is still small (<1% of GHGs)

  7. Climate benefits of Montreal Protocol may be lost because of growth in HFCs • Unabated, future HFC emissions may offset climate benefit of MP. • HFC emissions expected could be ~3.5 to 8.8 GtCO2eq in 2050. • Roughly equivalent to: • - ODS annual emissions drop of 8.0 GtCO2eq per year for 1988 -2010 • - 7 to 19% of the CO2 emissions in 2050 (SRES) • - 18 to 45% of CO2emissions for the 450 ppm CO2. • There is, of course, inherent uncertainty in such projections.

  8. HFCs contribution to climate change by future emissions can be large • Unabated, future HFC contribution radiative forcing can be large. • Radiative forcing by future HFC emissions can be ~25% of that of CO2 future emissions (SRES scenarios). • Future HFC emissions can significantly hinder the 450 ppm stabilization target.

  9. Low GWP-HFCs can retain climate benefits of MP. • Currently HFC contrbute <1% of the total radiative forcing. • HFCs are not all the same! Many HFCs (with shorter lifetimes) have very low GWPs. • There do not appear to be other major environmental problems with the use of very low GWP HFCs. • Possible to retain a <1% contribution in 2050 using low-GWP HFCs (GWP <20) and other alternatives, even for the upper range emissions Scenarios.

  10. Summary • MP effectively protected climate. • HFCs were introduced mostly because of MP • Currently HFCs are not significant for climate forcing • Future climate forcing by HFCs can be very large because of using high-GWP HFCs • There are many ways to reduce the climate influence of high-GWP HFCs Thank you for your attention & Over to Dr. Melanie Miller

More Related