1 / 30

The impact of triage on management of referrals to a pain service

The impact of triage on management of referrals to a pain service. Cathy Price FPM Spring Meeting Newcastle 2010. Triage…. A system used to allocate a scarce commodity, such as food, only to those capable of deriving the greatest benefit from it. French, from trier, to sort, from Old French.

bernie
Download Presentation

The impact of triage on management of referrals to a pain service

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. The impact of triage on management of referrals to a pain service Cathy Price FPM Spring Meeting Newcastle 2010

  2. Triage… • A system used to allocate a scarce commodity, such as food, only to those capable of deriving the greatest benefit from it. French, from trier, to sort, from Old French

  3. The Problem – Soton in 2002 pain cannot be managed Dodgy thinking had lead to dodgy expectations 50,000 care population-endless waiting list for specialist medical care

  4. Demand v capacity

  5. Government Pilots - Shifting Care Closer to Home Our Health Our Car Our say: large patient survey – waiting times/ease of access most important 6 areas pilots started 2002 • Orthopaedics • ENT • Surgery • Gynaecology • Urology • Dermatology Review started 2006 & 18 week target introduced

  6. Local Health Board’s expectations of Orthopaedic service? • end the scatter gun effect for MSK referrals and doctor shopping • Local access • Informed choice • Greater emphasis on pain managament

  7. Overview 19th March 2009

  8. Keys to success • High quality staff with clear roles and skills • Effective team working • As clear a picture as possible of the person being triaged • Decision support tools to enable accurate signposting • Validated questionnaires • Easy access to investigations

  9. Barriers to Change • Professional : • knowledge low in primary care • Lack of confidence in non medical staff by doctors • System: • Lack of joined upness • Unclear care pathways • Data: • Routine hospital data lacked sufficient detail

  10. Challenges • “the rise and fall of the MPTT” • British Orthopaedic Journal 2006

  11. Professional - 1 • Knowledge low in primary care • General Practitioners unable to select accurately patients for physiotherapy versus more skilled assessment lad to long queues • Solution: • Administrators telephone questionnaire • 33% redirected within the service

  12. Professional 2 - Improving clinical decision making - Decision Tools • Pain Team unclear as to who to triage wherePsychosocial factors scored – crude scale • Supported by: BDI/PainDetect/Bradford Needs Questionnaire • MSK spinal assessment team: • Pain Catastrophising Scale • Pain self efficacy questionnaire • MRI using informed decision making tool – MBUR 6

  13. Professional - – Physiotherapists not recognising psychosocial barriers • Keele tools http://www.keele.ac.uk/research/pchs/pcmrc/dissemination/tools/startback • University run courses on “yellow flags” • Extended scope practitioner modular course Psychosocial obstacles to recovery – enhanced package – CBT practitioners High risk Explanations – coaching/pain relief Medium risk Reassurance , pain relief Low risk

  14. System- Role of spinal surgery in care pathway • Direct access to spinal surgery – confusing • Review of NICE guidance by Public health priorities committee – spinal surgery LOW PRIORITY. • Spinal surgeons agreed to end direct access for non emergencies 2010 • Map of Medicine pathway for spines

  15. Decision Aids reduce rates of discretionary surgery RR=0.76 (0.6, 0.9) O’Connor et al., Cochrane Library, 2009

  16. NHS Direct a For health advice and reassurance, hours 24 day, days a year. 0845 4647 • Search • Home • About this tool • Resources • References • Glossary • Sign out • Home | • 4. The treatment options | • Lifestyle Changes • 1. Introduction to knee arthritis • 2. About you • 3. How bad is your pain? • 4. The treatment options • Lifestyle Changes • Weight Loss • Exercise • Physical Management • Pain medications • Injections • Complementary Therapies • Surgery • 5. Comparing the treatments • 6. Check your knowledge • 7. What's best for you? • 8. Your treatment choice • 9. Your summary information • 10. What's next? 365 OA Knee - Some Screen Shots Lifestyle Changes • Weight Loss • Exercise • 4. The treatment options • Physical Management Lifestyle changes Lifestyle changes have few risks, can reduce pain and improve mobility. Exercising and losing weight can benefit your overall health too. Self Management Everyone with a long-term condition such as knee arthritis tries to find their own way to help and cope with their problem; this is what we call self-management. However it is not always easy to find out about all the things that can help, and the best way of going about it. Taking control of managing your arthritis can have a life-changing impact on your wellbeing. It encourages an acceptance that arthritis affects you, but you do not allow it to control you. Education about arthritis and the support that is available are simple but powerful steps to regain control of your life, even if you have had arthritis for years.  It can enable you to return to work and participate in everyday activities including social and recreational events. Ask your health professional about local "Self Care" courses or look at the websites listed in the resources section. Read more

  17. Lack of” joined upness” • Shared record systems • Paper notes • Hampshire Health care record • PACS - picture archive system

  18. Data • Large spreadsheets to measure processes • Development of secondary user services data • Kaiser system

  19. Assurance • Audit commission asked to review service- reported excellent outcomes • Nominated site for Department of health review of “care closer to home” the estimated cost of the Orthopaedic Choice service was 39% less than the £2,840,916 which would have been incurred if all the referrals had been seen by secondary care providers.

  20. Outcomes MSK triage - 2009/10 • Mixture of Physiotherapists, Occupational therapists, podiatry, General practitioners • 3865 referred to MSK Triage • 1.2% referred to surgery

  21. Outcomes Pain Triage • Nurse.Physiotherapist.Occupational therapist + doctors at end – all referrals screened by medical staff according to locally agreed criteria • 1500 referred - pop: 50,000 • c. 850 seen by MDT • 150 – re-referrals – problem solving session • 500 advice /further investigation not the right time • Hospital care criteria : ED admissions, Strong opioids, dependency on medical model, under other services c 250 patients p.a.

  22. Overall Outcomes of Assessment for Level of Need 19% community care 47% other pathway 34% Complex care management

  23. User Surveys • 88% felt the assessment process was about right • 75% were satisfied with the outcome of assessment • A small number were unclear as to the next step

  24. Case Mix

  25. Other solutions? • STEPS – Stephanie Davies Perth introduction of self care programme removed people from the waiting list in 45% • Clark AJ, Beauprie I, Clark LB , Lynch M: A triage approach to managing a waiting list. Pain Research Management 2005; 10:3:155-7 • 600 triaged • 26% benefitted by written recommendations alone to primary care

  26. Conclusions • The magnitude of chronic pain can be managed by careful clinical and administrative processes • Multiple barriers require careful solutions • These systems are fragile and require excellent data and auditing.

  27. References JOINT WORKING? An audit of the implementation of the Department of Health’s musculoskeletal services framework ARMA June 2009 Department of Health, A joint responsibility: doing it differently – the musculoskeletal services framework, 12 July 2006 NHS Institute Delivering Quality and Value Focus On: Musculoskeletal Interface Services NHS Institute for Improvement 2009 Shifting care from hospitals to the community: a review of the evidence on quality and efficiency. B. Sibbald, R. McDonald . M. Roland. J Health Serv Res Policy 2007;12:110-11

More Related