1 / 20

Outline for Today’s Lecture: Sociology of Education

Outline for Today’s Lecture: Sociology of Education. Introduction: What is the purpose of education? Theories of Sociology of Education Functionalist Conflict Bowles & Gintis Randall Collins Pierre Bourdieu Interpretive/Symbolic Interactionist Inequality and Schooling. Thought Question.

xander
Download Presentation

Outline for Today’s Lecture: Sociology of Education

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Outline for Today’s Lecture: Sociology of Education • Introduction: What is the purpose of education? • Theories of Sociology of Education • Functionalist • Conflict • Bowles & Gintis • Randall Collins • Pierre Bourdieu • Interpretive/Symbolic Interactionist • Inequality and Schooling

  2. Thought Question • What is the purpose of education? • Why do we send kids to school? What do we expect and want them to learn? • Why would someone decide NOT to send their kid to school?

  3. Bowles and Gintis: Correspondence Principle “…by structuring social interactions and individual rewards to replicate the environment of the workplace”, schools are able to accomplish the goal of preparing “people for adult work rules by socializing people to function well and without complaint in the hierarchical structure of the modern corporation” (Bowles and Gintis 2002, see also 1976).

  4. Bowles and Gintis: How Schools Reproduce Inequality • Channel students into different levels in the capitalist work hierarchy in a way that corresponds with their family background • Socialize students to have the skills and attitudes appropriate to those different levels • Legitimate or justify these processes of allocation and socialization as in the interest of all

  5. Kindergarten as Academic Boot Camp “One teacher remarked that she hated September, because during the first month, ‘everything has to be done rigidly, and repeatedly, until they know exactly what they’re supposed to do.’ However ‘by January’, she said, ‘they know exactly what to do [during the day] and I don’t have to be after them all the time.’”

  6. Kindergarten as Academic Boot Camp Gracey concludes: “Once out of the school system, young adults will more than likely find themselves working in large-scale bureaucratic organizations, perhaps on the assembly line in the factory, perhaps in the paper routines of the white collar occupations, where they will be required to submit to rigid routines imposed by “the company” which may make little sense to them…

  7. Kindergarten as Academic Boot Camp “…Those who can operate well in this situation will be successful bureaucratic functionaries. Kindergarten, therefore, can be seen as preparing children not only for the participation in the bureaucratic organization of large school systems, but also for the large-scale occupational bureaucracies of modern societies.”

  8. What is Cultural Capital? Cultural capital is commonly defined as high-status cultural signals, such as attitudes, behaviours, preferences and credentials that are useful for distinguishing higher status from lower status individuals (Bourdieu 1977, DiMaggio 1982, Lamont and Lareau 1099, Eitle and Eitle 2002).

  9. Effect of “cultural capital” Kids in the U.S. that took classes in music, art, performance (dance), art history & appreciation, and music history & appreciation were: 3.2 times more likely to finish high school; 1.8 times more likely to begin university; and 1.4 times more likely to finish university compared to kids that did not take these classes (Aschaffenburg and Maas 1997).

  10. Illiteracy in Global Perspective

  11. Educational Attainment in Canada: Population 15 and over

  12. Population 15 years and Older with University Degree, 1996

  13. Postsecondary participation rates for Canadians aged 18-21 and no longer in high school by household income,1998

  14. Postsecondary participation rates for Canadians aged 18-21 and no longer in high school by parents’ education 1998

  15. Postsecondary participation rates for Canadians aged 18-21 and no longer in high school, by household income and parents’ education, 1998

  16. Predicted Probability of University Participation by Distance to University, Canada1999

  17. Predicted Probability of University Participation by Income Tier and Distance to School, Canada1999

  18. Canadian Parents’ Postsecondary Aspirations for Children and Saving Behaviour by Household Income, 1999

  19. Increase in university undergraduates, aged 25 to 64, by top ten fields of study, 1991-2001 Field of studyPercent Business and commerce 12.4 Engineering 10.7 Elem, second, pre-primary teaching 9.9 Financial management 5.8 Computer science/applied math 5.2 Psychology 3.8 Economics 2.9 Nursing 2.8 Medical related subjects 2.6 Sociology 2.6

  20. Unemployment Rate by Education Level, 2001

More Related