1 / 17

E nvironmental I mpact A ssessment

E nvironmental I mpact A ssessment. Geog 456 – Spring 2008 Paul Fraser. Introduction. Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) “an assessment of the impact of a planned activity on the environment.” { United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1991)}

Download Presentation

E nvironmental I mpact A ssessment

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EnvironmentalImpactAssessment Geog 456 – Spring 2008 Paul Fraser

  2. Introduction Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) “an assessment of the impact of a planned activity on the environment.” {United Nations Economic Commission for Europe (1991)} “ an examination, analysis, and assessment of planned activities with a view to ensuring environmentally sound and sustainable development.” (Thompson & Ross, 2002)

  3. Brief History • Established in the USA in 1969. • EIA was created because of increasing environmental awareness. • The Canadian Environmental Assessment Act was passed on January 19, 1995. • Encourages actions that promote sustainable development. • Promotes cooperation and coordinated action. • Ensures that development does not cause adverse environmental effects in areas surrounding the development. • Ensures opportunity for public participation throughout the process.

  4. Objectives of the EIA process • To identify and predict the impacts of human activities on the biophysical environment and on human health and well-being. • To interpret and communicate information regarding those impacts and to investigate and propose means for their management. • To allow people to adjust development projects to enhance their benefits and to minimize their environmental costs. • During the process, Environmental Impact Statements (EIS) are prepared to document the information and estimates of impacts derived from the various steps in the EIA process. • EIA is both an ASSESSMENT TOOL and a MANAGEMENT TOOL.

  5. Assessment Tool • EIA is an assessment tool because the impacts are interpreted, which means that, while having a substantial scientific component to it, it is very much based on human values. Management Tool • EIA also involves proposing means for managing the impacts of the project.

  6. The EIA Process • A systematic process… focussing on prevention and utilizing holistic, multidisciplinary methods. • Normally implemented by governments and lending agencies • Involves an interdisciplinary team approach integrating the natural and social sciences and the environmental design arts.

  7. The Stages of EIA Stage 1: Screening - Is an EIA needed? • Screeningseeks to focus on projects with potentially significant adverse environmental impacts or whose impacts are not fully known. • Two main approaches: • The use of thresholds - Project characteristics or anticipated project impacts • A case-by-case approach –Appraisal of project characteristics against guidelines and criteria.

  8. Stage 2: Scoping - Which impacts and issues to consider? • Scoping is identifying the issues and determining their priority for the EIA process, by way of information gathering and negotiation. • Involves: • scientific and technical specialists, • the developer, • members of the affected public, • interest groups, • and the project proponent. • The result: • the identification of the main issues and impacts, • an explanation of why other issues are not considered significant • Description of the project / development action and alternatives • Description of an environmental baseline

  9. Stage 3: Impact Prediction and Assessment • To identify the magnitude and other dimensions of change in the environment with a project or action, in comparison with the situation without that project or action. • Methods of prediction are quite varied, reflecting the wide variety of issues that can be seen throughout the process. • There are many predictive methods: • Extrapolative: trend analysis, scenarios, analogies • Normative: working backwards from desired outcomes • Once predicted, significance must be determined.

  10. Stage 3: Impact Prediction and Assessment • Significance may be determined by considering such factors as: • The nature and extent of the impacts (type, duration) • Likely adverse effects on the receiving environment (sensitive areas) • Magnitude of impacts (low, medium, high) • Options for impact mitigation (reduction, avoidance) • Reversibility • Availability of compensation or offsets (new wetland construction to replace lost wetland) • Identification of mitigating measures • Public consultation and participation

  11. Stage 4: Presentation, Review, and Decision-Making – Submission of EIS & Project Planning Application. • An EIS should: • Be comprehensive and at least fulfil the requirements of the relevant EIA legislation. • Explain why some impacts are not dealt with. • Emphasize key points. • Be honest, unbiased, and objective. • Good presentation can convey: • a concern for the environment, • and a positive attitude to the public. • Bad presentation can suggest: • lack of care, • perhaps lack of financial backing, • and can also negatively affect even a well-organized EIS.

  12. Stage 4: Presentation, Review, and Decision-Making – Submission of EIS & Project Planning Application. • A review aims to: • Ensure all relevant information has been analysed and presented; • Assess the validity and accuracy of information contained in the EIS; • Consider whether additional information is needed; • Assess the significance of the project’s environmental effects; • Evaluate the need for mitigation and monitoring of environmental impacts; • Advise on whether a project should be allowed to proceed. • In the decision-making phase, the decision to authorize or reject a project is made. (in the form of a public document.)

  13. Stage 5: Post-decision Monitoring and Auditing of Predictions and Mitigation Measures. • Monitoring and Auditing can provide for better planning and EIA of future projects. • Monitoring involves the measuring and recording of physical, social and economic variables associated with development impacts (ex: traffic flows, air quality, noise, employment levels). • can be used to identify harmful trends in a locality before it is too late for remedial action. • can help to identify and correct unanticipated impacts. • Auditing compares the impacts predicted in an EIS with those that actually occur after implementation, in order to assess whether the impact prediction performs satisfactorily.

  14. Stage 6: Follow-up Studies. • It is essential to ensure that the good environmental management plans developed for the project are actually implemented. • EIAs should not be looked at as a means of obtaining a planning permission, but rather as a means to obtain good environmental management over the whole life of the project. • Very effective and necessary means of continuing the EIA process. • The EIA process involves learning from the project for application to future projects.

  15. Stage 1 Stage 2 Stage 3 Stage 4 Stage 6 if project proceeds to implementation phase. Stage 5

  16. Strengths and Weaknesses • EIA focuses on prevention of harmful impacts. It is a proactive, rather than reactive approach to development! • Information about the impacts must be communicated to both the decision makers and the public who might be affected by the proposed developments, before the project is implemented. • The scoping stage can be underestimated. Accuracy is essential. • Impact prediction and determining the impact significance. Intuition is often labelled as expert opinion. • Few developers make a real effort to gain a sense of the public’s view before presenting their applications for authorization. • EISs are often used to justify, not assess decisions; therefore, lack of objectivity can pose a problem.

  17. References • Canadian Environmental Assessment Agency, accessed online from http://www.ceaa.gc.ca • Glasson, John, Therivel, Riki, & Chadwick, Andrew, (2005). Introduction to Environmental Impact Assessment: 3rd Edition. Routledge, New York, NY. • Joao, Elsa (2001). How scale affects environmental impact assessment. Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Vol. 22, Issue 4. Pg 289-310. • Thompson, Dixon, Ross, William A. (2002). Tools for Environmental Management. New Society Publishers, Gabriola, BC. • Wood, Christopher (1995). Environmental Impact Assessment: A Comparative Review. Longman Group Limited, Essex, England.

More Related