1 / 29

Speckle Noise Reduction in Optical Coherence Tomography

Speckle Noise Reduction in Optical Coherence Tomography. By: Marisse Foronda Rishi Matani Hardik Mehta Arthur Ortega. Cow Retina. tissue modulated wave fronts. multiple forward scatter. wave fronts. multiple back scatter. sample volume. Speckle. Background.

yuli-hooper
Download Presentation

Speckle Noise Reduction in Optical Coherence Tomography

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Speckle Noise Reduction in Optical Coherence Tomography By: Marisse Foronda Rishi Matani Hardik Mehta Arthur Ortega

  2. Cow Retina

  3. tissue modulated wave fronts multiple forward scatter wave fronts multiple back scatter sample volume Speckle

  4. Background • Minimally-Invasive to Non-Invasive imaging system • Clinically used • High Resolution alternate to ultrasound imaging • One significant problem is speckle formation

  5. Deformable Mirror

  6. Intensity Loss • Varying Patterns can cause loss of intensity of image and change in percent reflectivity • First, we must characterize default intensity loss by placing a flat mirror at the sample arm and having no deformations on the deformable mirror • Then, we deform mirror and characterize loss: • 3 dB loss  50% loss • 6 dB loss  75% loss • 9 dB loss  87.5% loss

  7. Pattern 1 100% 80% % light reflected Amplitude Pattern 2 100% 80% % light reflected Amplitude Image Assembly

  8. Contrast Ratio

  9. Correlation • If two images have speckle patterns that are the same, averaging them gives us no reduction in that speckle • We have to characterize how similar two images are using the formula:

  10. Gantt Chart

  11. Weekly Progress

  12. Prototype System

  13. Reverse Alignment

  14. 0 µW fiber and collimator deformable mirror 2D-galvo scanners 480 mW 526 mW fiber and collimator 2.5 mW 3.0 mW

  15. 1 µW fiber and collimator deformable mirror 2D-galvo scanners 480 mW 526 mW fiber and collimator 2.5 mW 3.0 mW

  16. 5 µW fiber and collimator deformable mirror 2D-galvo scanners 480 mW 526 mW fiber and collimator 2.5 mW 3.0 mW

  17. 10 µW fiber and collimator deformable mirror 2D-galvo scanners 480 mW 526 mW fiber and collimator 2.5 mW 3.0 mW

  18. 20 µW fiber and collimator deformable mirror 2D-galvo scanners 480 mW 526 mW fiber and collimator 2.5 mW 3.0 mW

  19. 35 µW fiber and collimator deformable mirror 2D-galvo scanners 480 mW 526 mW fiber and collimator 2.5 mW 3.0 mW

  20. 50 µW fiber and collimator deformable mirror 2D-galvo scanners 480 mW 526 mW fiber and collimator 2.5 mW 3.0 mW

  21. 80 µW fiber and collimator deformable mirror 2D-galvo scanners 480 mW 526 mW fiber and collimator 2.5 mW 3.0 mW

  22. 125 µW fiber and collimator output deformable mirror C2 2D-galvo scanners 480 mW G M 526 mW fiber and collimator 2.5 mW C1 input 3.0 mW

  23. Forward Alignment

  24. 3.0 mW fiber and collimator deformable mirror 2D-galvo scanners 2.2 mW 2.1 mW 486 mW fiber and collimator 10 µW

  25. 3.0 mW fiber and collimator deformable mirror 2D-galvo scanners 2.2 mW 2.1 mW fiber and collimator 486 mW 30 µW

  26. 3.0 mW fiber and collimator Input deformable mirror C1 2D-galvo scanners 2.2 mW G M 2.1 mW fiber and collimator 486 mW C2 Output 119 µW

  27. Power Results Forward Alignment Reverse Alignment -AR (anti-reflection) coating on Galvo mirrors (1310 nm) -Fibers (1310 nm) -Power Source (800 nm)

  28. Conclusion • Quantitative Benchmark: Reduce contrast ratio by 25% - 50% with a 6 dB mean intensity loss • Future Applications: Any Imaging system using a coherent light source can easily integrate the deformable mirror component. • Integration of the mirror will be efficient and cost effective.

  29. Questions

More Related