1 / 35

SURA Members by State and Other Institutional Data

SURA Members by State and Other Institutional Data. Aug 13, 2003 Source: www.sura.org. SURA Region. Alabama - 5. Arkansas - 1. Delaware - 1. Florida - 8. Georgia - 5. Kentucky - 1. Louisiana - 5. Maryland - 1. Mississippi - 3. North Carolina - 5. Oklahoma - 1. South Carolina - 2.

zoe-stark
Download Presentation

SURA Members by State and Other Institutional Data

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. SURA Members by Stateand Other Institutional Data Aug 13, 2003 Source: www.sura.org

  2. SURA Region

  3. Alabama - 5

  4. Arkansas - 1

  5. Delaware - 1

  6. Florida - 8

  7. Georgia - 5

  8. Kentucky - 1

  9. Louisiana - 5

  10. Maryland - 1

  11. Mississippi - 3

  12. North Carolina - 5

  13. Oklahoma - 1

  14. South Carolina - 2

  15. Tennessee - 2

  16. Texas - 4

  17. Virginia - 12

  18. Washington, DC - 4

  19. West Virginia - 1

  20. Federal R&D Rankings (2001) • One measure of a research university’s “success” is annual federal R&D funding • The SURA region had 33 of the top 100 research universities & academic med ctrs, accounting for 29% of 2001 R&D • Only one, Johns Hopkins, is in the top 20

  21. Federal R&D Rankings (2001)

  22. Federal R&D Rankings (2001)

  23. Federal R&D Rankings (2001)

  24. Federal R&D Rankings (2001)

  25. Federal R&D Rankings (2001)

  26. Carnegie Classifications 2000 • In 2000, the Carnegie Foundation for the Advancement of Teaching restructured its well-known, if controversial, institutional classification system • DR Ext – “Doctoral/research universities-extensive” is a new category (with more institutions than the former “top” category, Research I) for institutions that confer 50 doctorates a year in at least 15 disciplines

  27. Carnegie Classifications (con’t) • 52 universities in the SURA region are classified as “DR Ext” • Note that independent health science centers have their own category • http://chronicle.com/stats/carnegie/

  28. Carnegie DR Ext in SURA Region

  29. Carnegie DR Ext in Region (2)

  30. Carnegie DR Ext in Region (3)

  31. Carnegie DR Ext in Region (4)

  32. Carnegie DR Ext in Region (5)

  33. Carnegie DR Ext in Region (6)

  34. Carnegie DR Ext in Region (7)

  35. Feedback welcome • Dan Updegrove • The University of Texas at Austin • (512) 331-5098 • d.updegrove@its.utexas.edu • Data compiled Aug 13, 2003

More Related