1 / 25

Acquisition

Acquisition. Katie Valvo Associate Director, Acquisition The Nature Conservancy kvalvo@tnc.org. Audience Balance Balance High Value Audience Growth List Tiering Cooperative Data Creative Multivariate Testing Package to Audience High Value.

zubin
Download Presentation

Acquisition

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Acquisition Katie Valvo Associate Director, Acquisition The Nature Conservancy kvalvo@tnc.org

  2. Audience Balance • Balance High Value Audience Growth • List Tiering • Cooperative Data • Creative • Multivariate Testing • Package to Audience • High Value

  3. Mail Volume increased by 10% from FY07 to FY10

  4. Average Gift Falls Year-over-Year

  5. Recession begins in September 2008 (FY09) – average gift had already fallen against FY08 Average Gift

  6. Response falls then bounces back

  7. With the increase of QTY in FY08, response dropped by 10% and the Av Gift drops over $1 less than FY07

  8. Package Trends Did a change in the mix of packages used or a decline in performance in one package negatively impact FY09? Program has been very reactionary from heavy testing, economic conditions and package-driven performance months.

  9. Lists – Performance by Tiers Lists used in the previous fiscal year were ranked by net/donor, excluding the calendar mailing. For the following fiscal year: • Lists in the top 25% of net/donor are labeled Tier 1. • Lists in the next 35% of net/donor are labeled Tier 2. • Lists in the final 40% of net/donor are labeled Tier 3.

  10. There is a significant drop in the use of Tier 2 lists. We need to be diligent on list universe make-up.

  11. Another View: Tier 1 increases Yr Over Year, With Tier 2 Shrinking & Tier 3 increases – FY10 Appears to be on a Good Start

  12. 60% of universe on Test & Tier 3 Lists & highest Cost/Donor – directly affect the bottom-line

  13. Average Gift Softened Most with Tier 1 Lists

  14. Environmental Lists Impact All Tiers

  15. Impact FY11 - Present

  16. Creative

  17. Multivariate Test Design

  18. Five significant effects: A-: Control envelope is better (by 20.8%) with a cost of $29.85 / 1k for the new OE O-: With the drop in response, the upgraded asks have a negative impact on net revenue (hurt 15.0%) F-: Larger letter format hurts net revenue by 9.5% at a cost of $1.80 / 1k B-: Bubble-padded OE hurts net revenue 7.1% at a cost of $9.80 / 1k P+: Highlighting one ask increases revenue 6.2%

  19. Optimal Package

  20. Package to Audience Mix and High- Value

  21. Audience Balance • Balance High Value Audience Growth • List Tiering • Cooperative Data • Creative • Multivariate Testing • Package to Audience • High Value • THANK YOU!

More Related