1 / 31

Ascore Explained

Ascore Explained. Brian C. Searle Proteome Software Inc. Portland, Oregon USA Brian.Searle@ProteomeSoftware.com A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Beausoleil SA, Villén J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP.

zazu
Download Presentation

Ascore Explained

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Ascore Explained Brian C. Searle Proteome Software Inc. Portland, Oregon USA Brian.Searle@ProteomeSoftware.com A probability-based approach for high-throughput protein phosphorylation analysis and site localization. Beausoleil SA, Villén J, Gerber SA, Rush J, Gygi SP. Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Oct;24(10):1285-92. Creative Commons Attribution

  2. Search Engines

  3. Search Engines

  4. Structures of MAP kinase Unphosphorylated Form (inactive) Di-phosphorylated Form (active) B. J. Canagarajah et al., 1997, Cell90:859

  5. y1 – y5 b12 – b16

  6. ? X

  7. Ascore is interested in telling you just how LITTLE you know

  8. Ascore Outline • Build fragmentation model for each peptide • Normalize spectrum at 10 different peak depths • Determine the best peak depth • Calculate Ascore at that peak depth on only relevant peaks

  9. SIQDLTVTGTEPGQVSSR + p vs

  10. SpIQDLTVTGTEPGQVSSRSIQDLTpVTGTEPGQVSSRSIQDLTVTpGTEPGQVSSRSIQDLTVTGTpEPGQVSSRSIQDLTVTGTEPGQVSpSRSIQDLTVTGTEPGQVSSpRSpIQDLTVTGTEPGQVSSRSIQDLTpVTGTEPGQVSSRSIQDLTVTpGTEPGQVSSRSIQDLTVTGTpEPGQVSSRSIQDLTVTGTEPGQVSpSRSIQDLTVTGTEPGQVSSpR

  11. AscoreSpectrum Model • Only looks for B/Y ions • Either it’s there or it’s not

  12. Ascore Outline • Build fragmentation model for each peptide • Normalize spectrum at 10 different peak depths • Determine the best peak depth • Calculate Ascore at that peak depth on only relevant peaks

  13. Spectrum Peak Depth

  14. Spectrum Peak Depth

  15. Spectrum Peak Depth 1 peak per 100 m/z 4 peaks per 100 m/z 2 peaks per 100 m/z 5 peaks per 100 m/z 3 peaks per 100 m/z 6 peaks per 100 m/z

  16. Ascore Outline • Build fragmentation model for each peptide • Normalize spectrum at 10 different peak depths • Determine the best peak depth • Calculate Ascore at that peak depth on only relevant peaks

  17. Binomial Distribution Scorer • N = # of B/Y peaks in fragmentation model • n = # of matched peaks to actual spectrum • p = prior (e.g. 6 peaks per 100 m/z = 0.06) • Peptide Score = -10*log(P)

  18. Spectrum Peak Depth Peptide Score Number of Peaks per 100 m/z

  19. Spectrum Peak Depth Δ54.2 Peptide Score Number of Peaks per 100 m/z

  20. Ascore Outline • Build fragmentation model for each peptide • Normalize spectrum at 10 different peak depths • Determine the best peak depth • Calculate Ascore at that peak depth on only relevant peaks

  21. SpIQDLTVTGTEPGQVSSRSIQDLTpVTGTEPGQVSSR

  22. SpIQDLTVTGTEPGQVSSR Pep Score= 43.0 SIQDLTpVTGTEPGQVSSR Pep Score= 4.7 Final Ascore = Δ38.3

  23. Ascore Precision Beausoleil SA, et al Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Oct;24(10):1285-92.

  24. Ascore Precision Peptide Score Difference = +20 P-value Difference of 10-2 Best configuration is two orders of magnitude more likely

  25. Ascore Precision Beausoleil SA, et al Nat Biotechnol. 2006 Oct;24(10):1285-92.

  26. FELNDDYPSLPSMGWASpFELNDDYPSLPSpMGWAS

  27. FELNDDYPSLPSMGWASp Pep Score= 1.8 • FELNDDYPSLPSpMGWAS Pep Score= 0.4 Final Ascore = Δ1.4

  28. 32.0 25.6 7.2 0.3 Δ18.4

  29. Conclusions • Software like Ascore is critical for scientifically useful publication • MCP Philadelphia guidelines (Paris 2) require acknowledgement of ambiguity • It’s just as important to know what you don’t know

More Related