1 / 20

Adversarial Information Retrieval Aspects of Sponsored Search

Adversarial Information Retrieval Aspects of Sponsored Search . Jim Jansen College of Information Sciences and Technology The Pennsylvania State University jjansen@ist.psu.edu. Agenda. What is sponsored search? How does sponsored search work? Adversarial IR aspects – click fraud

lindley
Download Presentation

Adversarial Information Retrieval Aspects of Sponsored Search

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. Adversarial Information Retrieval Aspects of Sponsored Search Jim Jansen College of Information Sciences and Technology The Pennsylvania State University jjansen@ist.psu.edu

  2. Agenda • What is sponsored search? • How does sponsored search work? • Adversarial IR aspects – click fraud • How does click fraud work? • Click fraud prevention (or at least mitigation) • Conclusion

  3. Sponsored Search • is an increasingly important, popular, and uniquely contextual form of information interaction on the Web. • adversarial techniques to subvert sponsored search have received little attention in the research community. • the negative effect of spam on the sponsored search process may have greater implications than on the algorithmic process.

  4. Sponsored Search • content providers pay Web search engines to display specific links in response to user queries alongside the algorithmic. • is increasingly important in locating information on the Web. • a distinctive form of IR - uniquely dynamic contextual relationship. • significant social and political repercussions if the process is significantly compromised. Fain, D. C. and Pedersen, J. O., Sponsored Search: A Brief History, Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, vol. 32, pp. 12-13, 2006

  5. Sponsored Search – Goals and Processes Process • Provider Content • Provider Bid • Search Engine Review Process • Search Engine Keyword and Content Index • Search Engine User Interface • Search Engine Tracking • Searcher 5 1 4 7 3 2 6

  6. Sponsored Search – Goals and Processes Goals • Searcher – find right information, site, or service with the right characteristics at the right time • Search Engine – service relevant content • Provider – infer searcher intent or affect searcher attitude 3 2 1

  7. Adversarial Aspects • Sponsored search significantly reduces spam. • Why? The cost motive for the provider and search engine to present relevant content. • Search engines have review processes consisting of both automated and manual aspects to help ensure this. • Monetary factors significantly reduce spam content.

  8. Adversarial Aspects • There is the issue of click fraud with sponsored search. • Click fraud is the intentional clicking on a sponsored link where the perpetrator does not intend to buy (or use) the products or services advertised. • Click fraud has not been widely perceived as search engine spamming, but its negative effect is severe.

  9. Click Fraud • can take various forms, but the final result is usually the same. • Content providers pay for unproductive traffic. • produces revenue for the major search engines and Web sites. • the clicks generate sales commissions based on the content provider’s bid even if the click does not result in a sale.

  10. Adversarial Aspects • content providers are contractual obligated to pay for all valid clicks. • the search engine company has discretion over what is valid. • sponsored search programs suffered a click fraud rate of 12%, translating to more than $1.5 billion of Google's ad revenue in 2005. • some content providers complain that their individual click fraud rate is as high as 35%. Liedtke, M., Click Fraud Concerns Hound Google, in ABC News Money, 2006 http://abcnews.go.com/Technology/wireStory?id=1934655&CMP=OTC-RSSFeeds0312

  11. Click Fraud Implementation An Example of Click Fraud on the Sponsored Listings of a Web Search Engine.

  12. Click Fraud Implementation An Example of Contextual Link Where Click Fraud Can Occur

  13. Click Fraud Implementation A Sponsored Link Concerning Google’s AdSense Program

  14. Click Fraud Prevention • Automated and Human Filters: employ both automated and human filters in an attempt to identify current and prevent future click fraud. • Pay-per-action Paradigm: a shift in paradigm from pay-per-click to pay-per-action (i.e., actually executes an action, such as purchasing a product). • Block Blacklisted IP addresses: IPs that are know spammer sites. Click fraud perpetrators also use these IPs.

  15. Click Fraud Prevention • Aggressive monitoring of click fraud perpetrators: Click fraud is similar to what occurred in the online music industry. • The Recording Industry Association of America’s (RIAA) campaign against illegal files sharing via peer-to-peer networks. • Search engine’s must make efforts to ensure trust: Trust is a, if not the, critical element in the sponsored search paradigm. • Whether through independent auditing or internal efforts, content providers and searchers must have trust in the process if it is to be a long term business model.

  16. Conclusion • View of sponsored search as “solely advertising” may be incorrect. • From the searcher’s point of view, sponsored links are just another type of search engine result. • Sponsored search model will have increasing impact as new players enter the field (i.e., Microsoft Research and AskJeeves) and second tier players (i.e., FindWhat, Kanoodle)

  17. Conclusion • Major search engines continue to transform the basic sponsored search model. • Cross-medium linkage can significantly increase the synchronization of information pull-and-push, perhaps providing more relevant content to the searcher. • Click fraud threatens the entire process. With rates between 12% and 16%, translates into billions of dollars per year, and it jeopardizes the entire model as it decreases trust in the system.

  18. Applicable References(Available at http://ist.psu.edu/faculty_pages/jjansen/) • Jansen, B. J. and Resnick, M. Forthcoming. An examination of searcher's perceptions of non-sponsored and sponsored links during ecommerce Web searching. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. • Jansen, B. J. 2006. Paid search. IEEE Computer. 39(7), 88-90. • Jansen, B. J. and Molina, P. 2006. The effectiveness of Web search engines for retrieving relevant ecommerce links. Information Processing & Management. 42(4), 1075-1098. • Jansen, B. J. 2006. Paid Search as an Information Seeking Paradigm. Bulletin of the American Society for Information Science and Technology. 32(2), 7-8. • Jansen, B. J. and Resnick, M. 2005. Examining Searcher Perceptions of and Interactions with Sponsored Results. Workshop on Sponsored Search Auctions, The Sixth ACM Conference on Electronic Commerce (EC'05). Vancouver, Canada. 5-8 June.

  19. CFP - International Journal of Electronic Business (IJEB) • Special issue on Sponsored Search (Due date: 15 February 2007) • Guest Editors • Jim Jansen, The Pennsylvania State University • Abdur Chowdhury, AOL and the Illinois Institute of Technology.

  20. Questions and Discussion Jim Jansen College of Information Sciences and Technology The Pennsylvania State University jjansen@ist.psu.edu

More Related