1 / 21

Group Intention effects on REG

Group Intention effects on REG. Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005. From Margins of Reality.

wendi
Download Presentation

Group Intention effects on REG

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Group Intention effects on REG Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  2. From Margins of Reality “…Deliberate investigations of group interactions with physical systems and processes, beginning with multiple operator experiments…or others testing various implications of the model for group behavior, could be instructive.”(p.328) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  3. Overview of Method • Compile group operator data. • ShortREG Analysis Panel • Calculate basic statistics: mean, standard deviation. • Graph REG output. • Implement Excel to compute Chi2. • Conduct Chi2 test on PSY/ORF 322 (2005): high, low, baseline, total. • Analyze results. Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  4. Our Working Data *A class of second graders operated series #10 of HILLSBOR.704 Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  5. Aggregate Means Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  6. Aggregate Standard Deviations Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  7. Chi2 Test Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  8. Calibration (Older) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  9. Calibration (Recent) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  10. Calibration (Total) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  11. Hillsboro (2nd Grade, 2000) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  12. Hillsboro (4th Grade, 1999) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  13. Hillsboro (4th Grade, 2000) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  14. Hillsboro (4th Grade, 2001) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  15. Hillsboro (Total) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  16. Tower Hill (High School) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  17. PSY/ORF 322 Class (1998) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  18. PSY/ORF 322 Class (2005) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  19. PSY/ORF 322 Class (Total) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  20. PSY/ORF 322 Detailed Data (2005) Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

  21. Chi2Analysis, Conclusions • Notes: • For both groups of PSY/ORF 322 classes there is a very evident mean shifting in the opposite direction of intention. • This is also the case for the aggregate data of the Hillsboro school students and the one class of high school students from Tower Hill. • While it would be convenient to attribute this effect to the machine, calibration data indicates a nearly perfect mean and standard deviation without intentions. Dara Deshe, Eugene Gokhvat – PSY/ORF 322 – 05/05/2005

More Related