1 / 12

Yellowtail Dam Modeling Results Brian Marotz Hydropower Mitigation Coordinator

Yellowtail Dam Modeling Results Brian Marotz Hydropower Mitigation Coordinator. Assumptions for this analysis. Optimize reservoir refill during primary use period. Avoid elevations in the Flood Pool above 3640. Reduce the extent and duration of spill (>8 kcfs).

makala
Download Presentation

Yellowtail Dam Modeling Results Brian Marotz Hydropower Mitigation Coordinator

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript

  1. Yellowtail Dam Modeling Results Brian Marotz Hydropower Mitigation Coordinator

  2. Assumptions for this analysis • Optimize reservoir refill during primary use period. • Avoid elevations in the Flood Pool above 3640. • Reduce the extent and duration of spill (>8 kcfs). • Reservoir draft targets for each month, January through June, were based on water supply (April through July inflow volume). • Dam discharges during fall based on similar wateryears and shaped to provide stable fisheries flows for primary river species.

  3. Monthly Elevation Targets Based on Inflow Water Supply

  4. Example of medium-low wateryear

  5. Not Directly Comparable to GorQ

  6. Comparison of Bighorn Reservoir Elevations

  7. Comparison of Bighorn River Discharges

  8. Comparison of Rule Curves and Historic Operations • Rule curves reduced reservoir drawdown in all except the highest water years. • Minimized the use of the flood pool, extent and duration. • Spill was reduced in volume and duration. On. • Bighorn River discharges remained more stable. • Extremely low river flows (<1,500 cfs) were avoided.

  9. Next step: Compare model results and optimize benefits.

More Related