1 / 7

Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP

Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP. Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC). Summary. Many meetings after the last CJK meeting (next slide). H.IRP sailed smoothly. H.IDscheme ran into many procedural and content issues, and still under serious discussion. List of meetings.

trevet
Download Presentation

Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Status of Collaborative Team work on H.IDscheme, H.ID-RA and H.IRP Chiaki Ishikawa (TTC)

  2. Summary • Many meetings after the last CJK meeting (next slide). • H.IRP sailed smoothly. • H.IDscheme ran into many procedural and content issues, and still under serious discussion.

  3. List of meetings • Fall of 2010: ITU-T JCA-NID unofficial ad-hoc meetings of experts. • Nov 24-26, 2010: The last CJK NID/USN meeting in Tokyo. • Nov 29-Dec 4, 2010: ITU-T SG16 WP2 Rapporteur meeting. • March 14-25, 2011: ITU-T SG16 Q21,Q22 • April 19, 20: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 meeting in Stockholm. • May 9-13, 2011: The last Q21/Q22 session at GSI-IoT meeting in Geneva • June 20, 21: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 29174-1 and 29174-2 DoC Meeting • May 22: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31 plenary in Vienna • June 26, 30, July 5 : Ad-hoc committee organized by chair of SC31 • July 11th: Continuation ofJune 20’s 29174-1 and 29174-2 DoC Meeting.

  4. Fall of 2010: ITU-T JCA-NID unofficial ad-hoc meetings of experts. • Nov 24-26, 2010: The last CJK NID/USN meeting in Tokyo. • Nov 29-Dec 4, 2010: ITU-T SG16 WP2 Rapporteur meeting. • On Nov 29th afternoon, the ad-hoc meeting of experts organized by ITU-T JCA-NID recommended that the proposals from ITU-T SG16 (H.IDscheme) and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC 31/WG 6 (MII) be merged. • So the merged idea was discussed there with ITU-T SG16 editors and ISO Project editor and draft was created and submitted to SG16 and brought back to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6. • Basically, H.IRP | 29177 was agreed upon to be common standard without much difficulty.

  5. March 14-25, 2011: ITU-T SG16 Q21,Q22 • The final (very little edited) ToR for Collaborative team work was approved, and ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 was asked to approve that. • April 19, 20: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 meeting in Stockholm. • ToR was approved and the SC31 was asked to approve it. • May 9-13, 2011: The last Q21/Q22 session at GSI-IoT meeting in Geneva • H.ID-RA | 29174-2 being discussed. • COMMON format documents were tentatively proposed for trial (after a straw poll) for H.IDScheme | 29174-1 and H.ID-RA | 29174-2 and so were created and sent from ITU-T SG16 to ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6. • Again, H.IRP | 29177 had not much difficulty.

  6. May 22: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31 plenary in Vienna • ToR was finally approved. It is official. • This meetingraised “scope issues” within ISO/IEC JTC 1/SC 31. WG6 has a rather narrow scope and cannot create standard that “identify” physical objects. An ad-hoc meeting was proposed to resolve this issue and to create a recommendation. • June 20: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 29174-1 and 29174-2 DoC Meeting • The scope issues and a few issues were raised. The scope issues needed to wait for the ad-hoc meeting report (by July 11th, the continuation meeting.) • June 21: ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31/WG6 29177 (H.IRP) • Again, this document sailed smoothly.

  7. June 26, 30, July 5 : Ad-hoc committee organized by chair of SC31 • The scope issues are caused due to the division of target areas assumed by WGs of ISO/IEC JTC1/SC31. • ITU-T finds it difficult to handle this division of area because it affects the wording, definition and other aspects of the draft Recommendation and International Standard in a somewhat contorted manner. • The chair is expected to submit a summary to SC31 and to WG6. • WG6 Project Editor of 29174-1 and 29174-2 can decide how to cope with the suggestion. • July 11th: Continuation ofJune 20’s 29174-1 and 29174-2 DoC Meeting. • CJK participants (on ITU-SG16 WP2) will find out how the SC31 ad-hoc affects the draft of 29174-1.

More Related