1 / 19

How are the nitrogen standards reduced? Ruth Grant

How are the nitrogen standards reduced? Ruth Grant National Environmental Reseach Institute Aarhus University. Content. Principles for N standard reduction Basis for calculation The annual calculation Conclusion. 1. Principles for N standard reduction.

Download Presentation

How are the nitrogen standards reduced? Ruth Grant

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. How are the nitrogen standards reduced? Ruth Grant National Environmental Reseach InstituteAarhus University

  2. Content • Principles for N standard reduction • Basis for calculation • The annualcalculation • Conclusion

  3. 1. Principles for N standard reduction

  4. Background (Action Plan III, 2005) • Decision takingplace from 2005/06 • The economic optimum for nitrogen standards shallbe set at a the cropyield, whichwould have beenoptainedwithoutrestrictions in N use • The nitrogen standards used by the farmersshallbereduced by minimim 10% relative to the economic optimum • The nitrogen quota at the national levelmust not exceed the quota in 2003/04 (next slide)

  5. National nitrogen quota The nitrogen quota at the national level = national nitrogen bag • must not exceed the quota in 2003/04, adjusted for the crop rotation

  6. Implications

  7. Problems to be addressed • In 2005 the EU subsidypayment changed to the single payment – increase in registeredagriculturalarea (nochange in actualarea): adjustmentneeded • Action Plan III from 2005 had severalareaassignments – actualdecrease in agriculturalarea: noeffect on N bag and noeffect of measures • In 2008 no longer set-aside obligations - actualincrease in agriculturalarea: noeffect on N bag

  8. Overall principle • N bag adjustedeachyearbased on • Crop rotation (step 1) • New areaassigned for roads, buildings etc. (step 2) • N standard reduction % calculatedaccording to adjusted N bag (step 3) Twoyears of timelag relative to actual agricuturalarea 2010/2011: 385 000 tons N • N rate per ha: economic optimum for eachcropreduced by N standard reduction% (step 4)

  9. 2. Basis for calculation

  10. Basis - calculation of N bag for 2003/04

  11. Basis - calculation of N bag for 2003/04- adjusted for extra registered area in 2005

  12. 3. The annual calculation

  13. Calculation of N bag for 2010/11 (step 1): - based on N rates in 2004 and crop rotaion in 2009, adjusted to the area in 2004

  14. Calculation of adjusted N bag in 2011 (step 2):- adjusted for area assigned for roads, etc. • N quota in 2011 (step 1): 386 924 tons N • Area in 2009: 2671 700 ha • Average N standard: 144.8 kg N/ha • Area assigned for roads etc: 10 000 ha • Reduction in N quota (step 2): 1 448 tons N • N bag in 2011: 385 476 tons N

  15. Calculation of N standard reduction in 2011 (step 3) *) for loamy sand **) adjusted for soil type and residual effect

  16. Calculation of N rate for crops (step 4) The Plant Directorate publishes an announcement each year with updated N rates for each crop and 5 different soil types *) for loamy sand

  17. 4. Conclusions

  18. N standard reduction obtained • % reduction N bag (1000 tons) • 2005/06 14,3 % 362 942 • 2006/07 14,4 % 362 942* • 2007/08 15,0 % 362 942* • 2008/09 14,5 % 368 543 • 2009/10 15,5 % 381 655 • 2010/11 16,0 % 385 476 * No corrections for largerregisteredagriculturalarea

  19. Effect of change in agric area • tackled • VMP III – reduction in agric. area • Roads, buildings, etc. √ • Afforestation ÷ • Wetlands, bufferzones÷ • No Set- aside - increase in agric. area • 81000 ha in 2008 • + 35 000 ha in 2009 Increased norm reduction in 2010 and 2011, √ but temporaryincrease in fertilser use in 2008 and 2009

More Related