50 likes | 177 Views
COM 440 Week 1 Individual Assignment Communication Law Worksheet COM 440 Week 2 Individual Assignment Freedom of Expression & Sedition Paper COM 440 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Final Learning Team Formal Outline & References COM 440 Week 3 Individual Assignment Invasion of Privacy and Libel Case Study COM 440 Week 4 Individual Assignment Confidentiality of Sources Paper COM 440 Week 5 Learning Team Assignments Final Learning Team Paper COM 440 Week 5 Individual Assignment Explicit Communication or Fair Trial Paper
E N D
COM 440 UOP Courses For more course tutorials visit www.uoptutorial.com Get Ready to grant success at exam by shop at uoptutorial
COM 440 UOP Courses COM 440 ENTIRE COURSE COM 440 WEEK 1 INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT COMMUNICATION LAW WORKSHEET Prepare a 1,700- to 2,100-word paper in which you identify and discusses three separate events or legal developments involving the treatment of sedition in the American judicial system. One of legal event chosen must include the facts and decision in the Gitlow v. New York case. See Ch. 2 in Mass Media Law. • Describe how these three events or developments affected the limits of freedom of expression under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution. • Research at least 2 peer-reviewed outside sources in addition to your text for this paper. • COM 440 Week 1 Individual Assignment Communication Law Worksheet • COM 440 Week 2 Individual Assignment Freedom of Expression & Sedition Paper • COM 440 Week 3 Learning Team Assignment Final Learning Team Formal Outline & References • COM 440 Week 3 Individual Assignment Invasion of Privacy and Libel Case Study • COM 440 Week 4 Individual Assignment Confidentiality of Sources Paper
COM 440 UOP Courses COM 440 WEEK 2 INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT FREEDOM OF EXPRESSION & SEDITION PAPER COM 440 WEEK 3 INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT INVASION OF PRIVACY AND LIBEL CASE STUDY Prepare a 1,400- to 1,700-word response to the questions that follow this case study. Steve recently joined a church. Church doctrine required that members reveal any personal indiscretions to the leaders of the church. Steve disclosed some of his personal indiscretions to the leaders of the church. After his disclosures, these leaders advised Steve that they intended to tell other members of the church about his indiscretions because they thought that the church leaders might help him overcome his problems • Prepare a 1,700- to 2,100-word paper in which you identify and discusses three separate events or legal developments involving the treatment of sedition in the American judicial system. One of legal event chosen must include the facts and decision in the Gitlow v. New York case. See Ch. 2 in Mass Media Law. • • Describe how these three events or developments affected the limits of freedom of expression under the First Amendment to the U.S. Constitution.
COM 440 UOP Courses COM 440 WEEK 3 LEARNING TEAM ASSIGNMENT FINAL LEARNING TEAM FORMAL OUTLINE & REFERENCES COM 440 WEEK 4 INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT CONFIDENTIALITY OF SOURCES PAPER • Resources: Mass Media Law • Prepare a 1,400 to 1,700-word three-part research paper. Address the specifics within your paper of each of the following questions below as they pertain to Branzburg v. Hayes, Confidentiality, and Shield Laws. o Branzburg v. Hayes (Ch. 9) • What did the court hold in Branzburg regarding a journalist’s right to withhold confidential sources? • Resources: Final Learning Team Paper • • Complete the Final Learning Team Outline & References
COM 440 UOP Courses COM 440 WEEK 5 INDIVIDUAL ASSIGNMENT EXPLICIT COMMUNICATION OR FAIR TRIAL PAPER COM 440 WEEK 5 LEARNING TEAM ASSIGNMENTS FINAL LEARNING TEAM PAPER COM 440 Week 5 Learning Team Assignments Final Learning Team Paper • • Prepare a 1,050 to 1,400-word paper on either sexually explicit communication or fair trial. • o Sexually Explicit Communication Paper • Critique the regulation of current obscenity laws. Use both your text and outside research. Address the following questions within your paper: • • Describe the Miller Test. What are community standards? Are community standards an appropriate way to determine obscenity?