220 likes | 330 Views
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study. Technical Workshop – December 6, 2010. Foothill Municipal Water District. Overview. History Facilities Planning Study Grant Draft Paper Review Recommendations Next Steps. History. John Morris Study Bookman-Edmonston Study RMC Study
E N D
Recycled Water Facilities Planning Study Technical Workshop – December 6, 2010 Foothill Municipal Water District
Overview • History • Facilities Planning Study Grant • Draft Paper Review • Recommendations • Next Steps
History • John Morris Study • Bookman-Edmonston Study • RMC Study • Water Resources Plan
Facilities Planning Study Grant • Up to $75,000 in matching funds • Draft due December 15. • Final due February 28, 2011. • Outline in grant forms.
Draft Paper Review • Introduction
Draft Paper Review • Study Area Characteristics • Hydrologic Features – Raymond and Verdugo Basins • Historic extractions and recharge • Water quality of groundwater and surface water • Land Use • Population Projections – Draft UWMP – Retail agencies (Please see handout) • Beneficial Uses and effluent discharges
Draft Paper Review • Water Supply Characteristics and Facilities • Description of all wholesale and retail entities • Sources of water, facilities, costs, prices • Capacities of facilities and flows • Groundwater management, recharge, overdraft • Water use trends, projections (see handout) • Quality of Supplies • Sources of additional water and plans for new facilities
Draft Paper Review • Wastewater Characteristics and Facilities • Description of wastewater entities • Description of facilities, flows, etc. • Water quality of effluent and seasonal fluctuations • Additional facilities needed • Source of industrial or other problems • Existing recycling • Existing rights to use of treated effluent • Wastewater flow variations
Draft Paper Review • Treatment requirements • Potential uses water quality • Health related water qualities (see handouts) • Discharge requirements – no discharge other than beneficial use • RWQCB requirements – General Permit
Draft Paper Review • Recycled water market • Description of assessment procedures
Draft Paper Review • Project Alternative Analysis • Planning and design assumptions • Alternatives to be evaluated – By geography: • Arroyo Seco Alternatives • Verdugo Basin Alternatives • Eaton Wash Spreading Ground Alternatives
Arroyo Seco Alternatives-.25 mgd * Plus purchase cost of Pasadena water - $1,500/AF
Verdugo Basin Alternatives - .25 - .5 mgd * Plus purchase cost of Glendale water - $530/AF
Eaton Wash Alternatives - .5 mgd * Plus purchase cost of Pasadena water - $1,500/AF ** Plus purchase cost of GRIP water - $1,000/AF
Draft Paper Review • Non-recycled water alternatives • Debris basins and infiltration galleries • Pasadena spreading ponds • Devil’s Gate Dam water transfer project • Conservation • No project alternative • Groundwater impacts – • TDS: 800 mg/l • Total nitrogen: 12 mg/l • TOC: 10 mg/l • Turbidity: 0.5 NTU
MWD Projections Source: MWD Draft 2010 UWMP, 10/4/2010
Recommended Alternatives Addition of 4rth phase based on CVWD negotiations with Glendale regarding adjudication & extension of Glendale system to Deukmejian Park
Recycled Water Costs * Based on an interest rate of 4.5%, 30 year financing
Next Steps • Submit draft to SWRCB • Revise based on comments • Decide on phasing • Submit final planning study to SWRCB • Other funding • Engineering/CEQA • Construction • Operation • Continue discussing 4rth phase with Glendale