1 / 8

January 8, 2013 | NEPOOL markets committee

January 8, 2013 | NEPOOL markets committee. Jonathan Lowell. Principal analyst | market development. Tariff Clarification to Comply with June 20, 2013 FERC Order. Regulation Market (Order 755) Compliance. Background.

zizi
Download Presentation

January 8, 2013 | NEPOOL markets committee

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. January 8, 2013 | NEPOOL markets committee Jonathan Lowell Principal analyst | market development Tariff Clarification to Comply with June 20, 2013 FERC Order Regulation Market (Order 755) Compliance

  2. Background • FERC approved the February 6, 2013 regulation market design on June 20, 2013 • New rules ordered to become effective in 180 days • One additional compliance requirement to address “inter-temporal opportunity costs” • The Commission’s order stated: “…we will require ISO-NE to submit, within 45 days of the date of this order, a compliance filing that explains how regulation resources will be allowed to incorporate inter-temporal opportunity costs into their bids and how ISO-NE will verify these costs, and the associated modified tariff revisions.” • This requirement was not explicitly stated in the market rule language filed on February 6, 2013.

  3. What Are Inter-Temporal Opportunity Costs? • Storage resources may assess a different value to energy now versus energy later • Energy injections and withdrawals are inherently part of providing regulation service • Inter-temporal difference in LMPs represents an opportunity cost • May impact willingness to regulate now versus later • Order 755 allows inter-temporal opportunity costs (ITOC) to be included in the Regulation Capacity offer price. • The ITOC offer component reflects a Participant’s willingness to provide regulation based on the expectation of future LMP price differences.

  4. Does This Mean a Change to the Market Design? • No. The filed design only places two limits on what a participant can offer: • Offer floor price of $0/MW • Offer cap price of $100/MW • Participants already could include inter-temporal opportunity costs • The tariff compliance change will add a sentence to III.14.3(a)(v): “The Regulation Capacity Offer price must be greater than or equal to $0/MW and may not exceed $100/MW. A Market Participant may include estimated intertemporal opportunity costs in its Regulation Capacity Offer price.” • The market design will still work in exactly the same manner

  5. Proposed Implementation • eMarket interface will allow Regulation Capacity offer to be specified in two parts: • Inter-temporal opportunity cost component • Everything else • The two components will be added together to form a resource’s Regulation Capacity Offer price, and used for: • Resource selection • Regulation Capacity clearing price determination • Regulation make-whole payment calculation • The market design allows regulation offers to be updated at any time for any reason • Participants can easily reflect changing estimates of ITOC

  6. Verifying Inter-temporal Opportunity Costs • Order 755 requires ITOC to be verifiable • ISO Internal Market Monitor routinely reviews market performance, including performance of the Regulation Market • Existing Appendix A provisions provide IMM with authority to ask Participants to provide justification for market offers, including the ITOC component of a Regulation Capacity offer • See MR-1 Section III.A.17.1. Data Collection and Retention. • These information requests will provide the ISO with the means to verify ITOC offers, if and as needed

  7. Similar Approach Approved by FERC for CaISO • CaISO’s design includes a very similar concept • Participants submit their own estimates of ITOC • Participants “… have the burden to justify inter-temporal opportunity costs contained within a resource’s bid, upon request …” • Total regulation capacity bid, including ITOC must be no greater than the capacity bid cap

  8. Next Steps • MC vote at July 25, 2013 meeting • PC review at August 2, 2013 meeting • File with FERC by August 5, 2013 (45 days from compliance order)

More Related