1 / 19

Factors influencing bully-victim behaviour with special focus on self-esteem and depression

Factors influencing bully-victim behaviour with special focus on self-esteem and depression. Dóra Várnai M.A., Ágnes Németh PhD., Ágnes Balogh, M.A., Gyöngyi Kökönyei, M.A., Gabriella Pál, M.D., Anna Aszmann, M.D. varnai@ogyei.hu. National Institute of Child Health.

yorick
Download Presentation

Factors influencing bully-victim behaviour with special focus on self-esteem and depression

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Factors influencing bully-victim behaviour with special focus on self-esteem and depression Dóra Várnai M.A., Ágnes Németh PhD., Ágnes Balogh, M.A., Gyöngyi Kökönyei, M.A., Gabriella Pál, M.D., Anna Aszmann, M.D. varnai@ogyei.hu National Institute of Child Health

  2. Bullying and nonbullying victims • Nonbullying victims - who seldom attempt to dominate others through aggressive behavior, they are often unassertive youngsters withdrawing from or concede to bullies and readily display emotional distress when bullied (Olweus, 1991) • Bullying victims - (sometimes described as provocative victims), who frequently aggress towards peers despite being bullied themselves, • engage in numerous aggressive acts towards peers • often show levels of aggression and aggression-related cognitive profiles comparable to bullies who are not themselves frequent targets of aggression (Vernberg et al., 1999) National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  3. Bullying – the frequencies in the Hungarian sample • The recent Hungarian sample (2002/2003) was used for the analysis • Statistical analysis included descriptive statistics, T-test, logistic regression, non parametric tests N=3838 N=655 N=899 N=559 National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  4. Age groups and bullying • The mean age is significantly lower in the bully-victim group, than in any of other three groups

  5. Gender differences • There are significant gender differences between groups indicating that the proportion of bully-victims and bullies among boys is significantly higher than among girls (chi square=146,497) National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  6. Family affluence and bullying • No significant difference was found between groups in their families’ wealth (FAS), or SES of father • Victims’ and bully victim’s mother’ SES is significantly lower than in any other group National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  7. Obesity • The ratio of obese children among bully victims is significantly higher than among controls (chi-square=17,561*), or bullies (chi square= 5,161*) but not significantly higher than among victims (chi square= 0,939) National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  8. Height short normal tall • We used height standards computed using age and self reported height (cm) • If we compare height category there are more short and normal and less tall children among bully victims than among controls (chi square=11,361*), or bullies (chi square=21,341*) • There are almost equal numbers of shorts, normals and talls among victims and bully victims (chi-square=4,711) National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  9. Bullying and self-esteem • Self – esteem was evaluated with Rosenberg self esteem items where higher scores indicate higher self-esteem, • It has been evaluated for 15-17 year olds • Self-esteem of bully-victims and victims is significantly lower than of controls or of bullies Dóra Várnai, 2004 N=2804 N=668 N=394 N=318

  10. Bullying and depression • Depression was evaluated with Child Depression Inventory items (Kovács, 1985) • Higher scores on scale indicate higher level of depression, that is significantly higher for victims or bully victims, than of bullies and controls N=2827 N=680 N=405 N=333 National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  11. Time out with friends • Bully-victims don’t spend less afternoons with friends than controls: it seems that their social network is not significantly poorer as that of the normal population • They spend more time out with friends than victims, • But significantly less time out than bullies National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  12. Attitude towards classmates • Higher scores indicate more preferable attitude towards classmates • There is significant difference between bully-victims and controls or bullies, indicating that bully victims judge class climate less advisable • There is no significant difference between victims and bully-victims in this point of view National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  13. Attitude towards teachers • Using this scale-like variable higher scores indicate better attitude towards teachers • Bully victims, just as bullies judge teachers significantly less fair and helpful than do controls and victims National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  14. Parental control • Higher scores indicate higher parental control • The paternal control is significantly lower for bully-victims and bullies than for controls or victims • The same is true for mother control, but in mother control there is no difference between victims and controls, whilst paternal control is higher for controls

  15. Parental love • There is significant difference of maternal and paternal love variable indicating that bullies and bully-victim report to have lower level of maternal affection than controls or victims • (There is significant difference between victims and controls as well on both variables)

  16. Logistic regression model • Logistic regression models were built (with the above mentioned variables as independent variables), but the multicollinearity proved to be too high in some cases– our future plan is to handle these variables together • Those who are obese have 1, 569 times higher chance to become bully-victims than to be controls and depressed children have 1,226 times higher chance to become bully-victim than to be control National Institute of Child Health

  17. Possible reasons • Victims’ aggression towards peers could be a reactive following episodes of being bullied • This suggests bully-victims may access physically aggressive responses quicker in potential confrontations with peers and in some instances fail to select appropriate alternatives to aggression during confrontation • Perhaps victims' intentions to aggress are generated by less adaptive coping with emotional arousal. • Negative body image is associated with bullying – they do not have more mature means from which to form masculine identity National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  18. Conclusion • Younger children, boys and obese children are at higher risk to be a bully victims • Bully victims are rather similar to victims and differ from bullies or controls in obesity, depression and lack of self-esteem, worse attitude towards classmates • Bully victims are rather similar to bullies in lower parental control, lower percepted affection for mother or father, worse attitude towards teachers • They do not differ from the other groups in height or in family affluence and they don’t spend less time out with friends than controls do • They really shape a mixed group sharing characteristic of both bullies and victims National Institute of Child Health Dóra Várnai, 2004

  19. Thank you! VARNAI@OGYEI.HU National Institute of Child Health

More Related