1 / 12

Accessibility and Usability For Web Sites: Accessibility 'Gotchas'

http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/eemlac-2005-01/. UKOLN is supported by:. Accessibility and Usability For Web Sites: Accessibility 'Gotchas'. In this session we will: Explore a number of common misunderstandings

Download Presentation

Accessibility and Usability For Web Sites: Accessibility 'Gotchas'

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/eemlac-2005-01/http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/web-focus/events/workshops/eemlac-2005-01/ UKOLN is supported by: Accessibility and Usability For Web Sites: Accessibility 'Gotchas' • In this session we will: • Explore a number of common misunderstandings • Explore your understanding and interpretations of WAI guidelines • Explore some of the difficulties of implementing WAI guidelines Brian Kelly UKOLN University of Bath Bath Email B.Kelly@ukoln.ac.uk URL http://www.ukoln.ac.uk/

  2. Web site with: • WAI AAA logo • WAI AA alt text • But not HTML-compliant so: • WAI A only (at best) To Logo Or Not? http://www.openia.com/accessibility/modaccessibility • You see sites with accessibility logos (WAI, Bobby, Cynthia Says, …) • Issues: • Are they patronising? • Do they distract from page design? • Are they confusing (who is Cynthia?) • Do they tell the truth? Note that displaying an accessible logo does not make your site accessible – and having a misleading logo is dishonest and makes you vulnerable to legal claims.

  3. WCAG Facts Sheet at <http://www.w3.org/1999/05/WCAG-REC-fact#text> Text-only pages should not be necessary to ensure accessibility of Web pages that follow the "Web Content Accessibility Guidelines, "except in very rare cases. In fact, text-only pages are frequently counterproductive to accessibility since they tend to be kept less up-to-date than "primary pages," or in some cases leave out information that is on primary pages. Beware Web developers who provide Web sites with WAI logos, text-only features, … Let's now explore other possible areas of confusion • Many other issues: • Many visually impaired users have some sight • Needs of dyslexic users • Why should I miss out? Text-Only Web Sites • Text-only Web sites are great for people with disabilities?

  4. Understanding / Interpreting WCAG • Exercise • Complete the Exploring Your Knowledge Of Web Accessibility Issues form • Do not spend too long on this – the aim is to explore the extend to which there is a shared agreement and interpretation of various aspects of Web accessibility

  5. Web Accessibility – It's Easy? • In order to provide accessible Web sites all you need to do is: • Follow the WAI guidelines • Add ALT tags for your images • Make sure your Web page is HTML compliant • Use CSS • Not using colour alone to distinguish between content • … • You find many Content Management System (CMS) vendors (licensed and open source) who will claim to do this 'out-of-the-box' So why do we need a day's workshop if it's simply a question of following some simple rules or using standard software?

  6. Web Accessibility – It's Difficult! • Surveys show that many public sector organisations have difficulties in providing accessible Web sites: • UK University Home Pages • Surveys in 2002 and 2004 used Bobby to analyse University home pages. Results showed that only 1.8% and 5.6% comply with WAI WCAG AA • Disability Rights Commission (DRC) Survey • DRC commissioned survey published in April 2004 which used Bobby to analyse 1,000 home pages. Results showed that over 80% fail to comply with WAI WCAG A(Note that in Dec 2004 the report itself was not available in HTML format ) Note that the UKOLN Benchmarking Web Sites workshops for NEMLAC and EEMLAC Regional Agencies give similar results

  7. Conclusions From Surveys • It should be noted that: • The automated survey can only prove that a page is inaccessible so that the findings are likely to be worse than reported • Only the home page was analysed • What can we conclude from the findings: • The community doesn't care about Web accessibility • WCAG AAA and AA compliance can be difficult toachieve (even on a single, high profile page) • There are other issues to consider • There may be other approaches to Web accessibility

  8. WCAG AA and AAA Compliance • In order to achieve WAI WCAG AA compliance: • Avoid deprecated features (e.g. FONT) • Use W3C technologies when available and appropriate (no Flash, MS Word or PowerPoint). • Use the latest versions [of W3C formats] • Create documents that validate to published formal grammars (i.e. HTML must be valid) • In order to achieve WAI WCAG AAA compliance: • Provide information so that users may receive documents according to their preferences (i.e. markup language) • Specify document collections with the LINK element and "rel" and "rev"

  9. Concerns Over WAI WCAG • Guidelines Too Theoretical • Some WCAG guidelines appear theoretical • WCAG seeks to promote W3C standards (including new ones) in addition to addressing mainstream accessibility issues • Overall WAI approach is dependent on content, authoring tools and user agent guidelines – the latter two are outside the remit of Web authors • Developments Outside Of W3C • WAI has succeeded in raising awareness of accessibility – and commercial sector has responded (cf. accessibility in OS, proprietary formats, …)

  10. Standards Or Guidelines • Are WAI's Web Content Accessibility Guidelines: • Pragmatic and much needed guidelines which can help authors to make Web pages more accessible • To be interpreted and applied sensibly - on par with Jakob Neilson's usability guidelines • or: • Mandatory standards which must be implemented in order to (a) claim WAI compliance and (b) abide with legislation • No room for interpretation Do you use GIF images or FONT tags? Use HTML 4.0? HTMLvalidation errors? WAI A is best you can achieve! 11.1   Use W3C technologies when they are available and appropriate for task and use the latest versions when supported. [Priority 2]

  11. Universal or User-Centred Design? • Universal Design: • The design of products and environments to be usable by all people, to the greatest extent possible, without the need for adaptation or specialized design<http://www.design.ncsu.edu:8120/cud/univ_design/princ_overview.htm> • Underlying principle behind WAI activities • User-Centered Design: • Ask 'Who will be using the product?'. … Once this target audience has been identified [ask] questions such as: What do you want the product to do for you? In what sort of environment will you be using the product? What are your priorities when using the software? … <http://www-3.ibm.com/ibm/easy/eou_ext.nsf/Publish/2> The word 'universal' implies a single solution will apply to all. This does not appear to reflect experiences in developing educational or cultural services or an environment which values diversity.

  12. Any Questions? • Any Questions?

More Related