1 / 17

Thomas H. Stock, Maria T. Morandi, Masoud Afshar, Valerie Murray, Silvia Maberti

Investigation of Spatial Variation of Air Toxics in Three Houston-Area Neighborhoods Using Passive Sampling. Thomas H. Stock, Maria T. Morandi, Masoud Afshar, Valerie Murray, Silvia Maberti University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX Kuenja C. Chung U.S. EPA, Region 6, Dallas, TX.

davis-wiggins
Download Presentation

Thomas H. Stock, Maria T. Morandi, Masoud Afshar, Valerie Murray, Silvia Maberti

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Investigation of Spatial Variation of Air Toxics in Three Houston-Area Neighborhoods Using Passive Sampling Thomas H. Stock, Maria T. Morandi, Masoud Afshar, Valerie Murray, Silvia Maberti University of Texas School of Public Health, Houston, TX Kuenja C. Chung U.S. EPA, Region 6, Dallas, TX

  2. Advantages of Passive Samplersfor Ambient Air Monitoring • Small, light weight and requires no power • Easy to handle in the field • Relatively unobtrusive • Multiple simultaneous samples • Locations not accessible with conventional methods • Fewer security concerns

  3. Field Evaluation Studies of 3M OVMfor Ambient Air Monitoring • Phase 1. Feasibility and determination of operational parameters, including limited method comparison • Phase 2. Year-long comparison of central monitoring site vs. nearby centroid • Phase 3. Intensive spatial variation study

  4. Phase 3 Study Design • Simultaneous monitoring in three areas, defined as a 2-mile radius around each TCEQ monitoring site: Aldine, Clinton Dr. and Deer Park. • In each area, simultaneous monitoring at TCEQ monitoring site, census tract centroid, and 10 homes of volunteers. • 72-hour sampling, performed 6 times during May-September.

  5. Houston Area Monitoring Sites

  6. Study Areas

  7. Aldine Monitoring Station

  8. Clinton Drive Monitoring Station

  9. Deer Park Monitoring Station

  10. OVM Sample Shelter

  11. OVM Samples and Field Blank

  12. Target Compounds and 72-hr MDLs

  13. Target Compounds and 72-hr MDLs

  14. Results of Phase 3 Sampling • In both the Aldine and Clinton study areas, concentrations of many VOCs outside some homes frequently exceeded measurements at the central site. • In the Deer Park area, house measurements were in closer agreement with the central site measurements. • Concentrations measured at Aldine House 7 (A7) had the highest median values for 20 compounds in the Aldine area. • Concentrations measured at Clinton House 10 (C10) had the highest median values for 11 compounds in the Clinton area.

  15. Supplementary Sampling • In order to differentiate between very localized sources of VOCs outside homes and more area-wide sources, 5 OVMs were placed in different positions around each of two homes with elevated concentrations (House A7 and C10). • 72-hour sampling performed twice during February-April.

  16. Results of Supplementary Sampling • Samples from House A7 showed elevated levels of many compounds at only one position, that employed previously for the 6 warm weather samplings. • Interviews indicated that this position (above the garage door) was influenced by nearby resident activities (servicing/refueling of tree-cutting equipment, frequent idling and washing/waxing of vehicles in driveway). • Samples from House C10 were uniformly elevated, indicating the influence of more remote source(s) affecting a wider area, but not characterized by the central site measurements.

  17. Conclusions • Passive sampling is a useful technique for evaluating spatial heterogeneity of ambient air concentrations of VOCs. • Concentrations of many VOCs in two Houston areas are frequently underestimated by measurements at central monitoring sites. • Elevated levels of compounds appear to be persistent, i.e., similar results were observed during warm and cooler weather sampling. • Spatial mapping of concentrations around homes can be used successfully to differentiate between observed elevated concentrations caused by specific localized resident activities (House A7) and those due to more remote sources affecting a larger area (House C10).

More Related