1 / 33

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR WATER SERVICES

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR WATER SERVICES. Presentation to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Water Affairs & Forestry. 18 February 2004. Outline of presentation. Background Process to get to the Strategic Framework Document Structure Policy highlights and issues

Download Presentation

STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR WATER SERVICES

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR WATER SERVICES Presentation to Parliamentary Portfolio Committee on Water Affairs & Forestry 18 February 2004

  2. Outline of presentation • Background • Process to get to the Strategic Framework • Document Structure • Policy highlights and issues • Challenges identified by SALGA • Way Forward

  3. Background • More than 11 million, including 9 million rural people served by all spheres of government since 1994 with access to a safe water supply : substantial achievement. • Sanitation high priority and increasing speed of delivery. • Efficient services essential for economic growth and poverty eradication.

  4. Water Supply Perspective (Figures based on Census 2001 updated to March 2003) Standpipes further than 200m + boreholes Unacceptable River, pool, dam, stream Standpipes less than 200m Water in house or in yard 28.3 m (61.3%) 6.7 m (14.5%) 6.2 m (13.4%) 5 m (10,8%) Total population : 46.2million 5 m (10,8%) Note : These figures reflect access to infrastructure, not necessarily effective services e.g water quality, flow & sustainability 11.2 m (24,2%) . 17.9 m (38,7%)

  5. Sanitation Perspective(Figures based on Census 2001 updated to March 2003) Unacceptable None, pit latrine, buckets, chemical (1.8 m buckets) Flush toilet (connected to sewer systems or septic tank) VIP 24 m 51.9% 4.1m 8.9% 18.1m 39.2% Total population : 46.2million 18.1 m (39.2%) Note : These figures reflect access to infrastructure, not necessarily effective services. 22.2 m (48%)

  6. Process to develop the Strategic Framework • “Issues and options” document and consultation thereon: April 02-June 02 • Draft ‘White Paper”: Sept 02 • Second round of consultation • Review with Core Group (DWAF, SALGA, SAAWU, DPLG, NT): Jan - May 2003 • Inputs Minister and final edits: Jul - Aug 03 • Approved by Cabinet as Strategic Framework: 17 Sept 03 • Now official national water services policy

  7. Style of document • 10 year vision for sector (not only DWAF) • Comprehensive framework (replaces 1994 White Paper) • Summary of key policies whilst leaving out “guidelines" & detail

  8. Document structure • Preface by minister & sector overview • Introduction • Sector vision, goals and targets • Institutional framework • Financial framework • Planning framework • National norms and standards • Regulatory framework • Support & monitoring framework • Conclusion

  9. Policy Highlights 1: Targets • Bold step: targets for sector with dates and responsibilities • Developmental targets - Examples: • Access to basic services - 2008 / 2010 • Free basic services - 2005 / 2010 • Transfers - 2005 • Sector Invest 0.75% of GDP annually • Institutional reform – 2013 (strategy 2004) • DWAF reports annually

  10. Policy Highlights 2: Mandates • Municipalities: • DWAF: • Water Boards: Ensuring access, planning, regulation and provision. Policy,regulation,support and information management. Regional WSP’s for bulk regulated by DWAF and retail WSP’s (regulated by contract with WSA)

  11. Policy Highlights 3: Institutional Reform • Agreement that reform is required • Objectives, principles and approach defined • Reform process set out • national leadership • bottom-up approach • case by case • national institutional reform strategy + finance for implementation • Diverse outcomes likely

  12. Policy Highlights 4: Finances • Decentralised fiscal framework • MIG (sector specific conditions) • Tariff policy & setting (use of ES) • Credit control • Financial sustainability

  13. Policy Highlights 5:Principles in credit control • Compassion • Communication • Fair and transparent process • Warning • Restricting and not disconnecting, except if tampering or system failure

  14. Policy Highlights 6: Planning • Importance of planning (IDP and WSDP) • Integrate water services with water resource planning • Water conservation and water demand management strategy as part of WSDP • Plan for ongoing operations and maintenance

  15. Policy Highlights 7:Stepping up the ladder • Provision of basic services most important priority but is only the first step up the ladder (RDP) • Over time water services authorities are expected to provide intermediate and higher levels of service: • wherever practical and • provided it is financially viable and sustainable to do so • Sector to develop financial instruments with funding agencies and National Treasury • Review definition of basic services

  16. Policy Highlights 9: Regulation • Importance of planning (IDP and WSDP) • Local regulation by WSA • National regulatory oversight • Format of national regulator to be investigated • Regulation of regional WSPs • Regulatory strategy being developed

  17. Policy Highlights 10Mechanisms of Support • Capacity building grant • Knowledge networks (peer to peer) • Advisory service (expertise on demand) • Guidelines and tools (practical) • Strategic support initiatives • Skills development (education, training and capacity building)

  18. STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR WATER SERVICES Challenges identified by SALGA

  19. Institutional Reform and Section 78 • Need to proceed with institutional reform to reduce costs and increase accountability • Section 78 assessments are ahead of the institutional reform process due to legal requirements • Defining the scopeof the section 78 assessments are a challenge when regional options could be considered, therefore such areas require specific focus. • Ensuring sufficient capacity to undertake & support these activities remain a challenge

  20. Transfer Challenges • Joint implementation of the transfer policy remains a challenge, particularly with regard to: • agreement on the condition of assets to be transferred • the number of staff to be transferred • the financial impact on the recipient municipality • “Joint Response Team” approach in dealing with the implementation challenges is welcomed

  21. Sanitation • Meeting sanitation targets are a major challenge in the current policy environment • Increased capital and operating funds required to meet the sanitation challenge, including free basic sanitation • DWAF needs to clearly define basic sanitation for dense (often urban) areas. Current policy only caters for less dense (rural) areas, in the form of a VIP per household. This option is not viable in most dense settlements

  22. Free basic services policy • The message reaching communities is 'free services' and not 'free basic services' • Communication needs to be improved to prevent negative (financial) impacts on municipalities

  23. Planning • Planning initiatives of municipalities, national and provincial government need to be properly aligned. • Also relevant to water services & resource planning. • Linking planning activities of the departments of housing, education and health to municipal planning requires more effort.

  24. Support • DWAF support needs to be closely integrated with the work being done by SALGA and must be targeted to those municipalities most in need of assistance. • Continued cooperation between SALGA & DWAF through the Masibambane (sector) approach should ensure optimal use of resources

  25. STRATEGIC FRAMEWORK FOR WATER SERVICES WAY FORWARD DWAF SALGA Collaboration

  26. Way Forward: Implementation • DWAF and SALGA ‘Communication Roll Out’ to ensure municipalities and sector understand implications of the SFWS • SFWS is a framework – much of the detail is still to be clarified • SALGA / DWAF Summit of October 2003 resulted in Declaration to cooperate and jointly implement the SFWS • All further work to be done through sector task teams

  27. Implementation (2) • Institutional Reform • Sector task team established (SALGA, DWAF, NT, DPLG, SAAWU) • Consultant support in place • Strategy development to be completed by June 2004 • Principles of Reform • WSA’s are responsible • WSP’s accountable to WSA • Bottom-up process • National government will lead process • Incremental and case-by-case • Existing and sound business case • Accountability of regional WSPs to WSA • Transform, rather than establish new institutions

  28. Implementation (3) • Regulatory Strategy development initiated • Review of sector legislation scoping initiated (amendments to WS Act) • Strategic Assessment of “State of Sector” reporting initiated • Developing a format and scoping of report

  29. Implementation (4) • Institutional Support Strategy being initiated • Funding • MIG: sector conditions set (next slide) • Investment modeling to be done at provincial & municipal level • Measuring target achievement complex • Sector collaboration • Great achievements, but much still to be done, particularly in some provinces • Capacity in sector still a challenge

  30. MIG • Conditional Grant – cross cutting and sector specific conditions • For basic services only (backlog & the poor) • DWAF and SALGA engaged with other sector stakeholders to set policy and procedures • DWAF concerned about capacity of some municipalities to implement MIG • DWAF must support LG on implementation of projects through MIG

  31. Transfer Challenges • The target for transfer of all DWAF owned schemes is June 2005 • Currently slightly behind schedule • Possible special arrangements where municipalities are weak in terms of administrative and / or technical capacity • Limpopo a particular challenge

  32. Transfer Progress • 11 Transfer Agreements signed (8 municipalities and 3 water boards) • Negotiations at advanced stage with 21 municipalities (likely to be concluded before 2003/4 financial year end). This represents 34% of agreements. • 48 schemes have been transferred • Total asset value transferred is R648.5m • 316 staff transferred • R25.9m has been transferred to municipalities and water boards for refurbishment

  33. Water is Life ! Sanitation is Dignity !

More Related