150 likes | 300 Views
THIRD EAC STEERING COMMITTEE MEETING IMS TWG PROGRESS REPORT. BUJUMBURA, BURUNDI 02/09/2013 TO 03/09/2013. OBJECTIVES OF THE IMS.
E N D
THIRD EAC STEERING COMMITTEE MEETINGIMSTWG PROGRESS REPORT BUJUMBURA, BURUNDI 02/09/2013 TO 03/09/2013
OBJECTIVES OF THE IMS • To implement a common information management system for medicines registration/regulation in each of the EAC Partner States’ NMRAs which are linked in all partner states and EAC Secretariat. • Common information management system for drug registration/regulation operational in all EAC Partner States’ NMRAs and linked regionally by end of year 4
ASSESSMENT • Assessment of EAC NMRAs done by WHO in February 2013. • Report was prepared and presented. • Report proposed • Architecture and infrastructure models for EAC NMRAs information systems
FACE TO FACE MEETING - KIGALI • IMSTWG – met in Kigali in May and discussed the Assessment Report • The report was modified and a number of proposals adopted. These were: • IMS implementation architecture model was adopted. • Number of modules to be automated was agreed upon • A number of emerging issues were also noted. Some are: • System sustainability • Lack of a data sharing policy frame work • E-Readiness of countries and the EAC for automation • Availability of harmonised processes for automation
VIDEO CONFERENCES • VCs were held and the IMSTWG developed documents addressing various issues. Documents primarily focused on: • System development process • IMS Architecture model • Specifications (VC equipment and IMS system) • Module to be automated • Business Processes Analysis (Medicines, Food, Cosmetics, Medical Devices, GMP, Import/Export)
MILESTONES ACHIEVED • Documents developed by the IMSTWG are: • Assessment Report – • System Implementation Architecture • Modules for automation • Implementation Work plan • VC specifications • Request for Proposals • Software Specifications • Business Processes Analysis in: • Medicines • Food • Medical Devices • Cosmetics • GMP • Import/Export • Clinical Trials • Waste Management/Disposal
SUMMARY ON SYSTEM IMPLEMENTATION ARCHITECTURE • Currently we are in Circle B – Business Architecture • BPA has been done for various processes.
RECOMMENDATIONS … 1 • The proposed developed system should be aligned to fit NMRA and EAC requirements (interoperability with other systems). • Information from TWGs in QMS, MER and GMP will be critical to the success of the IMS process and therefore current information dissemination process need review to factor in more: • Joint Face to Face meetings • Joint VCs
RECOMMENDATIONS … 2 • Procurement of software development consultant to participate in the design, development, implementation and support of IMS system for each NMRA and the EAC through a process that will allow users participation, understanding and appreciation of the nature and impact of automation.
RECOMMENDATIONS … 3 • Financial model for the development and implementation of the project needs to factor in: • Cyber Security • Hosting Services • User support and capacity building • Interoperability with other systems • None-infrastructure costs like e-readiness study • Change management issues.
RECOMMENDATIONS … 4 • Bench marking of the IMS system with other international information systems used in Medicines regulation. • Need for legal guidance on issues regarding information sharing in the EAC partner states.
RECOMMENDATION … 5 • Sustainability of the IMS project post implementation should focus on the areas of: • Human Resource (users) • Technology support (programmers and system administrators) • Finance (Licensing costs) • Training.
FUTURE PROJECTIONS • The IMSTWG has only one projection. SUCCESS