1 / 20

Considering the Student: The Unacknowledged Vector in Assessment

Considering the Student: The Unacknowledged Vector in Assessment. Robert T. Mundhenk AAACL Conference 9 April 2009. Planning Assessment:. Internal Structures Coordination Faculty and Staff Involvement Instruments Reporting Mechanisms Integration into Governance and Decision-making.

vanna
Download Presentation

Considering the Student: The Unacknowledged Vector in Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Considering the Student: The Unacknowledged Vector in Assessment Robert T. Mundhenk AAACL Conference 9 April 2009

  2. Planning Assessment: • Internal Structures • Coordination • Faculty and Staff Involvement • Instruments • Reporting Mechanisms • Integration into Governance and Decision-making

  3. BUT WHERE’S THE STUDENT IN ALL THIS?

  4. The Student as Data Point • We assume: • A large degree of homogeneity among students • Student cooperation in assessment processes • Students fit traditional, decades-old models • Learning skills fit traditional, centuries-old models • Aggregated information is meaningful for planning • Our control of the process of assessment

  5. The Student as Decider • Standardized instruments like NSSE and CAAP: extra commitment of time with no “reward” • Internal assessments and surveys: extra commitment of time with no “reward” • Student performance on SLOs is center of all assessment practice, yet we assume students are simply data points

  6. Do We Control the Process? • To some degree, in embedded assessments, capstone courses, internships, clinical experiences, and the like—because students see the work as meaningful • In other areas, the extent of our control of student effort and student work in demonstrating their achievement of student learning outcomes is dubious at best • Effective assessment needs both understanding of and participation by the students who will demonstrate their achievement of SLOs

  7. The Student as Vector: Involvement in Assessment • Understanding learning and assessment from the student’s perspective leads to more meaningful and usable assessment data • Meaningful assessment strategies have to be important to both student and institution • Student performance depends on student engagement, so assessment processes should see the student as a collaborator in improving learning

  8. THREE KEY QUESTIONS: • HOW DO OUR STUDENTS DIFFER FROM THE STUDENTS WE WERE? • HOW DO OUR INSTITUTIONS DIFFER FROM THE INSTITUTIONS WE ATTENDED? • HOW HAS THE LEARNING ENVIRONMENT CHANGED?

  9. How Are Students Different—as Learners? • Students learn—and think about learning—differently • Blame Bert and Ernie for part of the difference • Early learning patterns value: • Immediacy • Brevity • Interactivity • Reactivity • Learning as Gratification

  10. How Are Students Different—as Learners? • Accommodating learning “styles” is less the issue than understanding new ways of thinking and communicating • Internet research replaces the stacks • Wikipedia replaces Britannica • Facebook and Twitter partially replace conventional social interaction and engagement • Ours is a world of digital natives

  11. How Are Students Different? • Students are increasingly diverse: • Race and ethnicity • Gender • Class • Age • Academic context • Preparedness • Employment status • External pressures

  12. How Are Students Different? • Students are consumers, more likely to see the college experience as a transaction than as a transformation • Students are likely to concentrate solely on college less than in the past because of jobs, families, and other obligations

  13. How Are Institutions Different? • Much less autonomy: accountability to various stakeholders, including parents, boards, and legislators • Many more reporting requirements: transparency requires communication • Much more variable “subjects” (students)

  14. How Has the Learning Environment Changed? • Technology • Multiplicity of goals and outcomes, determined by students and stakeholders rather than institutions • Wide range of academic ability and interest

  15. Yet Many Old Ways Remain • Discipline-based learning • Traditional formats • Implicit valorizing of traditional student life ways • Traditional assessment assumptions and strategies • Reductiveness of data-collection processes • Relative meaninglessness of criteria used to judge institutional effectiveness

  16. How Do We Produce Meaningful Assessment? • Stop pretending that learning occurs in a closed, controllable environment—but establish systems that work across the institution • Plan to deal with variability of data and sources—but aim at consistency as well • Engage students not only in the process of learning but also in the process of assessment

  17. And How Do We Engage Students in Assessment? • Informing them of outcomes and expectations • Incorporating their strategies for learning and communicating in our work with them • Aiming at “deep learning” • Incorporating assessments in student assignments frequently, deliberately, and openly

  18. How Do We Engage Students in Assessment? • Showing them that their engagement has an effect, beyond vague promises of improvement • Making them active elements in the process rather than passive subjects of institutional research • Helping them understand the connection between their learning in a course or activity and institutional goals for them

  19. And How Might This Happen in Arkansas?

  20. Robert T. Mundhenk • Consultant in Higher Education Assessment • asmt357@aol.com

More Related