1 / 31

LIDAR vs Photogrammetry?

LIDAR vs Photogrammetry?. Lewis Graham GeoCue Corporation 9668 Madison Blvd., Suite 202 Madison, AL 35758 256-461-8289 lgraham@geocue.com www.geocue.com. The Fight is On!!. Nomenclature - DSM. First Reflectance Surface. Nomenclature - DTM. “Bare” Earth. Why LIDAR?.

aisha
Download Presentation

LIDAR vs Photogrammetry?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. LIDAR vs Photogrammetry? Lewis Graham GeoCue Corporation 9668 Madison Blvd., Suite 202 Madison, AL 35758 256-461-8289 lgraham@geocue.com www.geocue.com

  2. The Fight is On!! Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  3. Nomenclature - DSM First Reflectance Surface Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  4. Nomenclature - DTM “Bare” Earth Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  5. Why LIDAR? • The original primary goal was to directly collect accurate digital elevation data at very high speeds • Primary initial goal was rapid/accurate floodplain mapping • Since its inception, the role of LIDAR has expanded to include: • LIDAR “Images” for direct true ortho generation • Extraction of data that is very difficult via photography (e.g. Transmission Line modeling) • Building extraction • 3D asset collection • General purpose mapping Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  6. Why PCDSM?(Photo-Correlated Digital Surface Models) • The original primary goal was to automatically derive accurate digital elevation data at very high speeds • Primary driver was “one source” orthophoto generation • Since its inception, the role of PCDSM has expanded to include: • 3D Visualization • Building extraction • 3D asset collection • General purpose mapping Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  7. iSTAR True Ortho (1999) Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  8. Photo-Correlated Digital Surface Models Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  9. High X, Y Spatial Resolution Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  10. But Axial Depth is Derived At least two images from different locations must see the same object space point Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  11. Spatial Filtering by Design Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  12. Correlation Noise Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  13. Voids Trees Voids Robert Bussard Occlusion, shadows, other correlation failures Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  14. Eyeball Aliasing PCDSM – Color by Z PCDSM - RGB Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  15. No Ground… Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  16. LIDAR Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  17. LIDAR directly measures X, Y ,Z(sort of…) Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  18. Only a single ray required Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  19. Modern LIDARs can detect Multiple Returns & Waveform Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  20. Laser Return Intensity Corridor mapper  1.541 microns Wide area mapper  1.064 microns Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  21. Optech Gemini Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  22. Aliasing is common Spatial filtering must be configured by the operator - Usually not understood/considered in flight planning Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  23. Comparing correlators Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  24. ~50 Image Mosaic Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  25. Comparing Contours Lower Noise Higher Noise Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  26. Flat surface noise Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  27. LIDAR vs PCDSM Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  28. Comparison Factors LIDAR Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  29. Optimal Uses LIDAR (1) Excellent if completely illuminated. Poor in shadows (2) Both have advantages/disadvantages. We are investigating. Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  30. And the winner is… There is no winner. They are completely different technologies with little overlap in applicability Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

  31. Thank You! Ohio UAS Test Center - LIDAR vs Photogrammetry

More Related