1 / 16

AHA! Academic Honesty Assistance

AHA! Academic Honesty Assistance. Lisa Callagher (AUBS Tamaki Division) Peter Smith (MER) Lynne Mitchell (BBIM Librarian). Agenda for today’s presentation. What is AHA! Why does UoA need an academic honesty tutorial? How is AHA! designed, delivered and assessed?

zoey
Download Presentation

AHA! Academic Honesty Assistance

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. AHA!Academic Honesty Assistance Lisa Callagher (AUBS Tamaki Division) Peter Smith (MER) Lynne Mitchell (BBIM Librarian)

  2. Agenda for today’s presentation • What is AHA! • Why does UoA need an academic honesty tutorial? • How is AHA! designed, delivered and assessed? • Results from the pilot study • Where should AHA! go?

  3. AHA! • Interactive self-paced tutorials and on-line assessments It’s purpose: • To introduce students to the role of university • To induct students into UoA’s academic environment, including our implicit expectations, policies, processes and practices • To provide practical research, noting-taking and referencing skills • To encourage academic honesty and reduce plagiarism

  4. Academic honesty as a higher education issue • Plagiarism is a significant issue in higher education (Hauptman, 2002.,Campbell, Owens Swift and Denton, 2000) • A number of factors are attributed to its ‘increase’ • Digital sources, electronic paper mills and the Internet (Born, 2003., Park, 2003) • Changing student demographic and economic reasons for participating in higher education (McCabe et al, 1992-1999)

  5. Academic honesty at UoA • Recent research (Mills, in progress) from UABS reports students awareness of and participation in plagiarism • Existing procedures to guard against cheating and plagiarism ( Guidelines: Conduct of Coursework) http://www2.auckland.ac.nz/teachingandlearning/Documents/Coursework%20Conduct%20Guidelines.pdf • Concerned with action not intent of the action • Policy that outlines process ‘after the event’

  6. Addressing plagiarism through learning and teaching • Academic honesty is socially constructed knowledge (Payne and Nantz,1994) • Students must experience institutional values in order to understand why they are different from other institutional and social settings (Hauptman, 2002)

  7. Design principles • Students engage themselves in the context and values that underpin academic honesty at UoA • Students learn in their own time, pace and space • Students transfer their understanding of academic honesty directly into other aspects of their academic life • This is achieved in a resource (people, time, $) sustainable model

  8. AHA! Delivering these principles Core modules • The Academic Environment • Academic Honesty • University of Auckland Policy • Including study strategies to avoid plagiarism Additional module • APA referencing style (currently available) • Accessed from Cecil, available 24/7 • Lo-speed option available • Interactive with pop ups, true/false questions, interviews, student-oriented ethical scenarios

  9. AHA! Assessment • Formative assessment embedded in modules • True/false questions • ‘To go.. for more information’ • Ethical questions to ponder • Summative assessment • Multi-choice quizzes at end of each module

  10. Results of pilot study in MGMT.101 • Traditionally referencing was taught in a one hour tutorial and supported by dept document on referencing • This semester 982 stage I students were required to complete 3+1 modules and gain at least 80% in each quiz prior to submitting a 20% essay

  11. Qualitative evidence • Number of student’s failing the assignment because of plagiarism (i.e. getting zero): • Without AHA 8.5% • With AHA 5.5% • That’s a difference of about 30 people • Quality of referencing and citation • “Much improved”, “significantly better”

  12. Quantitative evidence: Intra-Course

  13. To put it another way

  14. Quantitative evidence: Inter-Course

  15. Student perceptions “It should be made compulsory in every courses at the University of Auckland.” “make my reference more correct and fast” “I found it very helpful for preparing reference list for essay writing.”

  16. Where should AHA! go? • Our Vision: AHA! is actively used by all courses within the University of Auckland • Currently negotiating with library services to take over marketing and management of AHA! • Investment in product likely to be demand-driven • Discipline staff needed to adapt AHA! and implement in classes

More Related