1 / 39

MINORITY DISPROPORTIONALITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION: A PROBLEM OVER 50 YEARS IN THE MAKING EXPLANATIONS AND SOLUTIONS

MINORITY DISPROPORTIONALITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION: A PROBLEM OVER 50 YEARS IN THE MAKING EXPLANATIONS AND SOLUTIONS. Clayton R. Cook, PhD University of Washington.

rangsey
Download Presentation

MINORITY DISPROPORTIONALITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION: A PROBLEM OVER 50 YEARS IN THE MAKING EXPLANATIONS AND SOLUTIONS

An Image/Link below is provided (as is) to download presentation Download Policy: Content on the Website is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use and may not be sold / licensed / shared on other websites without getting consent from its author. Content is provided to you AS IS for your information and personal use only. Download presentation by click this link. While downloading, if for some reason you are not able to download a presentation, the publisher may have deleted the file from their server. During download, if you can't get a presentation, the file might be deleted by the publisher.

E N D

Presentation Transcript


  1. MINORITY DISPROPORTIONALITY IN SPECIAL EDUCATION: A PROBLEM OVER 50 YEARS IN THE MAKINGEXPLANATIONS AND SOLUTIONS Clayton R. Cook, PhD University of Washington

  2. “With personal identities, long-held beliefs, and futures at stake, it is not surprising that Americans find it difficult, and even painful, to engage in open andhonest conversation about education and race, and their role in this problem” (Ingersoll, 2003, p. 13)

  3. Agenda for Today • Background of the problem • The extent of the problem • Explanations for why the problem exists • Proposed solutions for the problem • Questions

  4. Imagine…… • Members of the cultural group to which you belong is more likely than other cultural groups to: • Get less pay for the same job • Occupy less prominent positions in government and in business despite being equally qualified • Get more severe punishment for the same offense • Get placed in programs or settings that are a known risk factor for experiencing poor outcomes later on

  5. What is disproportionality? • Disproportionality: inequality between a subgroup’s representation in a particular category and that subgroup’s representation in the general population • Misleading • Overrepresentation: group comprises a higher percentage in a category than in the population • Underrepresentation: subgroup comprises a lower percentage in a category than in the population

  6. What Disproportionality Looks Like Overrepresentation Representation of subgroup in general population Representation of subgroup in category associated with poor outcomes

  7. What Disproportionality Looks Like Underrepresentation Representation of subgroup in category associated with positive outcomes Representation of subgroup in general population

  8. Intersectionality • Examining the intersection of multiple cultural characteristics • Low SES +African American + female = MOST DISADVANTAGED • Intersectionality and disproportionality in education • African American + male + low ses = MOST AT-RISK

  9. Identifying Disproportionality • Composition Index • The percentage of students in a particular category from a specific subgroup • e.g., African Americans represent 50 out of 100 (50%) ED students • 50% of ED students compared to 15% of all students • Risk index • The percentage of a subgroup placed in a particular category • 20 out 1000 (2%) African Americans in the school district are ED

  10. Examples of Composition and Risk Indexes • Consider Women and Teaching: • Composition: 75% of all teachers are women • Risk: 2% of women are teachers • Consider Men and Senate Positions: • Composition: 91.9% of all senators are men • Risk: <0.1% of men are senators • Consider African Americans and Suspension: • Composition: 37.5% of all suspended students are AA • Risk: 15% of AA students have been suspended • Composition: 30.75% of suspended students are White • Risk: 5% of White students have been suspended

  11. Identifying Disproportionality • Odds Ratio • Comparison of the odds of placement for one group to the odds of placement for another group • African Americans: 20 out 980 ED vs. Other: 150 out 9850 ED • 0.02/0.015 = 1.33 • African Americans are 1.33 times more likely to be identified as ED than other students • Relative Risk • Same as the odds ratio but relative to a specific group (e.g., Whites)

  12. Examples of Odds Ratio • Consider Gender and Sexual Assaults • Males are 15 times more likely than females to commit a sexual assault crime • Consider Sleep and Accidents at Work • People who get less than 6 hours of sleep are 7 times more likely to have a serious accident at work than people who get more than 6 hours • Consider Ethnicity and Office Referral • African Americans are 4.5 times more likely to be referred to the office for a behavior problem than other students

  13. Historical Context • Rich history: • Brown v Board of Education (1954) • Education for All Handicapped Children Act (1975) • IDEA (1990) • IDEA (1997) • IDEiA (2004) • Three National Academy of Sciences panels have been convened (Heller, Holtzman, & Messick, 1982; Morrison, White, & Feuer, 1996; National Research Council, 2002) • 100s of published articles on the topic • Yet it still exists!

  14. Is all overrepresentation bad? • Head Start • Upward Bound • Title I • Afterschool programs

  15. Extent of the Problem • Problem that cuts across many systems • School system • Legal system • Private & Public vocational systems • Prison system

  16. Wrong Assumption • African Americans are biologically and genetically susceptible to specific learning disability, emotional disturbance, and mild mental disability • Socioeconomic status explains all there is to know about minority overrepresentation

  17. For which categories does it exist? • Exists in soft categories • Ones that require professional judgment or base decisions on subjective impressions • Emotional disturbance, specific learning disability, and mental disability-mildly impaired • Nonexistent in hard categories • Ones that have objective methods of determining presence of disability • Traumatic brain injury, visual impairment, deaf/hard of hearing, orthopedic handicap

  18. Problem Categories: Mild Mental Disability • Composition: 35% of Students in MR are African American vs. 17% of the overall student population is African-American • Risk: 2.6% of African Americans are in MR vs. 1.1% of white students; • Odds Ratio: Af-Am are 2.4 times more likely than other students • No other groups are overrepresented in MR

  19. Problem Categories: ED • Composition: 27.4% of Students with ED are African American vs. 17% Af Am in general student population • Risk: 1.6% of African-American Students are in ED vs. 1.0% of White Students • ODDS Ratio: Af-Am 1.8 times more likely than other students • No other group overrepresented in ED Adapted from Reschly (2004)

  20. Extent of the Problem • Recent data (Data Accountability Center, 2009) • African Americans: 15.07% off all students in U.S. in 2007 • 20.5% of all special education students • 28.92% of emotionally disturbed (ED) students • Disproportionately treatment • Exposed to punitive discipline (referral, suspension, and expulsion) • Placed in restrictive environments away from peers (Skiba et al., 2002) • Negative outcomes associated with ED diagnosis (Wagner et al., 2005, Wagner et al., 2006) • 1.4 GPA • Miss roughly 18 days of school per year • 50% arrested within one year of school ending • 58% dropout • 68% unable to obtain or maintain employment within five years of school ending • Cost society over 1 trillion dollars when they become adults

  21. Overrepresentation in Soft/Subjective Disabilities

  22. Debunking Myths • MYTH: All minorities are overrepresented in sp ed • FACT: Compared to white students, black and American Indian students are overrepresented, Hispanic and Asian/Pacific Islander students are underrepresented • MYTH: Hispanic students are overrepresented • FACT: Hispanic students are slightly underrepresented • MYTH: IQ tests cause overrepresentation • FACT: Good reasons exist to eliminate IQ tests, but they have little overall effect on overrepresentation

  23. Possible Explanations • Inadequate teacher training (Gardner & Miranda, 2001) • Biased assessment procedures (Gravois & Rosenfield, 2006) • Cultural mismatch (Gardner & Miranda, 2001) • Socioeconomic factors (Coutinho, Oswald & Best, 2002) • Contributes to the problem, but does not explain the entire problem • Low SES is associated with: • poor school readiness • minor behavior problems

  24. People are limited to interpreting behavior through their own cultural lens • Things that “fit” expectations are considered good • Things that “don’t fit” expectations are considered bad • Tendency to misinterpret the intent behind another’s behavior when one is ignorant about that person’s culture

  25. Recent Incident • Harvard Professor Henry Louis Gates arrested by the Cambridge, Mass., police officer • Does not fit the prism of 1960s race-relations — racist white cop intentionally targets black male • The white cop, James Crowley, lacks the traditional racist profile: • Attempted resuscitation of an African-American person • Teaches a course where cadets learn how to avoid racial profiling • President Barack Obama acknowledges that Crowley is an “outstanding police officer.”

  26. Recent Incident • All evidence indicates that Crowley is a good cop, one sensitive to racial issues • Yet he still arrested a middle-aged African-American man who uses a cane to get around at his home • How could that be? • Perhaps Crowley was not intentionally being racist but was still unconsciously discriminating • What we now know is that both conscious and unconscious processes impact an individual’s decision-making and behavior • racial bias can be automatic, unconscious and definitely unintentional.

  27. Explanations for Problems Bad, drunk driver OR cow in the road Victim OR Stupid kid

  28. Fundamental Attribution Error • The Fundamental Attribution Error: False Perception The fundamental attribution error is the tendency to overestimate the extent to which a person’s behavior is due to internal, dispositional factors and to underestimate the role of situational factors.

  29. Implicit Racial Stereotypes • African Americans as lazy, aggressive, unintelligent • Unconscious racial stereotypes are: • “unintentional because they are not planned responses; involuntary, because they occur automatically in the presence of an environmental cue; and effortless, in that they do not require a lot of effort to process information” (Graham & Lowery, 2004) • Concerns that engrained racial and cultural biases affect referral and placement of African American students into special education (Coutinho, Oswald, & Best, 2002; Artiles & Trent, 1994; Harry & Anderson, 1994)

  30. Examples of Unconscious Stereotypes • Women as nurturing and emotional • Assign women service related duties • Question their ability to be logical in times of stress • Adolescents as risky, moody, and rebellious • Withhold privilege to drive a car • Interpret behavior as just “being moody” rather a real issue • Overweight people as lazy and unmotivated

  31. Previous Research • Priming therapists and juvenile probation officers about African Americans leads to harsher punishment and recidivism ratings (Abreu, 1999; Graham & Lowery, 2004) • Elevator and alley studies • Teachers more likely to refer African American student than Caucasian student (Bahr et al., 1991) • Controlling for the nature of the problem behavior, race of the child predicts punitive discipline (Skiba et al., 1999; 2001) • Controlling for the influence of SES, race of the child predicts punitive discipline, special ed placement, and placement in restrictive setting (Skiba et al., 1999; 2001)

  32. Disproportionality Prevention • Donovan, M. S., & Cross, C. T. (2002). Minority students in special and gifted education. Washington, DC: National Academy Press. • “ There is substantial evidence with regard to both behavior and achievement that early identification and intervention is more effective than later identification and intervention.” Executive Summary, p. 5 Reschly

  33. RtI as a Solution….. • Proactive, prevention-focused service delivery model • Not wait-to-fail • Consists of exposing students to a sequence of intensifying interventions prior to special education consideration • Interventions are evidence-based • Objective, valid, and fair data are used to identify students who are at-risk for learning or behavior difficulties • Rather than a teacher’s opinion, perception, frustration, or best guess • Develop a system for monitoring disproportionality • No single snapshot—Examine trends over time • Fluctuations in representation rates and outcomes

  34. RTI Assessment Practices Progress Monitoring Progress Monitoring Progress Monitoring Special Education Universal screening Comprehensive Evaluation

  35. Solutions: Awareness Training • If people are aware of their tendency to have skewed perceptions due to unconscious stereotypes, then they can question whether they are making an accurate and fair decision • Educate school personnel about false perceptions due to unconscious stereotypes • How this can impact decision-making and behaviors • Challenge: Road rage

  36. Solutions: Multicultural Sensitivity • Awareness and acceptance of cultural differences is paramount to sensitive and accurate perceptions of student behavior • Specific trainings devoted to: • building understanding among racial and cultural groups and appreciation of different cultures • Understand behaviors that are culturally accepted • Having a swagger to one’s gait • Physical movements • defusing intergroup tensions and conflicts

  37. Take Home Message • Minority Disproportionality is vague term • It’s more specific – African American male overrep • It still exists, despite years of monitoring • Referring, suspending, identifying students as eligible for special education, and placing them in restrictive environments is a known risk factor for poor outcomes • We can engage in efforts to overcome this problem!

  38. Thank You! • Any questions?

More Related