1 / 46

Airborne Studies of Atmospheric Dynamics

Airborne Studies of Atmospheric Dynamics. Thomas R. Parish Department of Atmospheric Science University of Wyoming. Newton’s Second Law – The Equation of Motion. Total Derivative. Local Derivative. Advection (Inertia) Term. Horizontal Pressure Gradient Force. Coriolis Force.

willa-dale
Download Presentation

Airborne Studies of Atmospheric Dynamics

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Airborne Studies of Atmospheric Dynamics Thomas R. Parish Department of Atmospheric Science University of Wyoming

  2. Newton’s Second Law – The Equation of Motion Total Derivative Local Derivative Advection (Inertia) Term Horizontal Pressure Gradient Force Coriolis Force Geostrophic component Ageostrophic component

  3. Geostrophic Wind • Balanced flow state • Purely rotational (non-divergent) • Often the largest component of wind • Relatively inert component of the wind Vg L H P C

  4. Ageostrophic Wind • Unbalanced flow state • Often contains significant divergent component • Generally small component of wind • Isallobaric and inertia/advective components generally largest • Important forcing component of the wind

  5. Measurement of Geostrophic Wind • Write Equation of Motion in isobaric coordinates • Variation of height on a pressure surface proportional to horizontal pressure gradient force • Airborne applications – use autopilot

  6. Pre-GPS Era (before 2004) • Radar Altimeter measurements provide height above surface • Terrain maps (digital) provide terrain height assuming geographic position known with high accuracy • Height of isobaric surface is sum of above signals

  7. Problems: • Two signals (radar altimeter heights, terrain height) large and of opposite sign • PGF is the sum of those terms, being quite small and noisy • Potential errors in both radar altimeter height, terrain height • “Artifact” problem for radar altimeter • Footprint issue for altimeter • Uncertainties in aircraft position estimates • Issues with terrain height data sets • Resulting uncertainty with “terrain registration”

  8. Example: Great Plains Low-Level Jet • Nocturnal summertime jet maximum ~400 m agl • Competing theories for LLJ formation • Blackadar frictional decoupling • Holton sloping terrain influence

  9. Results of PGF measurements at lowest level Flight Strategy – Repeating isobaric legs

  10. Conclusions: • Isallobaric component of wind ~4 m/s at level maximum wind • Large changes in turbulent intensity at jet level • Blackadar frictional decoupling dominant mechanism in • forcing Great Plains LLJ

  11. GPS Era • Avoid “terrain registration” issues • GPS provides a means to accurately map isobaric surface • Position errors from standard GPS receiver insufficient to • resolve isobaric slopes • Differential GPS required • Requires fixed base station • Position errors at base station can be used to correct • position errors for rover platform (aircraft) • Importance of acceptable satellite constellation (5 or 6?) • Position accuracy on order of decimeters • Relative accuracy probably much better

  12. GPS04 Study – Arcata CA • Frequent summertime LLJ at top of marine boundary layer • Comparison with altimetry-derived geostrophic wind • Tested GrafNav differential processing software

  13. GPS04 LLJ Example • Isobaric east-west flight leg south of Cape Mendocino • Nearly identical signals • dGPS calculations of Vg from most legs within 1 m/s altimetry Vg • GPS04 validated dGPS technique

  14. Application of dGPS on atmospheric dynamics – Coastally Trapped Wind Reversals (CTWRs, also CTDs, southerly surges) 0000 UTC 22 June - 0000 UTC 26 June 2006

  15. CTWR Forcing Issues • Kelvin Wave • Cross-coast PGF • Variations in MBL Height • Topographic Rossby Wave • Topographically-Trapped Wave • Density Current • Synoptic-scale response • Ageostrophic acceleration • Importance of synoptic-scale pressure field

  16. 23 June 2006 Example • Isobaric east-west • flight leg • Little detectable • cross-coast PGF

  17. 23 June 2006 Example

  18. 23 June 2006 Example

  19. 23 June 2006 Example

  20. 24 June 2006 Example

  21. 24 June 2006 Example

  22. 23-25 June 2006 CTWR Conclusions • CTWR density current • No Kelvin-wave features observed during this event • Active propagation phase highly ageostrophic • Little detectable cross-coast PGF at any time during the life history • Onset and propagation dependent on synoptic pressure field

  23. Application: CloudGPS08 • May-June 2008, flights over high plains WY, NE, CO • Measure horizontal perturbation pressures associated with clouds • Clouds mostly in cumulus congestus phase • Differential GPS dependent on accurate measurement of static pressure

  24. Application: CloudGPS08 (May 21)

  25. Isobaric Height Liquid Water Content (g/kg) u v W (m/s) Horizontal Pressure Perturbation (mb) θV

  26. Liquid Water Content (g/kg) W (m/s) Horizontal Pressure Perturbation (mb)

  27. Application: CloudGPS08 (June 17)

  28. Leg 1 Liquid Water Content (g/kg) Isobaric Height W (m/s) u v Horizontal Pressure Perturbation (mb) θV

  29. Leg 2 Liquid Water Content (g/kg) Isobaric Height W (m/s) u v Horizontal Pressure Perturbation (mb) θV

  30. Leg 3 Liquid Water Content (g/kg) Isobaric Height W (m/s) u v Horizontal Pressure Perturbation (mb) θV

  31. Leg 4 Liquid Water Content (g/kg) Isobaric Height W (m/s) u v Horizontal Pressure Perturbation (mb) θV

  32. Leg 5 Liquid Water Content (g/kg) Isobaric Height W (m/s) u v Horizontal Pressure Perturbation (mb) θV

  33. Leg 1

  34. Leg 2

  35. Leg 3

  36. Leg 4

  37. Leg 5

  38. Application: Ocean Surface Topography • Differences between GPS height, radar altimeter signal measure of ocean surface topography

  39. Application: Ocean Surface • Topography • Reciprocal legs along 40.8°N • Consistent pattern of height • differences • Validate using multiple altimeters? • Gulf Stream flights?

  40. Application: Ocean Surface • Topography • Reciprocal legs along 40.8°N • Consistent pattern of height • differences • Validate using multiple altimeters? • Gulf Stream flights?

  41. Application: Ocean Surface • Topography

  42. Conclusions • dGPS can provide precise mapping of aircraft height • Base station data rate 1 Hz • Baseline ~ 100 km? • dGPS accuracy within decimeters? • Relative accuracy higher? • Accurate measurement of static pressure permits PGF calculations • Assessment of atmospheric dynamics for a wide variety of flows Thanks to Dave Leon, Larry Oolman, Dave Rahn and Eric Parish

More Related