1 / 37

Strongly correlated materials from Dynamical Mean Field Perspective.

Strongly correlated materials from Dynamical Mean Field Perspective. Thanks to: G.Kotliar, S. Savrasov, V. Oudovenko. DMFT(SUNCA method) two-band Hubbard model Bethe lattice, U=4D. Overview. Application of DMFT to real materials (LDA+DMFT)

enye
Download Presentation

Strongly correlated materials from Dynamical Mean Field Perspective.

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Strongly correlated materials from Dynamical Mean Field Perspective. Thanks to:G.Kotliar, S. Savrasov, V. Oudovenko DMFT(SUNCA method) two-band Hubbard model Bethe lattice, U=4D

  2. Overview • Application of DMFT to real materials (LDA+DMFT) • Extensions of DMFT to clusters and its application to models for high-Tc

  3. mapping fermionic bath Dynamical Mean Field Theory Basic idea of DMFT: reduce the quantum many body problem to a one site or a cluster of sites, in a medium of non interacting electrons obeying a self consistency condition. Basic idea of Spectral density functional approach: instead of using functionals of the density, use more sensitive functionals of the one electron spectral function. [density of states for adding or removing particles in a solid, measured in photoemission]

  4. Coherence incoherence crossover in a model Phase diagram of a Hubbard model with partial frustration at integer filling.  M. Rozenberg et.al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 75, 105-108 (1995). .

  5. mapping fermionic bath DFT and DMFT Density functional theory observable of interest is the electron density Dynamical mean field theory: observable of interest is the local Green's function (on the lattice uniquely defined) DMFT approximation exact BK functional

  6. Spectral density functional theory: use local Green's function (spectral function) instead of local density Spectral density functional theory observable of interest is the "local" Green's functions LDA+DMFT: basic idea: sum-up all local diagrams for electrons in correlated orbitals LDA+U corresponds to LDA+DMFT when impurity is solved in the Hartree Fock approximation

  7. * LDA local in localized LMTO base DMFT SCC * Impurity solver Impurity problem (14x14): LDA+DMFT Calculation

  8. weakly correlated strongly correlated metal Mott isolator LDA bandwidth Coulomb interaction

  9. f7 L=0,S=7/2 J=7/2 f5 L=5,S=5/2 J=5/2 f1 L=3,S=1/2 J=5/2 f6 L=3,S=3 J=0 Overview

  10. Cerium

  11. Ce overview  isostructural phase transition ends in a critical point at (T=600K, P=2GPa)  (fcc) phase [ magnetic moment (Curie-Wiess law), large volume, stable high-T, low-p]   (fcc) phase [ loss of magnetic moment (Pauli-para), smaller volume, stable low-T, high-p] with large volume collapse v/v  15 • Transition is 1.order • ends with CP very similar to gas-liquid condesation of water

  12. LDA and LDA+U ferromagnetic f DOS total DOS

  13. LDA+DMFT alpha DOS TK(exp)=1000-2000K

  14. LDA+DMFT gamma DOS TK(exp)=60-80K

  15. Photoemission&experiment Kondo volume colapse (J.W. Allen, R.M. Martin, 1982): Fenomenological Landau approach:

  16. Optical conductivity + * + K. Haule, V. Oudovenko, S. Y. Savrasov, and G. KotliarPhys. Rev. Lett. 94, 036401 (2005) *

  17. Americium

  18. Americium Mott Transition? "soft" phase "hard" phase A.Lindbaum*, S. Heathman, K. Litfin, and Y. Méresse, Phys. Rev. B 63, 214101 (2001) J.-C. Griveau, J. Rebizant, G. H. Lander, andG.KotliarPhys. Rev. Lett. 94, 097002 (2005)

  19. Am within LDA+DMFT S. Y. Savrasov, K. Haule, and G. KotliarPhys. Rev. Lett. 96, 036404 (2006)

  20. Am within LDA+DMFT very different "soft" localized phase from g Ce not in local moment regime since J=0 (no entropy) Comparisson with experiment nf=6 nf=6.2 * *J. R. Naegele, L. Manes, J. C. Spirlet, and W. MüllerPhys. Rev. Lett. 52, 1834-1837 (1984) "Hard" phase similar to a Ce, Kondo physics due to hybridization, however, nf still far from Kondo regime Different from Sm! from J=0 to J=7/2

  21. high Tc's

  22. Models of high Tc's cluster in real space cluster in k space

  23. Coherence scale and Tc

  24. optics

  25. power laws Nature 425, 271-274 (2003)

  26. optics mass and plasma w Basov, cond-mat/0509307

  27. SC density of states

  28. Kinetic and Exchange energy cond-mat/0503073

  29. 41meV resonance

  30. pseudoparticle insights

  31. Conclusions • In many correlated f metals, single site LDA+DMFT gives the zeroth order picture • 2D models of high-Tc require cluster of sites. Optimally doped regime can be well described with smallest cluster 2x2.

  32. Partial DOS 4f Z=0.33 5d 6s

  33. More complicated f systems • Hunds coupling is important when more than one electron in the correlated (f) orbital • Spin orbit coupling is very small in Ce, while it become important in heavier elements The complicated atom embedded into fermionic bath (with crystal fileds) is a serious chalange so solve! Coulomb interaction is diagonal in the base of total LSJ -> LS base while the SO coupling is diagonal in the j-base -> jj base Eigenbase of the atom depends on the strength of the Hund's couling and strength of the spin-orbit interaction

  34. Classical theories Mott transition (B. Johansson, 1974): Hubbard model f electrons insulating changes and causes Mott tr. spd electrons pure spectators Anderson (impurity) model Kondo volume colapse (J.W. Allen, R.M. Martin, 1982): hybridization with spd electrons is crucial (Lavagna, Lacroix and Cyrot, 1982) changes → chnange of TK bath f electrons in local moment regime either constant or taken from LDA and rescaled Fenomenological Landau approach:

  35. ab initio calculation LDA+DMFT is self-consistently determined bath for AIM contains tff and Vfd hopping • Kondo volume colapse model resembles DMFT picture: • Solution of the Anderson impurity model→ Kondo physics • Difference: with DMFT the lattice problem is solved (and therefore Δ must self-consistently determined)while in KVC Δ is calculated for a fictious impurity (and needs to be rescaled to fit exp.) • In KVC scheme there is no feedback on spd bans, hence optics is not much affected.

  36. An example Atomic physics of selected Actinides

More Related