1 / 24

The CBM sensor digitizer

The CBM sensor digitizer. C.Dritsa IKF-Frankfurt, IPHC-Strasbourg (now at JLU Giessen). Outline. Motivation Model requirements Description of the model Important definitions (1) charge generation charge sharing Evaluation Important definitions (2) Comparison with experimental data

Download Presentation

The CBM sensor digitizer

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The CBM sensor digitizer C.Dritsa IKF-Frankfurt, IPHC-Strasbourg (now at JLU Giessen) C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  2. Outline • Motivation • Model requirements • Description of the model • Important definitions (1) • charge generation • charge sharing • Evaluation • Important definitions (2) • Comparison with experimental data • Outlook C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  3. Motivation • Digitizer model developed in order to allow simulating the CBM-MVD. • In collaboration with the IPHC-PICSEL group in Strasbourg and the IKF-MVD group in Frankfurt. • It was inspired by a detector response model developed for the ILC vertex tracker • M. Battaglia, “Response simulation of CMOS pixel sensors for the ILC vertex tracker” , Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research A 572 (2007) 274–276 C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  4. CBM-MVD response model requirements • Realistic simulations allowing to simulate: • Cluster properties: size, shape • pixel size • vary number of ADC channels of the readout • particles impinging with high incident angles • noise, fake hits • Rapid simulation features • simulate collision pile up • delta electrons (of concern in CBM) • fast, allowing high statistics simulations C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  5. Spirit of the model • Challenge: • Charge carrier transport process too complex and slow for simulation • Solution: • Parameterization of the sensor response • Use experimental data • GEANT provides only entry and exit coordinates of the particle in the volume • no dE/dx from GEANT C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  6. Reference data • Data acquired at CERN/SPS with pions 120 GeV/c • Sensor under test: MIMOSA17 • AMS 0.35 • standard low resistivity epitaxial layer • analogue output (12 bit charge resolution) • 30 µm pixel pitch • Particle incident angles 0-75 degrees (90 degrees is parallel to the sensor plane) C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  7. The digitizer C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  8. Important definitions (1) Landau Lorentz MPV C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  9. Other features • Simulated by random sampling of a distribution following a Gauss law with adjustable µ, σ • mean=0 • σ =15 electrons • Number of ADC bits adjustable • 12 bits • Pixel pitch adjustable • 30 µm C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  10. The charge of the cluster is taken by random sampling of the experimental distribution for 25 pixels 0 degrees incident angle The charge distribution among the pixels in the cluster is based on a 2D Lorentz distribution (derived from the 1D) 0 degrees incident angle The model: Input Landau: Accumulated charge on 25 pixels The simulation of inclined particles is derived by this initial parameterization. C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  11. Q0, l0 : known lincl: provided by GEANT The model: charge generation C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  12. Charge provided by Landau (25 pixels) The trajectory is divided in segments A Lorentz function corresponds to each segment The model: charge distribution Illustration for inclined track C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  13. Charge on pixel i x,y-coordinates of segment k The model Lorentz Amplitude Lorentz width L(xk,i,yk,i) Sum over segments (k) x,y-coordinates of pixel i Pixel pitch C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  14. Evaluation C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  15. Q1 Q1+Q2 Qi<0 (i~N) Q1+Q2+Q3 Q1+Q2+…+Qi Q1 Q2 Q3 Important definitions (2) Accumulated charge plot Q1>Q2>Q3… Accumulated charge (MPV) Q1 Q2 Q3 Qi N 1 2 3 … Number of Pixels The accumulated charge plot describes the charge sharing among the pixels of the cluster: e.g. the seed pixel collects ~30% of the total cluster charge. C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  16. Evaluation: MPV of Landau C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  17. Evaluation: sigma of Landau C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  18. Evaluation Average number of pixels/cluster C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  19. Evaluation: shape Simulation Experimental data C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  20. Summary and outlook • Digitizer model developed for the CBM-MVD and successfully tested with experimental data. • Model was successfully tested on High-Resistivity sensors (M.Domachowski) • Successfully tested on neutron irradiated sensors (M.Domachowski) • Simulation of MIMOSA-26 data sparcification in process (Q.Li) C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  21. Acknowledgments Thanks to: the IPHC-PICSEL group and the IKF-MVD group. In particular: IPHC: J.Baudot, M.Goffe, R.DeMasi, M.Winter IKF: M.Deveaux, M.Domachowski, Q.Li, J.Stroth C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  22. Backup C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

  23. High-Res MAPS: Measurement vs. simulation Melissa Domachowski Simulation of HR-MAPS with the MVD-digitiser: OK Simulation of irradiated MAPS: OK C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011 Simulation of irradiated MAPS in CBM-Root Melissa Domachowski - CBM Collaboration Meeting, Dresden 2011

  24. Particle yields C.Dritsa, St.Odile, 08 September 2011

More Related