Propositional Logic

Propositional Logic CS 1050 (Rosen Section 1.1, 1.2)

Proposition A proposition is a statement that is either true or false, but not both. • Atlanta was the site of the 1996 Summer Olympic games. • 1+1 = 2 • 3+1 = 5 • What will my CS1050 grade be?

Table 1. The Truth Table for the Negation of a Proposition p ¬p T F F T Definition 1. Negation of p Let p be a proposition. The statement “It is not the case that p” is also a proposition, called the “negation of p” or ¬p (read “not p”) p = The sky is blue. p = It is not the case that the sky is blue. p = The sky is not blue.

Table 2. The Truth Table for the Conjunction of two propositions p q pq T T T T F F F T F F F F Definition 2. Conjunction of p andq Let p and q be propositions. The proposition “p and q,” denoted by pq is true when both p and q are true and is false otherwise. This is called the conjunction of p and q.

Table 3. The Truth Table for the Disjunction of two propositions p q pq T T T T F T F T T F F F Definition 3. Disjunction of p and q Let p and q be propositions. The proposition “p or q,” denoted by pq, is the proposition that is false when p and q are both false and true otherwise.

Table 4. The Truth Table for the Exclusive OR of two propositions p q pq T T F T F T F T T F F F Definition 4. Exclusive or of p and q Let p and q be propositions. The exclusive or of p and q, denoted by pq, is the proposition that is true when exactly one of p and q is true and is false otherwise.

Table 5. The Truth Table for the Implication of pq. p q pq T T T T F F F T T F F T Definition 5. Implication pq Let p and q be propositions. The implication pq is the proposition that is false when p is true and q is false, and true otherwise. In this implication p is called the hypothesis (or antecedent or premise) and q is called the conclusion (or consequence).

If p, then q p implies q if p,q p only if q p is sufficient for q q if p q whenever p q is necessary for p Not the same as the if-then construct used in programming languages such as If p then S Implications

Implications • How can both p and q be false, and pq be true? • Think of p as a “contract” and q as its “obligation” that is only carried out if the contract is valid. • Example: “If you make more than $25,000, then you must file a tax return.” This says nothing about someone who makes less than $25,000. So the implication is true no matter what someone making less than $25,000 does. • Another example: • p: Bill Gates is poor. • q: Pigs can fly. • pq is always true because Bill Gates is not poor. Another way of saying the implication is • “Pigs can fly whenever Bill Gates is poor” which is true since neither p nor q is true.

Converse of p  q is q  p Contrapositive of p  q is the proposition q  p Related Implications

Table 6. The Truth Table for the biconditional pq. p q pq T T T T F F F T F F F T Definition 6. Biconditional Let p and q be propositions. The biconditional pq is the proposition that is true when p and q have the same truth values and is false otherwise. “p if and only if q, p is necessary and sufficient for q”

You do not learn the simple things well. If you learn the simple things well then the difficult things become easy. If you do not learn the simple things well, then the difficult things will not become easy. The difficult things become easy but you did not learn the simple things well. You learn the simple things well but the difficult things did not become easy. Practice p: You learn the simple things well. q: The difficult things become easy. p q  p pq p  q p  q

Truth Table Puzzle Steve would like to determine the relative salaries of three coworkers using two facts (all salaries are distinct): • If Fred is not the highest paid of the three, then Janice is. • If Janice is not the lowest paid, then Maggie is paid the most. Who is paid the most and who is paid the least?

p : Janice is paid the most. q: Maggie is paid the most. r: Fred is paid the most. s: Janice is paid the least. p q r s rp s q (rp) (sq) T F F F T F F F T F T F T F F F T T T T T F T F F F T F F F T F T F F Fred, Maggie, Janice • If Fred is not the highest paid of the three, then Janice is. • If Janice is not the lowest paid, then Maggie is paid the most.

p : Janice is paid the most. q: Maggie is paid the most. r: Fred is paid the most. s: Janice is paid the least. p q r s rp s q (rp) (sq) T F F F T T T F T F T F T F F F T T T F F F T F F F T F F F T F T T T Fred, Janice, Maggie or Janice, Maggie, Fred or Janice, Fred, Maggie • If Fred is not the highest paid of the three, then Janice is. • If Janice is the lowest paid, then Maggie is paid the most.

Bit Operations A computer bit has two possible values: 0 (false) and 1 (true). A variable is called a Boolean variable is its value is either true or false. Bit operations correspond to the logical connectives:  OR  AND  XOR Information can be represented by bit strings, which are sequences of zeros and ones, and manipulated by operations on the bit strings.

 0 1  0 1 0 0 1 1 1 0 0 0 1 1 1 1  0 1 0 0 0 1 0 1 Truth tables for the bit operations OR, AND, and XOR

Logical Equivalence • An important technique in proofs is to replace a statement with another statement that is “logically equivalent.” • Tautology: compound proposition that is always true regardless of the truth values of the propositions in it. • Contradiction: Compound proposition that is always false regardless of the truth values of the propositions in it.

Logically Equivalent • Compound propositions P and Q are logically equivalent if PQ is a tautology. In other words, P and Q have the same truth values for all combinations of truth values of simple propositions. • This is denoted: PQ (or by P Q)

Example: DeMorgans • Prove that (pq)  (p  q) p q (pq) (pq) p q (p  q) T T T F F T F F T F F F F T F F T F T F T F F F T T T T

Illustration of De Morgan’s Law (pq) p q

Illustration of De Morgan’s Law p p

Illustration of De Morgan’s Law q q

Illustration of De Morgan’s Law p  q p q

Example: Distribution Prove that: p  (q  r)  (p  q)  (p  r) p q r qr p(qr) pq pr (pq)(pr) T T T T T T T T T T F F T T T T T F T F T T T T T F F F T T T T F T T T T T T T F T F F F T F F F F T F F F T F F F F F F F F F

Prove: pq(pq)  (qp) p q pq pq qp (pq)(qp) T T T T T T T F F F T F F T F T F F F F T T T T We call this biconditional equivalence.

List of Logical Equivalences pT  p; pF  p Identity Laws pT  T; pF  F Domination Laws pp  p; pp  p Idempotent Laws (p)  p Double Negation Law pq  qp; pq  qp Commutative Laws (pq) r  p (qr); (pq)  r  p  (qr) Associative Laws

List of Equivalences p(qr)  (pq)(pr) Distribution Laws p(qr)  (pq)(pr) (pq)(p  q) De Morgan’s Laws (pq)(p  q) Miscellaneous p  p  T Or Tautology p p  F And Contradiction (pq)  (p  q) Implication Equivalence pq(pq)  (qp) Biconditional Equivalence

Propositional Logic