1 / 18

Performing Development

Performing Development. Community-driven Development Discourse and Interventions. Emmanuelle Poncin London School of Economics and Political Science Government Department. Presentation Overview. CDD discourse and interventions Analytical model of development discourse performativity

diep
Download Presentation

Performing Development

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Performing Development Community-driven Development Discourse and Interventions Emmanuelle Poncin London School of Economics and Political Science Government Department

  2. Presentation Overview • CDD discourse and interventions • Analytical model of development discourse performativity • Case study: The Philippines’ Kalahi-CIDSS programme

  3. CDD Programmes • Aims: Empowerment and good governance • Means: Give communities control over resources and decision-making to design, implement and manage their development project • World Bank: $16 billion towards 637 CDD programmes in the 2000s • New paradigm in international development?

  4. The Gap between Discourse and Interventions CDD as discourse: • The alternative to top-down development • Effective instrument of good governance and empowerment CDD as interventions: • Scarce, inconclusive empirical evidence • May exacerbate socio-political inequalities

  5. Three Approaches in Development Discourse Analyses • Rhetorical device to mask the realities of the ground (e.g. Bauer) • “Dominant” representations parasitical upon the social world (e.g. Escobar) • Practice deployed to order arenas for intervention, to enable interventions (e.g. Ferguson, Li)

  6. The Performative Operations of CDD Discourse

  7. 1. Producing Interventions by forming intelligible arenas for intervention • Represent domain to be developed in terms of a set of deficits and deficiencies that interventions propose to address • Exclude what lies beyond the scope of intervention • Form arenas where interventions become intelligible and thus possible

  8. 2.Legitimising & Reproducing Interventionsby forming enabled/constrained arenas of intervention • “Constrained” environments: deficit of agency, poor governance • “Enabled” environments: high stocks of social capital, empowerment, “progressive” leaders • Shift the responsibility for failure from interventions onto their recipients • Validate the legitimacy of interventions, enable their reproduction

  9. 3. The formation of enabled/constrained environments depends on performances triggered by CDD discourse, regardless of the operations & effects of interventions • Discourse “hails” individuals as specific subjects / CDD discourse “hails” local officials as “progressive” • It succeeds or not in triggering recognition by those hailed, expressed in their performances • Discourse’s performative strength resides in the institutional conditions of its production and enactment • In the context of poor understanding of CDD & World Bank’s priorities of producing and reproducing interventions, performances are substituted for interventions’ operations and effects to form enabled/constrained environments

  10. 4- Discursive representations affect the power dynamics of arenas of intervention Impact on: • Local officials’ power • Institutions’ legitimacy • By misrepresenting arenas and interventions, risk of participating in reproducing social inequalities and legitimising capture-prone institutions

  11. Case Study: Kalahi-CIDSS in the Province of Bohol

  12. Bohol: Discursive Representations Before Kalahi: • Poor, unproductive, agricultural economy • Lacking public goods & services, human & social capital • Ideal arena for Kalahi intervention During Kalahi: • “Enabled” province – less poverty, greater political stability, governance innovations • Thanks to Kalahi, development projects, “progressive” leadership • Evidence of rising poverty and inequalities challenging Bohol development/CDD “success story”

  13. Kalahi Operations Local officials’ capture: • Funding for local government’s priorities • Manipulated processes • Irregularities • Clientelism Yet, Bohol’s representation as “enabled” legitimised Kalahi operations and enabled its reproduction • Why was Bohol formed as an “enabled” environment

  14. 1- Institutional Conditions of Reception • Lacking local basis for capital accumulation • Dependency on external resources • Local officials’ recognition as “progressive” leaders hailed by development discourse • Offer adequate performances

  15. 2- Institutional Conditions of Production • World Bank’s staff awareness of capture versus • Normative appeal of empowerment/good governance • Disbursing funds quickly & replicating programmes • Lack of viable alternative to CDD • Discursive formations of local arenas based on local officials’ performances rather than CDD’s operations and effects

  16. The Effects of Performance-Based CDD Discourse • Increase local politicians’ power, reproduce power structures • Legitimise capture-prone institutions • Legitimise and reproduce institutional set-up of counterinsurgency-led development that engendered harassment and killings of political activists

  17. Some Conclusions Flawed theoretical premises of CDD: • Disempowerment is not based on deficits of agency, but on deeply entrenched inequalities • Local officials’ pursuit of particularistic interests is not caused by insufficient social capital, but by their comparatively huge power • Poor governance is not an issue of insufficient popular demand, but is rooted in social inequalities and capture-prone institutions • Overlook issues of power, inequality, contention and meanings • Systematic misrepresentation of local “arenas” and interventions, to enable interventions’ production and reproduction, participates in legitimising capture-prone institutions and reproducing social inequalities

  18. Thank you! Emmanuelle Poncin e.poncin@lse.ac.uk

More Related