1 / 14

Objectives

Objectives . Assess information on Electoral College, and draw your own conclusions as to whether or not it should be reformed. Question: Should the Presidency be decided by popular vote of all citizens?. Structure of Electoral College.

watt
Download Presentation

Objectives

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Objectives • Assess information on Electoral College, and draw your own conclusions as to whether or not it should be reformed. • Question: Should the Presidency be decided by popular vote of all citizens?

  2. Structure of Electoral College • # Electors per state = # Members of Congress per state (Reps + 2 Senators) • 538 Electoral votes (270 needed for win) • Winner Takes All: • All electors in a state vote for whoever wins the state • except Maine & Nebraska (district system) • How many Electors does Pennsylvania have?

  3. Impacts on the Political System? • Con: “Faithless” Electors • Pro/Con: “Winner Takes All” impacts: • Candidates may focus on large “swing” states & ignore other states • Con? Discourages 3rd parties who rarely get EC votes (e.g. Green & Libertarian parties) • Pro? Fosters 2-Party System (stability & moderation)

  4. 1968 Election: George Wallace ran as an Independent. With 13.5% of the national popular vote, he won 45 Electoral College votes. His regional support base was the reason. 1992 Election: Ross Perot ran as an Independent. With 18.9% of the national popular vote, he won 0 Electoral College votes. Source: presidentelect.org

  5. CON: Candidate may win despite losing the popular vote, due to “winner takes all” • How is that possible?? • 1st Scenario: • Winning candidate wins by narrow margins in several states, but has big losses in other states • 2000: Bush 271 vs. Gore 266 • Gore had over 500,000 more popular votes than Bush, but lost by 537 votes in Florida • Election results since 1964 Florida Recount

  6. CONS: Candidate may win despite losing the popular vote If no Presidential candidate wins a majority… House of Rep’s chooses Pres. from top 3 (Each state gets only one vote) • Senate chooses Vice President from top 2 • If no President by Jan. 20, then presidential succession order =Speaker of House, President Pro Tempore, Secretary of State, other Cabinet Secretaries

  7. Pros: • Promotes Federalism: • Must campaign by states • can’t win by focusing only on a few regions • smaller states get a boost • Fosters Intentions of Founding Fathers • It was a Constitutional Compromise • Fosters Two-Party System • More stability (fewer 3rd party upsets)

  8. Pros? Cons? • Con: Public Opinion (more people oppose it) • Pro? Con?: Votes of All Citizens Don’t Count Equally (Smaller states “overrepresented”?) • E.g. 2004: • 1 WY Elector = 165,101 votes • 1 CA Elector = 617,000 votes • Con: Lack of Legitimacy for officeholder if they won election, but lost the popular vote

  9. Reform Proposals: • 1) District Plan Pros/Cons: • No winner takes all • Presidential election decided by gerrymandered district maps • Winner of Popular vote could still lose election • No Constitutional Amendment required, but up to each state

  10. Reform Proposals • 2) Proportional Plan • % of state popular vote = % of Electors given • No winner takes all • Winner of popular vote could still lose • More 3rd party votes increase chances of vote being sent to House of Rep’s

  11. Reform Proposals • 3) Direct Popular Election • All votes count equally • Clear winner = leader with legitimacy • Hard to amend Constitution • Costs too much $ to campaign?

  12. Choices: • 1) Keep Electoral College as is • 2) District Plan • 3) Proportional Plan • 4) Direct Popular Election • Directions: • Discuss pros/cons of each. • Choose your corner • Prepare arguemtns to persuade people • Prepare arguments for informal debate

  13. Should the Electoral College be reformed? If yes, how?Informal Debate:* Make a list of pros and cons.* Choose a side.* Defend and Explain your position.

More Related