1 / 29

Assessment, Compliance, and Institutional Effectiveness: Tennessee State University’s Model

Assessment, Compliance, and Institutional Effectiveness: Tennessee State University’s Model. G. Pamela Burch-Sims, Ph.D. and Peck-Chong Liew, Ed.D . Tennessee State University. Goals. Issues related to accreditation

lee
Download Presentation

Assessment, Compliance, and Institutional Effectiveness: Tennessee State University’s Model

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Assessment, Compliance, and Institutional Effectiveness:Tennessee State University’s Model G. Pamela Burch-Sims, Ph.D. and Peck-Chong Liew, Ed.D. Tennessee State University

  2. Goals • Issues related to accreditation • Defining expected outcomes based on mission, vision, and core values of the institution • Implementing and documenting the process for assessing expected outcomes that demonstrative evidence of student learning and institutional effectiveness

  3. Overview • Implementation of Tennessee State University’s collaborative planning and assessment model • Integration of Title III programmatic management and funding into the university’s planning cycle • Utilization of a uniform six-step assessment and improvement process • Utilization of a university-wide online system for monitoring and reporting assessment and improvement relating to the university’s mission and strategic plan • Guided Interactive Activity

  4. Interrelationship Among TnState Plans Complete College Tennessee Act 2010 Tennessee Higher Education Commission (THEC) Tennessee Board of Regents (TBR) Mission Scholarly Inquiry • Research •Lifelong Learning •Service TSU Academic Master Plan TSU Strategic Plan Title III Comprehensive Development Plan University Assessment and Improvement Plan

  5. Interrelationship between Institutional Effectiveness and the Title III Comprehensive Development Plan SACSCOC CR 2.5 CS 3.3.1 TSU Academic Master Plan THEC Performance Funding Goals TBR Strategic Plan Mission Scholarly Inquiry  Research  Lifelong Learning Service • TSU Strategic Plan 2015 • Access and Diversity • Academic Quality and Student Success • Business Friendly Practices • Revenue Generation/Research/Resourcefulness • Engagement KPIs University Assessment and Improvement Plan

  6. Administrative Arrangement and Infrastructure • Prior to the establishment of the Office of Institutional Planning and Assessment (IPA ) office in 2010, structural challenges had hampered comprehensive assessment and planning efforts at the institution • Implementation and maintenance responsibilities for planning and assessment are carried out through the University Strategic Planning Council (USPC) and the University Assessment and Improvement Council (UAIC) • A uniform six-step assessment and improvement process is in place at the university, requiring campus units to align their strategic plans to the University Strategic Plan 5 Key Performance Indicators (KPIs)

  7. Title III focus on TSU|2015 Key Performance Indicators • KPI 1: Access and Diversity • Activity 1: Strengthening Institutional Management and Infrastructural Support • KPI 2: Academic Quality and Student Success • Activity 2: Enhancing Student Success Consortium • Activity 3: Academic Collaborative: Enhancing Undergraduate Education through Innovative Technologies • Activity 4: Strengthening the Capacity to Improve Academic Quality • KPI 3: Business-Friendly Practices • KPI 4: Revenue Generation/ Research/ Resourcefulness • Activity 1: Strengthening Institutional Management and Infrastructural Support

  8. Activity 1: Strengthening Institutional Management and Infrastructural Support • Three interrelated undertakings comprise this activity: • Program Administration • Endowment • Construction

  9. Activity 2: Enhancing Student Success Consortium • Six major multi-disciplinary, intra-divisional units collaborated to construct this Initiative

  10. Activity 3: Academic Collaborative: Enhancing Undergraduate Education through Innovative Technologies • Enhancing undergraduate education through innovative technologies describes five innovative, technology-intensive components.

  11. Activity 4: Strengthening the Capacity to Improve Academic Quality This activity encompasses five major areas • QEP • Planning and Assessment • Service Learning & Civic Engagement • Faculty Support • Library

  12. Uniform Assessment Process

  13. Uniform Assessment Process

  14. Uniform Assessment Process

  15. Uniform Assessment Process

  16. Uniform Assessment Process

  17. Uniform Assessment Process

  18. Uniform Assessment Process

  19. Online Reporting System

  20. Online Reporting System

  21. Online Reporting System

  22. Online Reporting System

  23. Online Reporting System

  24. Online Reporting System

  25. Title III Progress Reporting

  26. Title III Progress Reporting

  27. Hands-On Activity • A Guided Interactive Group Activity

  28. Q & A

  29. Contact Information Dr. G. Pamela Burch-Sims, Director Title III/ Institutional Effectiveness & Research/ Accreditation Liaison 615.963.7043 psims@tnstate.edu Dr. Peck-Chong Liew, Research Analyst/Program Evaluation Title III Program Administration 615.963.7050 pliew@tnstate.edu Tennessee State University 3500 John A Merritt Blvd Nashville, Tennessee 37209 615.963.5661

More Related