1 / 43

Sampling microbial diversity using fragment analysis: When is an OTU an ESU?

Sampling microbial diversity using fragment analysis: When is an OTU an ESU?. Patterns of microbial diversity and community composition • What factors regulate community diversity and composition? • How do humans influence microbial communities?

calix
Download Presentation

Sampling microbial diversity using fragment analysis: When is an OTU an ESU?

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Sampling microbial diversity using fragment analysis: When is an OTU an ESU?

  2. Patterns of microbial diversity and community composition • What factors regulate community diversity and composition? • How do humans influence microbial communities? • Does microbial diversity change along environmental gradients? • Do communities from different locations (treatments) differ? • Are there patterns of community structure?

  3. What are we measuring? Species? Operational Taxonomic Units? Ecotypes? • Sequence based diversity estimates • • which gene? • • how much to sequence? • how to define OTUs? (95%, 97%, 99%--non transitive relationships) • Non-sequence based diversity estimates • • tRFLP, ARISA, SNPs, AFLP • • Often quick, cheap, easy • • Only a proxy for actual sequence diversity present • For tRFLP, ARISA one peak = 1 OTU (or does it?)

  4. Compare OTUs to ESUs Evolutionarily Significant Unit

  5. GG CC GG CC GGTC GG CC CC GG CC GG CCAG CC GG Separate by size Type A Type B markers 1000 bp 750 bp Smaller fragments 500 bp 250 bp Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphisms Type A Type B GGCC GGCC GGTC GGCC CCGG CCGG CCAG CCGG

  6. high B/A low B/A MIT9201 MIT9302 MIT9211 MIT9215 MIT9312 MIT9313 MIT9202 MED4 MIT9303 SS120 1500 bp 1000 bp 500 bp 100 bp RFLPs of individuals RsaI digests of the ITS-23S rRNA distinguish Prochlorococcus ecotypes

  7. markers 1000 bp Type A 750 bp Type B 500 bp 250 bp t-RFLP= terminal Restriction Fragment Length Polymorphism Use 1 Fluorescently labeled primer in PCR Digest with restriction enzyme Run fragments on gel—Visualize using fluorescence detector Only bands containing fluorescent primer are seen

  8. Each sequence in pool represented by single peak (barring incomplete digestion issues) Each peak treated as OTU What is the level of sequence diversity within a peak? DEPENDS….. Relative Fluorescence Units DNA (bp)

  9. ARISA---Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis Based on length differences in rRNA intergenic spacer 16S rRNA 23S rRNA Fisher and Triplett AEM 1999

  10. Intergenic spacer lengths can be variable at fine phylogenetic scales Rocap et al 2002 AEM

  11. Separate by size sample markers 1000 bp Relative fluorescence units (RFUs) 750 bp Smaller fragments 500 bp 250 bp DNA (base pairs) ARISA---Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis Strategy: Amplify intergenic spacer using primers (universal or group specific) targeted to conserved positions in rRNA genes 16S rRNA 23S rRNA or

  12. Salinity 60 50 40 OTUs 30 20 10 0 0 10 20 30 (PSU) What can we do with these OTUs? Community A B C Community analyses Treat each OTU as a “taxonomic unit of richness” Regression Richness - how many? Does richness vary with the environment? R2 = 0.96 p = 0.0019

  13. 2a X 100 2a + b + c S i t e A S i t e B S i t e C S i t e D S i t e E S i t e A S i t e B S i t e C S i t e D S i t e E OTU 1 1 1 1 0 1 S i t e A 1 OTU 2 1 1 0 1 0 S i t e B x 1 OTU 3 0 1 1 0 0 S i t e C x x 1 OTU 4 0 0 1 1 0 S i t e D x x x 1 OTU 5 0 1 1 0 0 S i t e E x x x x 1 OTU 6 1 0 1 0 0 Community Analyses Community A B C Incidence matrix Similarity matrix Sorensen similarity coefficient where a = # OTUs in both b = # OTUs in X only c = # OTUs in Y only

  14. Community analyses Community A B C Community composition - who? Does composition vary with the environment? Analysis of Similarity (ANOSIM & NMDS) Pasture composition differed from forest & plantation composition (p<0.001). Carney et al. (2004) Ecology Letters

  15. The sample set: active and inactive carbonate chimneys Young, hot, actively chimneys: 40-85ºC, pH 9-11 Chimney containing minerals exposed to both hot fluids and background SW Old chimneys with little or no venting: <10ºC, pH 8 Brazelton et al. 2006

  16. Ecological succession of Lost City Archaea (WJ Brazelton, 2006)

  17. What size is a peak anyway? Fluorescent size standard Fluorescently labelled PCR product RFU’s 142 190 170 160 150 120 DNA (BP)

  18. What size is a peak anyway? 233.2 210.0 167.8 ?

  19. Diffusive spread of larger peaks

  20. Solutions? Thresholds for peak calling-- signal:noise cutoff % area or % peak height cutoff helps to standardize amount of DNA loaded onto gel (ie 10ng) Binning-- at minimum data must be binned in 1bp bins so 233.2 and 233.3 are counted as the same fragment typically 1-3 bp bins < 500 bp 3-5 bp 500-1000 bp 10 bp > 1000 bp

  21. Iterative binning strategy Use maximal similarity between two samples to address null hypothesis that communities are different Hewson and Fuhrman 2006 Microbial Ecology

  22. T-RFLP specific issues : which enzymes to pick? How many to use? In silico analysis of 4603 bacterial SSU rRNA sequences and 18 common REs Engebretson and Moyer, 2003 AEM

  23. But what if……? • You already have a clone library from the same/related environment • You are using group specific primers to differentiate subtypes of interest • You are using a locus other than the SSU rRNA (functional gene, ITS etc….) Then how do you choose enzymes?

  24. REPK: Restriction enzyme picker Rationally chooses enzymes that discriminate user-defined sequence groups Collins and Rocap, 2007 NAR http://rocaplab.ocean.washington.edu/tools/repk

  25. REPK: Restriction enzyme picker http://rocaplab.ocean.washington.edu/tools/repk

  26. REPK: Output Terminal fragment lengths of all sequences with all enzymes http://rocaplab.ocean.washington.edu/tools/repk

  27. REPK: Output Visual view of which enzymes are capable of distinguishing each user-defined group http://rocaplab.ocean.washington.edu/tools/repk

  28. REPK: Output Enzymes are binned together based on their ability to discriminate groups http://rocaplab.ocean.washington.edu/tools/repk

  29. REPK: Final Output Sets of enzymes that together can distinguish all user defined sequence groups http://rocaplab.ocean.washington.edu/tools/repk

  30. Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer in silico Analysis (ARISISA)355 complete bacterial genomes in GenBank Wrabel and Rocap

  31. Fragment lengths: predominant bacterial phyla Genera/species

  32. 70 Alpha-Proteobacteria Actinobacteria 0 Bacteroidetes/Chlorobi Beta- Delta- Chlamydiae Sequences Cyanobacteria Epsilon- Firmicutes Gamma- A single ARISA peak can represent more than one group or species of bacteria. Some groups display minimal overlap. ARISA fragment lengths (bps)

  33. Intraspecific variability in ARISA peaks due to multiple operons Number of ribosomal operons: 1 – 15 Predicted ARISA peaks per strain: 1 - 9!!

  34. Time to play ARISA detective … A B Relative fluorescence units (RFUs) C APhotobacterium profundum B 2 Prochlorococcus strains, 3 Synechococcus strains. CColwellia psychrerythraea DNA (base pairs) 0 1500

  35. Intraspecific variability in ARISA peaks due to multiple operons 7 Prochlorococcus, 7 Synechococcus Colwellia psychrerythraea Geobacillus kaustophilus, Photobacterium profundum Vibrio cholerae Number of ribosomal operons: 1 – 15 Predicted ARISA peaks per strain: 1 - 9!!

  36. Bacteria associated with the diatom Pseudo-nitzchia Kaczmarska et al. 2005 Harmful Algae

  37. Relative fluorescence units (RFUs) DNA (base pairs) Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis (ARISA) ITS (variable) 23S 16S amplify ITS with fluorescent label gram + bacteria DNA extraction 3 µm AB 0.2 µm FLB 2 ng exponential stationary run on capillary sequencer with internal size standard 10 ng PCR product, purified

  38. P. delicatissimaP. pungensChaetoceros socialisDitylum brightwelliiThalassiosira sp. Are diatom-associated bacterial assemblages found among field data? YES Isolates + field filters from 3 stations: P1, P17, P38

  39. 19 Pseudo-nitzschia spp. 8 Ditylum brightwellii 2 Thalassiosira sp. 1 Chaetoceros socialis Origins of diatom isolates P. multiseries P. australis, P. fraudulenta P. callianthaP. cuspidata (tentative ID) P. delicatissimaP. multiseriesP. pungensC. socialisD.brightwelliiThalassiosira sp.

  40. Patterns related to Pseudo-nitzschia species? Null hypothesis: Bacterial assemblages are the same between Pseudo-nitzschia species. R = 1; p = 0.01 Bacterial assemblages differ with Pseudo-nitzschia species. Michele Wrabel

  41. Conclusions Fragment analysis methods offer a means to interrogate a large number of samples fairly rapidly and inexpensively Ability to ask (and answer!) ecological questions about microbial communities Important to be aware of both the strengths and limitations of the techniques to interpret data correctly

  42. Thanks to the F.A.M.O.U.S. gang Billy Brazelton Eric Collins Colleen Evans Clara Fuchsman Claire Horner-Devine Kate Hubbard Andrew Opatkiewicz Jess Silver Michele Wrabel

  43. ARISA---Automated Ribosomal Intergenic Spacer Analysis Partial ARISA profiles of the bacterial communities in Crystal Bog Lake (A), Lake Mendota (B), and Sparkling Lake (C) during the summer of 1998. In each panel, the red and black electropherograms represent duplicate PCRs that were performed on a single sample from each site. Fisher and Triplett AEM 1999

More Related