190 likes | 279 Views
Monitoring Agriculture – Strategy and Results. Margie Read, REAII Senior Environmental Scientist Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program California Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board. Presentation Outline. Where we were – Day 1 Addressing the challenges Using the 4 ‘C’s
E N D
Monitoring Agriculture – Strategy and Results Margie Read, REAII Senior Environmental Scientist Irrigated Lands Regulatory Program California Central Valley Regional Water Quality Control Board
Presentation Outline • Where we were – Day 1 • Addressing the challenges • Using the 4 ‘C’s • What we have achieved • Where we go from here
Opportunities for Compromise • Formation of Coalition Groups • Coalition Monitoring (phased) • -- Phase I: Toxicity, Field Parameters, Flow • -- Phase II: Pesticides, Metals, Nutrients • Water Board Monitoring through UC • No phasing – comprehensive approach
Approach for Communications • Staff Leads for Coalition Management • Outreach Meetings • Website and E-mail notices • Stakeholder Groups • SWAMP Comparability
Other Active Stakeholders Environmental Interests Consulting Firms Ag Commissioners Academia USEPA State Pesticide Regulators Food and Agriculture Analytical Laboratories
Approach for Coordination • Identify all monitoring activities • Synchronize sampling schedules • Strategize on monitoring sites • Encourage SWAMP Comparability
Monitoring Data Value • Provides common ground • Baseline information (status) • Identifies data gaps • Identifies water quality problems • Guides Program revisions
Approach for Collaboration • Start with common ground • Identify issues • Developed strategy • Utilize impartial review
What is the same… • Coalitions still need to comply • Program objectives • Categories for Monitoring: field measures, chemistry, flow, toxicity • Exceedance response • SWAMP QAPP
What is different…. • Objectives as 5 Program Questions • Monitoring framework • Requires electronic data submittal • Clarified actions for exceedances • Reduction of reporting & paperwork • Monitoring Design Guidance
Five Program Questions • Is the water quality protective of beneficial uses? • 2. If not, how bad is the problem? • 3. What is causing the problem? • What are the management practices used to fix the problem? • 5. Is the problem getting better as a result?
What is Different ….. Monitoring Framework • Assessment Monitoring (status) • Core Monitoring (trends) • Special Project (resolve problems)
Upcoming Challenges... • Build efficiency in Coalition work • Maximize MP implementation • Develop links with new partners • Expand SWAMP electronic submittals • Coordinate monitoring • Track Program effectiveness
For further information…. Program website: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/ programs/irrigated_lands/index.html Monitoring data reports: http:/waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/ irrigated_lands/monitoring/index.shtml Monitoring Program documents: http://www.waterboards.ca.gov/centralvalley/water_issues/irrigated_lands/coalition_group_waiver/index.shtml
Questions? Margie Lopez Read mread@waterboards.ca.gov Thank you for listening….