1 / 33

CLIC_DDS study

CLIC_DDS study. 30.11.2010. CLIC_DDS Study Collaboration. Vasim Khan Alessandro D’Elia Roger Jones. University of Manchester and Cockcroft institute, U.K. CERN, Switzerland. Alexej Grudiev Germana Riddone Vadim Soldatov Walter Wuensch Riccardo Zennaro. Outlook.

hidi
Download Presentation

CLIC_DDS study

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. CLIC_DDS study 30.11.2010

  2. CLIC_DDS Study Collaboration • Vasim Khan • Alessandro D’Elia • Roger Jones University of Manchester and Cockcroft institute, U.K. CERN, Switzerland • Alexej Grudiev • Germana Riddone • Vadim Soldatov • Walter Wuensch • Riccardo Zennaro

  3. Outlook • Summary of Optimisation: CLIC_DDS • Overview of test structure: CLIC_DDS_A • High Phase Advance (HPA) Structures: Merits and Demerits • CLIC_DDS_HPA • Future of CLIC_DDS_HPA

  4. DDS_C DDS_E Circular CLIC_DDS optimisation summary ε=1.38 Circular cell ε=1.38 ε=0.82 Manifold-damped single cell DDS_C DDS_E

  5. CLIC_DDS_A: Monopole properties Esur Max. Values Esur=220 MV/m ∆T = 51 K Pin= 70.8 Eacc_UL=131 MV/m Sc=6.75 W/μm2 RF-beam-eff=23.5% 35*Sc Eacc Pin ∆T CLIC_G Values Esur=240 MV/m ∆T = 51 deg. Pin= 63.8 Eacc_UL=128 MV/m Sc=5.4 W/μm2 RF-beam-eff=27.7% Dashed curves : Unloaded condition Solid curves: Beam loaded condition

  6. CLIC_DDS_A: Dipole properties 24 cells No interleaving Qavg ~1700

  7. High Phase Advance Structures 1) Low group velocity → Less power absorbed during breakdown Ref: R.M. Jones, et. al., SLAC-PUB 8887 CLIC

  8. NLC: Band partitioning NLC: DS1 a = 4.23 mm ψacc : 120°→ 150°:Lowest dipole kick factor reduces by ~ 20% Ref: R.M. Jones, et. al., SLAC-PUB 9467

  9. Fundamental mode Optimisation CLIC_DDS_HPA

  10. Band partitioning: CLICDDS_A and DDS_HPA

  11. Dipole mode properties 120deg. Γx = 0.0126 150deg. Γx = 0.021 Cell # 1 a=4.0 mm, t=3.2 mm Cell # 1 a=4.0 mm, t=4.0 mm

  12. DDS_HPA

  13. Comparison: 120 vs 150

  14. DDS_HPA: Merits and Demerits • Reduction in dipole bandwidth from 2.1 GHz to 1.8 GHz • Necessary to reduce bunch population to satisfy wakefield constrains • Luminosity reduction Merits Demerits • Reduced input power • Less power absorbed during breakdown • Kick factors reduced • Better dipole coupling • Cost efficient ?

  15. Enhanced damping: Eight manifolds Four regular and four additional manifolds Significant coupling

  16. Cell # 1 Cell parameters a = 4.3 mm t = 2.6 mm Rc = 9.0 mm Mr = 2.0 mm Mc = 15.1 mm Fundamental mode properties Q=7080 R’/Q=10.356 (kΩ/m) vg=2.44 (%c) Es/Eacc=2.22 Hs/Eacc=4.3 (mA/m) Sc/Eacc=5.45 x 10-4 (W/μm2/Eacc2) fsyn=16.1 GHz Dipole mode properties

  17. Cell # 24 Cell parameters a = 2.5 mm t = 2.8 mm Rc = 8.8 mm Mr = 2.0 mm Mc = 15.1 mm vg=0.32 (%c) fsyn=17.89 GHz

  18. Two Cell result Need improvement Lowest dipole mode properties Δf=2.25 σ=1.78 GHz Δf/fc= 10.5 (%c)

  19. Eight manifolds and Sic As the coupling in the last cell is poor it is important to enhance coupling by optimising the last cell Additional manifold εr=13 tanδ=0.02 NMr=2.8 Damp_r=1 Damping material Regular manifold

  20. Cell # 24 :NMr=2 .8 Damp_r=1.0

  21. Accelerating mode NMr=2 .8 Damp_r=1 εr=14 tanδ=0.04

  22. DDS_HPA_SiC • SiC insertion in an 8-manifold cell improves damping • The SiC properites and dimensions are optimised for Cell # 24 • This optimisation does not improve damping of Cell # 1 • Due to SiC losses, multiple avoided crossings are observed • Need some modification in circuit model to incorporate additional losses (SiC) (future work ?)

  23. Closing remarks • CLIC_DDS_A is being fabricated • CLIC_DDS_A: High power test by 2011 end • CLIC_DDS_HPA: 1) Coupling looks promising 2) Need to improve bandwidth • To be investigated in detail: 1) Eight manifolds 2) DDS_SiC damping 3) Circuit model modification to incorporate SiC losses

  24. Acknowledgments • We have benefited from discussions with Juwen Wang, Zhengai Li and Toshiyasu Higo on X-band structures • Thanks to Igor Syratchev for suggesting to investigate CLIC_DDS_SiC. Thank you

  25. Additional slides

  26. Four manifolds Cell # 1 Cell # 24 Fsyn~15.76 GHz Fsyn~17 GHz Cell parameters a = 3.3 mm t = 3 mm Rc = 9.0 mm Mr = 2.0 mm Mc = 15.1 mm vg = 0.95 (%c) Cell parameters a = 4.6 mm t = 2 mm Rc = 9.0 mm Mr = 2.0 mm Mc = 15.1 mm vg = 3.6 (%c) Cell # 1 Cell # 24

  27. Cell # 1 Cell parameters a = 4.6 mm t = 2 mm Rc = 9.0 mm Mr = 2.0 mm Mc = 15.1 mm vg = 3.6 (%c) Fsyn~15.77 GHz

  28. Cell # 24 Cell parameters a = 3.3 mm t = 3 mm Rc = 9.0 mm Mr = 2.0 mm Mc = 15.1 mm vg = 0.95 (%c) Fsyn~17 GHz

  29. Cell # 1 Cell parameters a = 4.6 mm t = 2 mm Rc = 9.0 mm Mr = 2.0 mm Mc = 15.1 mm vg = 3.6 (%c) Fsyn~15.77 GHz

  30. Cell # 24 Cell parameters a = 3.3 mm t = 3 mm Rc = 9.0 mm Mr = 2.0 mm Mc = 15.1 mm vg = 0.95 (%c) Fsyn~17 GHz

  31. Cell # 1 :NMr=2 .8 Damp_r=1.0

  32. Cell # 1 Cell parameters a = 4.6 mm t = 1 mm Rc = 9.0 mm Mr = 2.0 mm Mc = 15.1 mm vg = 4.84 (%c) Fsyn~15.65 GHz

More Related