1 / 70

Andrews University School of Education Assessment Report — 2012-2013

Andrews University School of Education Assessment Report — 2012-2013. Overview of SED Departments & Programs Assessment Report/Summary of Data Break for Dinner Job Placements of Recent Grads MTTC Score Trends “Closing the Loop”—Plans for Improvement. Outline of Annual Report.

vanya
Download Presentation

Andrews University School of Education Assessment Report — 2012-2013

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Andrews UniversitySchool of EducationAssessment Report—2012-2013

  2. Overview of SED Departments & Programs • Assessment Report/Summary of Data • Break for Dinner • Job Placements of Recent Grads • MTTC Score Trends • “Closing the Loop”—Plans for Improvement Outline of Annual Report

  3. Teaching, Learning & Curriculum • BSELED (Bachelor of Science in Elementary Education) • Elementary Certification • Secondary Certification • BS with Secondary Certification • MAT (Master of Arts in Teaching) • MA EdS, EdD, PhD in Education—Curriculum and Instruction (C&I) Programs in the SED

  4. Graduate Psychology and Counseling • MS in Special Education—Learning Disabilities • MA in School Counseling • MA in Community Counseling Programs (cont’d)

  5. Graduate Psychology and Counseling • MS in Special Education—Learning Disabilities • MA in School Counseling • MA in Community Counseling • MA in Clinical Mental Health Counseling • EdSin School Psychology • MA, EdD, PhD in Educational Psychology • PhD in Counseling Psychology Programs (cont’d)

  6. Leadership • Educational Leadership (K-12): Graduate Certificate, MA, EdS, EdD, PhD • Higher Education Administration: MA, EdS, EdD, PhD • Leadership: Undergraduate Certificate, MA, EdS, EdD, PhD Programs (cont’d)

  7. 2012-2013 Candidate Enrollments

  8. 2012-2013 Enrollments (cont’d)

  9. 2012-2013 Enrollments (cont’d)

  10. 2012-2013 Enrollments (cont’d) Total Enrollment = 470

  11. Student Outcomes • Program Quality • Faculty Assessment Report of Assessment Data

  12. Teaching, Learning & Curriculum (TLC) • Graduate Psychology & Counseling (GPC) • Leadership (LEAD) Student Outcomes by Department

  13. Teacher Education Course Assessments • 20+ assessments (rubrics), lowest mean rating 4.17/5.00 • Over 90% of all ratings at least 3/5 • CAS course grades: • 14 disciplines, 300+ students • most ratings over 4.00 (mean) • 2 disciplines under 4.00 • biology (3.86) & math (3.87) • In 7 disciplines, 100% of students rate at least 3/5 Student Outcomes—TLC

  14. Teacher Education (MTTC Scores) • MTTC = Michigan Test of Teacher Education • for Content Area Certification • Reported in 3-year blocks (2009-2012) Student Outcomes—TLC

  15. MTTC Content Area, 2009-2012

  16. MTTC Content Area, 2009-2012

  17. MTTC Content Area, 2009-2012 (cont’d)

  18. MTTC Content Area, 2009-2012 (cont’d)

  19. MTTC Content Area, 2009-2012 (cont’d)

  20. Curriculum & Instruction • In 9 assessment rubrics, lowest mean rating 4.77/5.00 • 100% of all ratings at least 3/5 Student Outcomes—TLC

  21. Assessment Data Across All GPC Programs • In 14 assessment rubrics, lowest mean rating 3.54/5.00 • For all assessments except 2, > 90% of all ratings at least 3/5 • In 6 assessments, 100% at least 3/5 Student Outcomes—GPC

  22. Educational Leadership • In 10 assessments, lowest mean rating 4.48/5.00 • For all assessments, more than 90% of all ratings at least 3/5 Student Outcomes—LEAD

  23. Leadership (Portfolio Assessments) • Across 14 competencies, lowest mean rating 3.14/5.00 • >98% of all ratings at least 3/5 Student Outcomes—LEAD

  24. SED Overall • Alumni Survey (2010-2011) • N = 19 • 4.05/5.00 (mean) on 16 questions addressing program quality • Program Quality by Department • Teaching, Learning & Curriculum • Graduate Psychology & Counseling • Leadership Program Quality

  25. Course Evaluations, Spring 2013 Program Quality—TLC N = 158

  26. Course Evaluations, Spring 2013 (cont’d) Program Quality—TLC N = 158

  27. Senior Exit Survey, Teacher Education (2012-2013) Program Quality—TLC • Seniors (n = 14) rated program/faculty at least 3.75/5.00 (mean) on all indicators except one. • 3.50 (mean) for “There were adequate specialized equipment (e.g. computers, instruments, lab supplies, etc.).” • Similar to ratings across the University.

  28. Course Evaluations, Spring 2013 Program Quality—GPC N = 173

  29. Course Evaluations, Spring 2013 (cont’d) Program Quality—GPC N = 173

  30. Course Evaluations, Spring 2013 Program Quality—LEAD N = 110

  31. Course Evaluations, Spring 2013 (cont’d) Program Quality—LEAD N = 110

  32. Course Evaluations • Advisor Evaluations • Senior Exit Survey Faculty Assessment

  33. Course Evaluations • N = 464 (all SED) • 4.33/5.00 = mean rating on 9 questions related to the instructor • Highest: “The instructor was sensitive to and respectful of all people” (4.49) • Lowest: “Timely, thoughtful, and helpful feedback was provided on tests and other work” (4.16) Faculty Assessment

  34. Advisor Evaluations • Difficulty in collecting data • Revised process to begin March 2014 • 2012-2013: Only Leadership data • N = 25 • All LEAD advisors 4.50/5.00 (mean) on 10 of 14 indicators • Lowest:“My advisor responds within two business days to my e-mail and/or telephone messages” (4.15) • Highest:“My advisor is courteous and respectful” (4.92) Faculty Assessment

  35. Senior Exit Survey • Teacher Education (undergrads only) • N = 14 • 4.50 (mean) on6 of 7 faculty-related indicators • Lowest:4.00 for “Faculty used technology effectively to enhance their teaching” • (cf. 4.10 across all Andrews seniors) • Not so bad! Faculty Assessment

  36. Senior Exit Survey (cont’d) • Lowest:4.00 for “Faculty used technology effectively to enhance their teaching” • (cf. 4.10 across all Andrews seniors) • Not so bad! • Highest:4.86 for 2 indicators • “Faculty members showed genuine interest in each student” • “Faculty taught me how Christian faith and ethics relate to my field” Faculty Assessment

  37. Dinner Time

  38. Teacher Education Graduates

  39. Teacher Education Graduates (cont’d)

  40. 2012-2013 Teacher Education Graduates (cont’d)

  41. Teacher Education Graduates (cont’d)

  42. Teacher Education Graduates (cont’d)

  43. Michigan Test of Teacher Certification for subject areas • Reported in 3-year blocks • 2006-2009 is missing • 6-Year Trends by Subject/Program MTTC Score Trends

  44. MTTC Score Trends

  45. MTTC Score Trends

  46. MTTC Score Trends

  47. MTTC Score Trends

  48. MTTC Score Trends

  49. MTTC Score Trends

  50. MTTC Score Trends

More Related