1 / 11

Educational Approval Board Approved Schools Conference EAB Effectiveness Survey Results

Educational Approval Board Approved Schools Conference EAB Effectiveness Survey Results. David C. Dies, EAB Executive Secretary November 9, 2006. Session Overview. Survey Purpose Response Summary Category Analysis. Survey Purpose. EAB is Promoting Effective Schools Model

osma
Download Presentation

Educational Approval Board Approved Schools Conference EAB Effectiveness Survey Results

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Educational Approval BoardApproved Schools ConferenceEAB Effectiveness Survey Results David C. Dies, EAB Executive Secretary November 9, 2006

  2. Session Overview • Survey Purpose • Response Summary • Category Analysis

  3. Survey Purpose • EAB is Promoting Effective Schools Model • Survey Reflects EAB Leading by Example • Need for Schools to Collect Outcome Data • Focus on Employed / Student Satisfaction • Advisory Groups / Graduate Follow-up Needs • Demonstrate One Type of Survey Instrument

  4. Response Summary • Sample Size • Electronic Only • 200 Invites (25 General Emails) • Completion Rate • 120 Visits • 83 Completes (~50% completion rate) • 8 Partials • Reopen Survey?

  5. Category Analysis • General/Classification • Policy & Governance • Staff Relations • Approval Process • Communications

  6. Category Analysis • General/Classification • Respondents • Relatively equal school official representation. • Length of Approval • 30% <5, 30% 5-10, 25% 10-20, 14% > 20 • Wisconsin Location • ¾ of respondents had a physical location. • School Type • 28% degree-granting • 56% non degree-granting • 16% both

  7. Category Analysis • Policy & Governance • Modernization Awareness • ¾ of respondents had awareness • 53 comments (36 support, 4 oppose, 23 neutral) • Outcomes Emphasis • Virtually all respondents indicated awareness • Support for Outcomes • ¾ of respondents expressed support • 36 comments (reasonable / verification) • EAB & School Collaboration

  8. Category Analysis • Staff Relations • 96% of school officials report they know EAB staff. • Nearly all schools officials have interacted with EAB staff in past year. • 95% of school officials rated this interaction as excellent/good. • Schools indicate they are comfortable seeking advice. • ¼ of schools have never been visited. • Respondents report productive site visits. • School Visit Comments

  9. Category Analysis • Approval Process • School and Program Approval Guide • Expectations • Understandable • Construction • Annual Renewal Process • Clarity of instructions • Staff Helpfulness • Time to complete process • Electronic Renewal • Suggestions for Improvement

  10. Category Analysis • Communications • ¾ of respondents receive newsletter. • Popular Features • Administrative Actions / School News / Staff News • EAB Website • Access to Forms / Statutes & Rules • Conference / Regional Meetings • ¾ of respondents have attended at least 1 conference / regional meetings.

  11. Questions

More Related