1 / 6

Process Capability Assessment

Process Capability Assessment. Devor , Chang, and Sutherland Chapter 10. Process Control vs. Process Capability. Process is “in-control” Only common cause variation in range Only common cause variation in mean

zavad
Download Presentation

Process Capability Assessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Process Capability Assessment Devor, Chang, and Sutherland Chapter 10 Dr. Joan Burtner, Assoc. Prof. of Industrial Engineering

  2. Process Control vs. Process Capability • Process is “in-control” • Only common cause variation in range • Only common cause variation in mean • No violations of “tests for control chart interpretation” listed in front cover of text • Process capability • Is process capable of meeting tolerances? • Does the process conform to specifications? • Potential problems • The process is off-center from the nominal. • The process variability is too large relative to the tolerances. • The process is off-center and has large variation. Dr. Joan Burtner, Assoc. Prof. of Industrial Engineering

  3. Process Capability • Process Capability Analysis is appropriately conducted only on processes that have been shown to be “in-control” • Two standard measures • Cp • Compares variability of process to specifications • Cpk • Compares variability of process to specifications • Considers the question: “Is the process sufficiently centered?” Dr. Joan Burtner, Assoc. Prof. of Industrial Engineering

  4. Process Capability Calculations • Calculations • Estimated values Dr. Joan Burtner, Assoc. Prof. of Industrial Engineering

  5. Process Capability Evaluation • Guidelines for Evaluation of Cp • Cp < 1.00 Not Capable • Guidelines for Evaluation of Cp • Cpk > 1.33 Definitely Capable • 1.00 < Cpk < 1.33 Possibly Capable • Cpk < 1.00 Not Capable Dr. Joan Burtner, Assoc. Prof. of Industrial Engineering

  6. Loss Function Evaluation • Loss function and its relation to quality is shown in Figure 10.10 • The Quadratic Loss Function is exhibited in Figure 10.11 • Calculations involve: • a loss coefficient (k) • the target (m) • the distance from the target (x) Dr. Joan Burtner, Assoc. Prof. of Industrial Engineering

More Related