1 / 10

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS & ANALYSIS

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS & ANALYSIS. (UNIT-I). ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS. A successful accident investigation determine what happened that leads to discovering how and why an accident occurred. Why? discovering and analyzing causal factors.

Pat_Xavi
Download Presentation

ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS & ANALYSIS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS & ANALYSIS (UNIT-I)

  2. ACCIDENT INVESTIGATIONS • A successful accident investigation determine what happened that leads to discovering how and why an accident occurred. • Why? • discovering and analyzing causal factors. • organizational improvement as the key objective. • focuses on determining some level of fault. • Organizational benefit? • Seek to understand the event to prevent similar occurrences. • Initial investigation - responsible supervisor • Organizations Support • must work to reduce the time between the reporting of a serious accident and the start of the investigation. • Provide investigators with all the necessary tools and equipment to conduct a thorough investigation.

  3. Accident causal factors • Identifying and understanding causal factors must include a strong focus on how human behaviors contributed to the accident. • Organizations must conduct comprehensive investigations when preliminary information reveals inconsistencies with written policies and procedures. • CF Vary in terms of importance because applying a value to them remains a very difficult challenge. • Overvaluecausal factors immediately documented after the accident. These reveal details about the situation at the time of occurrence. • Devalue less obvious causes that remained removed by time and location from the accident scene. • Using sound investigational techniques -help determine all major causal factors. • Investigator Support • seek to find out what, when, where, who, how, and most of all why. • seek to identify any failures of organizational-related management systems that contribute directly or indirectly to many accident events.

  4. How to do? • Before attempting to discover and document causal factors, examine the site and take steps to preserve any important evidence. • Attempt to identify and document a list of witnesses. • Apply, a particular physical or chemical law, an engineering principle, or equipment operation may explain a sequence of events. • Investigators use diagrams, sketches, and measurements to support their understanding of what happened. This can also assist in future analysis. • Consider using video recorders or cameras when conducting investigations. • Use charts or sequence diagrams to help develop a probable sequence of events. • Attempt to look beyond the obvious to uncover direct and indirect causal factors. • Evaluate all known human, situational, and environmental factors. Research studies indicate that most workplace accident investigations reveal 10 or more causal factors. • Determine what broken equipment need removal from the scene for further analysis. Investigators should develop written notes about items removed from the scene including their positions at the accident scene. • Interview as many witnesses as possible before leaving the scene. These witnesses can serve as primary sources of information in many investigations. • Accident scene tampering and evidence removal prior to the investigator arriving would make witnesses very important.

  5. Classifying Causal Factors • Understand the importance of classifying causal factors in one of the following three categories. • Relates to operational factors • such as unsafe job processes, inadequate task supervision, lack of job training, and work area hazards. • Relates to human motivational factors • including risky behaviors, job-related stress, poor attitudes, drug use, and horseplay. • Relates to organizational factors • including inadequate hazard control policies and procedures, management deficiencies, poor organizational structure, or lack of senior leadership.

  6. Unsafe materials, tools, and equipment • • Ineffective machine guarding • • Defective materials and tools • • Improper or poor equipment design • • Using wrong tool or using tool improperly • • Poor preventive maintenance procedures • Unsafe conditions • • Poor lighting or ventilation • • Crowded or poorly planned work areas • • Poor storage, piling, and housekeeping practices • • Lack of exit and egress routes • • Poor environmental conditions such as slippery floors Common Causal Factors Poor supervision • Lack of proper instructions • Job and/or safety rules not enforced • Inadequate PPE, incorrect tools, and improper equipment • Poor planning, improper job procedures, and rushing the worker Worker job practices • Use of shortcuts and/or working too fast • Incorrect use or failure to use protective equipment • Horseplay or disregard of established safety rules • Physical or mental impairment on the job • Using improper body motion or technique

  7. Interviewing Witnesses • Interview witnesses individually and never in a group setting. • If possible, interview a witness at the scene of the accident. It also preferable to carry out interviews in a quiet location. • Seek to establish a rapport with the witness and document information using their words to describe the event. • Put the witness at ease and emphasize the reason for the investigation. • Let the witness talk and listen carefully and validate all statements. Record the interview. • Never intimidate, interrupt, or prompt the witness. • Use probing questions that require witnesses to provide detailed answers. • Never use leading questions. • Ensure that logic and not emotion directs the interview process. • Always close the interview on a positive note.

  8. ACCIDENT ANALYSIS • Hazard evaluations and accident trend analysis help improve the effectiveness of established hazard controls. • Routine analysis - develop and implement appropriate controls in work procedures, hazardous processes, and unsafe operations. • Analyze to determine how and why an accident occurred. Use findings to develop and implement the appropriate controls. • Don’t overlook information sources such as technical data sheets, hazard control committee minutes, inspection reports etc. • When using accident investigation evidence, information can exist in a physical or documentary form & come from eyewitness accounts. The analysis must evaluate sequence of events, extent of damage, human injuries, surface causal factors, hazardous chemical agents, sources of energy, and unsafe behaviors. • A good accident analysis should create a complete accident picture of the entire event. • The final analysis report should include detailed recommendations for controlling hazards discovered during the investigation and analysis.

  9. Root Cause Analysis • RCA processes can help connect the dots of accident causation by painting a picture that includes beneath the surface causes. • A root cause process must involve teams using systematic and systemic methods. • It focus on the identification of problems and causal factors that triggered the unwanted event not placing blame. • When analyzing a problem, understand what happened before discovering why it happened. • Don’t overlook causal factors related to procedures, training, quality processes, communications, safety, supervision, and management systems.

  10. Continued… • An effective RCA process lays a foundation for designing and implementing appropriate hazard controls. • For simplicity reasons, system-related root causes fall into two major classifications. The first class concerns design flaws such as inadequate or missing policies, plans, processes, or procedures that impact conditions and behaviors. • The other category, known as operational weaknesses, refer to failures related to implementing or carrying out established policies, plans, processes, or procedures. • When discovered and validated, specific root causes can provide insight to an entire process or system. • The process can also help identify what fed the problem that impacted the system. • Finally, RCA provides insight for developing solutions or changes that will improve the organization.

More Related