1 / 42

EMG BLIND SPOTS

EMG BLIND SPOTS. Know what your EMG might miss!. Introduction. Speakers Tony Chiodo , MD Timothy Dillingham, MD W. David Arnold, MD Shawn Jorgensen, MD. Introduction. Blind spots. Introduction. “ Electrodiagnostic impression : Normal study…”.

dara-dodson
Download Presentation

EMG BLIND SPOTS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. EMG BLIND SPOTS Know what your EMG might miss!

  2. Introduction • Speakers • Tony Chiodo, MD • Timothy Dillingham, MD • W. David Arnold, MD • Shawn Jorgensen, MD

  3. Introduction Blind spots

  4. Introduction “Electrodiagnostic impression: Normal study…”

  5. Generalized peripheral neuropathies “Electrodiagnostic impression: No generalized peripheral neuropathy…”

  6. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #1 • 29 year old female with one week of numbness, prickly sensation and pain in the feet, progressing to the calves, later in the hands, lips, mouth. • Four days ago began having difficulty going up stairs, getting out of chairs, getting her legs in her pants, getting her arms overhead • Balancing is worsening • No oculobulbar, bowel or bladder symptoms • 2 weeks prior saw PCP, diagnosed with a URI, given a tetanus and influenza vaccine

  7. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #1 • Physical examination • CN – normal • Motor • 4/5 elbow extension, DIP flexion, ankle dorsiflexion, toe extension, 5-/5 hip flexion • Functionally could not get out of chair without using her arms • Sensory • Pinprick, vibration normal • Romberg positive • MSR • 1+ brachioradialis, others areflexic

  8. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #1 • Electrodiagnostics • Motor – normal except • Left median to APB: decreased amplitude prox + distally • Right fibular: 25% amplitude loss proximal to distal, decreased CV • Left tibial: prolonged DML, decreased CV • Sensory – normal except • Right sural, bilateral medial dorsal cutaneous prolonged PL • Late responses • F-waves – decreased amplitude ulnar bilaterally, o/w normal • H-reflex – absent bilaterally • NEE • Left upper, lower, paraspinals normal

  9. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #1 • “Electrodiagnostic Impression: Abnormal study. Mild generalized sensorimotor neuropathy.”

  10. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Guillain-Barre Syndrome • Acute, autoimmune neuropathy • Clinically presents with acutely progressive sensory dysfunction and weakness, usually in an ascending pattern, progressing for less that four weeks • Exam should demonstrate sensory loss (particularly large fiber), weakness of both proximal and distal muscles, and hyporeflexia

  11. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Guillain-Barre Syndrome • EMG findings in GBS • Sensorimotor • Non length-dependent • Acquired demyelination • Abnormal temporal dispersion • Conduction block

  12. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Guillain-Barre Syndrome • EMG findings in early GBS • Demyelination (Albers 1985) • Week 1 - 50% meet full demyelinating criteria • Week 5 – 87% meet criteria • Late Responses – week 1 (Gordon 2001) • 97% abnormal H reflexes (88% day 4) • 87% abnormal F waves

  13. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Guillain-Barre Syndrome • Non length-dependence • Abnormal upper limb/normal lower limb • “Sural sparing” • 50% of patients by week 1 (Gordon 2001)

  14. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • EMG BLIND SPOTS!! • Guillain-Barre syndrome • Early normal/minimally abnormal EDX • Look for late responses • Normal sural • Look for abnormal upper limb

  15. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #1 – revised impression • “Electrodiagnostic Impression: Abnormal study. Mild generalized peripheral neuropathy; cannot exclude early AIDP • Clinical Impression: Monitor closely for worsening neurological symptoms and repeat NCS in one week if symptoms don’t improve or worsen. Consider consultation with a neuromuscular specialist.”

  16. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #2 • 67 year old patient with slowly progressive ambulatory decline • Thinks it has been going on for 3 years • Feels weakness is in his legs and has some in arms as well • When asked, notes numbness in feet and hands • No oculobulbar or sphincter complaints • PMH: DM2, mild CHF

  17. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #2 • Physical examination • Cranial nerves - normal • Motor – normal excepts • 3+/5 right, 4/5 left arm abduction • 4/5 finger abduction • 2/5 hip flexion • 4/5 knee extension • 4/5 right, 3-/5 left ankle dorsiflexion • MSR • Trace in uppers, 0 in lowers • Sensation • Absent vibration at ankles • Pinprick normal

  18. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #2 • Electrodiagnostics • Motor NCS • Diffusely diminished conduction velocities • Dramatic temporal dispersion across the forearm on right ulnar motor • Lower limb studies unobtainable • Sensory NCS • Lowers unobtainable • Ulnar sensory low amplitude • Needle EMG • Abnormal spontaneous activity, large amplitude MUAP in distal LE muscles

  19. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #2 • “Electrodiagnostic Impression: Abnormal study. Generalized sensorimotor neuropathy with axonal and demyelinating features.”

  20. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • CIDP • Chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy • MS of the PNS (Amato 2009) • Autoimmune • demyelinating • often relapsing/remitting course, other progressive • More common than you think! • Of those with cryptogenic neuropathy referred for intensive referral center investigation, about 1/5 have CIDP (and are treatable) (Dyck 1981)

  21. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • CIDP • Clinical features • Progresses for 8 weeks or more • Weakness classically proximal and distal, symmetrical • Hyporeflexia • Sensory complaints • Lab features • EDX – diffuse sensorimotor acquired demyelination (similar to AIDP) • CSF – cytoalbuminic dissociation

  22. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • CIDP • Atypical forms • Not all meet even basic clinical features • Asymmetrical or pure sensory in 50% cases (Breiner 2014)

  23. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • CIDP • Criteria (AAN) • Clinical • Motor and or sensory loss in >1 limb • Hyporeflexic • Over 2 months • Electrodiagnostic • 3 out of 4 • CB/TD in >=1 nerve • CV decreased in >=2 nerves • DL prolonged in >=2 nerves • FW prolonged in >=2 nerves

  24. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • CIDP • Criteria • At least 15! • No consensus • Sensitivities range from 11-91% (Breiner 2014) • False negatives – treatable patients missed • Specificity range from 63-100% (Breiner 2014) • False positives – non-treatable patients exposed to unnecessary risks, MAJOR costs • Of those with treatable disease (by expert consensus), about 1/3 never met ANY criteria (Bromberg 1991)

  25. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #2 • Diagnostics • CSF analysis • Protein 97, otherwise normal • Treatment • Moderate improvement with IVIg • Strength improved to >=4/5 proximal muscles • Reflexes 2+ uppers, patella • Able to ambulate with walker and minimal assistance

  26. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • BLIND SPOTS!! • CIDP • Not meeting criteria • Consider those with basic clinical features • Asymmetrical, no proximal and distal weakness • Consider asymmetrical, pure sensory forms

  27. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #2 – revised impression • “Electrodiagnostic Impression: Abnormal study. Generalized peripheral neuropathy with features of acquired demyelination; suspicious for but not meeting research criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinating polyneuropathy (CIDP)” • “Clinical Impression: This patient may have a non-classic form of CIDP. Consultation with a neuromuscular specialist and lumbar puncture could be considered.”

  28. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #3 • 47 year old with 2 months of cramping, numbness and tingling on the anterolateral ankle and dorsal foot • Has had numbness in the right hand for years • Balance is fine • No orthostatic hypotension, constipation, nausea • Strength is normal • Blurry vision, otherwise no oculobulbar complaints or trouble controlling her bowel or bladder

  29. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #3 • Physical examination • Cranial nerves – normal • Motor exam – normal • Sensory exam • Decreased pinprick sensation in the distal foot, otherwise normal • Normal vibration, light touch, temperature sensation • Reflexes - normal • Coordination - normal

  30. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #3 • Electrodiagnostics • CMAP – normal median, ulnar, fibular • SNAP – normal sural, medial dorsal cutaneous, median, ulnar, radial • NEE – normal UE/LE

  31. Generalized peripheral neuropathies Pictures of EDX

  32. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #3 • “Electrodiagnostic impression: Normal study. No generalized peripheral neuropathy or lumbosacral radiculopathy.”

  33. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Subtle neuropathies • EDX techniques to increase sensitivity • Medial plantar • Mild diabetics – 50% with prolonged sural latency, 70% prolonged/absent medial plantar (Reeves 1984)

  34. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Small fiber neuropathy • Sensory fibers for pain, temperature, autonomic fibers • Clinical presentation with pain, burning • Usually no numbness, tingling, weakness • Physical examination • Loss of pinprick and temperature sensation with normal light touch, proprioception and vibration • Normal strength • Normal MSR

  35. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Small fiber neuropathy • Studies • Electrodiagnostics – normal!!! • Skin biopsy • Measurement of intraepidermal nerve fiber density • Decreased in 77% of patients at the distal calf with clinical suspicion of small fiber neuropathy (Holland 1998) • Autonomic testing • Different tests, yields

  36. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • EMG BLIND SPOTS!! • Subtle neuropathies • Consider tests with increased sensitivity (medial plantar) • Small fiber neuropathy • Remember standard EDX only tests large fibers

  37. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • Patient #3 – revised impression • “Electrodiagnostic Impression: Normal study. No generalized peripheral neuropathy affecting large fibers. • Clinical Impression: A neuropathy primarily affecting small fibers cannot be excluded with standard electrodiagnostic studies. Specialized testing (skin biopsy, autonomic testing) could be considered to further assess this possibility.”

  38. Generalized peripheral neuropathies • EMG BLIND SPOTS!! – summary • GBS • Be aware of low yield in early testing – use H-reflex • Be aware of non length-dependent findings (sural sparing) • CIDP • Be aware of low sensitivity of research criteria • Be aware of relatively high frequency of atypical presentations • Possible subtle neuropathies • Consider testing with increased sensitivity (i.e. medial plantar) • Remember small fiber neuropathies have negative EDX!

  39. Conclusions

  40. Generalized peripheral neuropathies Thank you!!

  41. References Asbury AK, Cornblath DR. Assessment of current diagnostic criteria for Guillain-Barre syndrome. Ann Neurol 1990;27(suppl):S21-S24. Albers JW, Donofrio PD, McGonagle TK. Sequential electrodiagnostic abnormalities in acute inflammatory demyelinatingpolyradiculoneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1985;8:528-539. Gordon PH, Wilbourne AJ. Early electrodiagnostic findings in Guillain-Barre syndrome. Arch Neurol 2001;58:913-917. Amato AA, Russell JA. Neuromuscular disorders. New York: McGraw Hill Medical; 2008. Dyck PJ, Oviatt KF, Lambert EH. Intensive evaluation of referred unclassified neuropathies yields improved diagnosis. Ann Neurol 1981; 10: 222-226. AAN – change to EFNS Breiner A, Brannigan TH. Comparison of sensitivity and specificity among 15 criteria for chronic inflammatory demyelinatingpolyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 2014;50:40-46. Bromberg M. Comparison of electrodiagnostic criteria for primary demyelination in chronic polyneuropathy. Muscle Nerve 1991;14:968-976. Reeves ML, Seigler DE, Ayyar DR, et al. Medial plantar sensory response. Sensitive indicator of peripheral nerve dysfunction in patients with diabetes mellitus. Am J Med 1984;76(5):842-846. Holland NR, Crawford TO, Hauer P, Cornblath DR, Griffin JW, McArthur JC. Small-fiber sensory neuropathies: clinical course and neuropathyology of idiopathic causes. Ann Neurol 1988;55(1):47-59.

More Related