1 / 7

802.11 TGmb Editor’s Report – May 2009

802.11 TGmb Editor’s Report – May 2009. Authors:. Date: 2009-05-11. Abstract. This submission contains the editorial status of P802.11mb as at the May 2009 802.11 session. Editorial Panel. Volunteers who responded to the March appeal:

chase-woodward
Download Presentation

802.11 TGmb Editor’s Report – May 2009

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. 802.11 TGmb Editor’s Report – May 2009 Authors: Date: 2009-05-11 Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  2. Abstract This submission contains the editorial status of P802.11mb as at the May 2009 802.11 session. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  3. Editorial Panel • Volunteers who responded to the March appeal: • Brad Lynch, Eldad Perahia, Harry Worstell, Joe Kwak, Jon Rosdahl, Jouni Malinen, Kaberi Banerjee, Mark Hamilton, Matthew Gast, Michael Montemurro, Peter Ecclesine, Sudheer Grandhi, Stephen McCann, Gary Anwyl • Volunteers who participated in D0.02-D0.04 review: • Brad Lynch, Eldad Perahia, Joe Kwak, Jon Rosdahl, Jouni Malinen, Kaberi Banerjee, Mark Hamilton, Matthew Gast, Peter Ecclesine, Sudheer Grandhi, Stephen McCann, Gary Anwyl • Volunteers who participated in D0.05 review: • Matthew Gast, Mark Hamilton, Peter Ecclesine, Jon Rosdahl, Sudheer Grandhi, Kaberi Banerjee, Eldad Perahia. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  4. Status of Drafts Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  5. Process • Since March 2009 802.11 session, a review was held of D0.02-D0.04 against the published amendments. • A total of 255 defects were reported, of which 178 resulted in some change to the draft. • D0.05 includes speculative editing of comment resolutions in 11-08/1127r17 agreed in TGmb telecons. • One remaining unedited issue is CID 61 (power-saving of management frames). • Expect to product a D0.06 incorporating resolution of defects in D0.05 from 11-07/1127r17 and any additional changes approved in TGmb in the May session. • Want to minimize these changes to reduce the time taken to produce this draft. Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  6. Editorial Motion Approve Draft P802.11REVmb_D0.05 as the TGmb draft. Moved: Adrian Stephens / Seconded: Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

  7. Letter Ballot Motion • Having approved and comment resolutions for all of the comments received on STD 802.11-2007, • Having incorporated these comment resolutions and having incorporated all the published amendments (STD 802.11k-2008, STD 802.11r-2008, STD 802.11y-2008), resulting in Draft P802.11REVmb_D1.0, • Approve a 30 day Working Group Technical Letter Ballot asking the question “Should TGmb Draft 1.0 be forwarded to Sponsor Ballot?” Adrian Stephens, Intel Corporation

More Related